Interhemispheric modulation induced by cortical stimulation and motor training

Physical Therapy

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 398-410

  Williams, Julie A ^a   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^a   Fregni, Felipe ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b and Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949645932     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090075     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Curtis HJ. Intercortical connections of corpus callosum as indicated by evoked potentials. J Neurophysiol. 1940;3:407-413.
2. Hilgetag CC, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced "virtual lesions" of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:953-957.
3. Chen R. Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2004;154:1-10.
4. Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Traversa R, et al. Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. Brain. 1999;122(pt 9):1731-1739.
5. Ettlinger G, Morton HB. Callosal section: its effect on performance of a bimanual skill. Science. 1963;139:485-486.
6. Lo YL, Fook-Chong S. Ipsilateral and contralateral motor inhibitory control in musical and vocalization tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2004;159:258-262.
7. Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A. Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions. Neuroimage. 2003,20:2259-2270.
8. Lee DJ, Chen Y, Schlaug G. Corpus callosum: musician and gender effects. NeuroReport. 2003;14:205-209.
9. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1970;33:193-201.
10. Christman SD, Propper RE, Dion A. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain Cogn. 2004;56:313-319.
11. Kahn I, Pascual-Leone A, Theoret H, et al. Transient disruption of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during verbal encoding affects subsequent memory performance. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:688-698.
12. Bajwa S, Bermpohl F, Rigonatti S, et al. Impaired interhemispheric interactions in patients with major depression. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196:671-677.
13. Mottaghy FM, Pascual-Leone A, Kemna LJ, et al. Modulation of a brain-behavior relationship in verbal working memory by rTMS. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 15:241-249.
14. Cincotta M, Ziemann U. Neurophysiology of unimanual motor control and mirror movements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119: 744-762.
15. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400-409.
16. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang. 2005;93:95-105.
17. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37: 2115-2122.
18. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128:490-499.
19. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. NeuroReport. 2005;16:1551-1555.
20. Wagner T, Fregni F, Eden U, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stroke: a computer-based human model study. NeuroImage. 2006;30:857-870.
21. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899-1901.
22. Floel A, Rosser N. Michka O, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20: 1415-1422.
23. Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Rigonatti SP, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2006;249:31-38.
24. Boggio PS, Castro LO, Savagim EA, et al. Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2006; 404:232-236.
25. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, et al. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:4-12.
26. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5-8.
27. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50:311-319.
28. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:845-850.
29. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application: report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:79-92.
30. Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:145-156.
31. Takano B, Drzezga A, Peller M, et al. Short-term modulation of regional excitability and blood flow in human motor cortex following rapid-rate transcranial magnetic-stimulation. NeuroImage. 2004;23:849-859.
32. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1976;4:335-374.
33. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. New York, NY: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371-401.
34. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
35. De Gennaro L, Cristiani R, Bertini M, et al. Handedness is mainly associated with an asymmetry of corticospinal excitability and not of transcallosal inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1305-1312.
36. Hakkennes S, Keating JL. Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Aust J Physiother. 2005; 51:221-231.
37. Tarkka IM, Kononen M, Pitkanen K, et al. Alterations in cortical excitability in chronic stroke after constraint-induced movement therapy. Neurol Res. 2008;30: 504-510.
38. Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:14-24.
39. Facchini S, Muellbacher W, Battaglia F, et al. Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2002;105:146-151.
40. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527(pt 3): 633-639.
41. Purpura DP, McMurtry JG. Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28:166-185.
42. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2681-2686.
43. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, et al. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:55-60.
44. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D, et al. The EXCITE trial: relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the wolf motor function test. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:549-562.
45. De Gennaro L, Bertini M, Pauri F, et al. Callosal effects of transcranial magnetic-stimulation (TMS): the influence of gender and stimulus parameters. Neurosci Res. 2004;48:129-137.