The TULSA petroleum abstracts database: A comparison of two platforms

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 29, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 92-110

  Kimball, Rusty ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparison; Database; Geoscience; Librarianship; Petroleum

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC LIBRARIES; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DISPLAY OPTIONS; GEOSCIENCES; PURCHASE DECISION; SEARCH RESULTS;

ABSTRACTING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GEOLOGY; LIBRARIES; MINING ENGINEERING; PETROLEUM ENGINEERING; PETROLEUM REFINERIES;

PETROLEUM INDUSTRY;

EID: 77949627535     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01942620903579401     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brown, Janet Dagenais. 2003. The ERIC database: A comparison of four versions. Services Review 31 (2): 154-174.
2. Buntrock, Robert E., and Mary, Ann Palma. 1990. Searching the Beilstein database online: A comparison of systems. Database 13 (6): 19-34.
3. Dialog. 2009. Dialog and the invention of online information services. http://www.dialog.com/about (accessed June 4, 2009).
4. Dialog to produce TU's petroleum abstracts. 1993. Information Today, 10 (11): 19.
5. EBSCO Information Services. 2009. About us. http://support.ebscohost.com/ contact/ about-us.php (accessed June 4, 2009).
6. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 2009. Petroleum engineering and technology schools. http://www.spe.org/spe-app/jsp/siteFunctionality/petSchools. jsp (accessed May 10, 2009).
7. University of Tulsa. 2009a. History of petroleum abstracts. http://www.pa.utulsa.edu/history.mhtml (accessed May 10, 2009).
8. University of Tulsa. 2009b. What makes PA the best choice for E&P information? http://www.pa.utulsa.edu/why-pa.mhtml (accessed June 7-8, 2009).