Retributive parsimony

Res Publica

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 377-395

  Lippke, Richard L ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Legal punishment; Parsimony; Retributivism; Sentencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949611406     PISSN: 13564765     EISSN: 15728692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11158-009-9101-7     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson, Jami L. 1999. Annulment retributivism: A Hegelian theory of punishment. Legal Theory 5: 363-388.
2. Arenella, Peter. 1992. Convicting the morally blameless: reassessing the relationship between legal and moral accountability. UCLA Law Review 39: 1511-1622.
3. Baithwaite, John. 1998. Restorative justice. In The handbook of crime and punishment, ed. Michael Tonry, 323-344. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Braithwaite, John, and Philip Pettit. 1998. Not just deserts: A republican theory of criminal justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Brook, Aaron S. 1999. An analysis of modern shame punishment as an alternative to incarceration. William and Mary Law Review 40: 653-686.
6. Cahill, Michael T. 2007. Retributive justice in the real world. Washington University Law Review 85: 815-870.
7. Cole, David. 1999. No equal justice: Race and class in the American criminal justice system. New York: New Press.
8. Currie, Elliot. 1998. Crime and punishment in America. New York: Henry Holt.
9. Dolinko, David. 1991. Some thoughts about retributivism. Ethics 101: 537-559.
10. Duff, R. A. 1977. Psychopathy and moral understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 189-200.
11. Duff, R. A. 1986. Trials and punishments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Duff, R. A. 2003. Restoration and retribution. In Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms?, eds. Andrew von Hirsch, Julian V. Roberts, and Anthony Bottoms, 43-59. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
13. Fine, Cordelia, and Jeanette Kennett. 2004. Mental impairment, moral understanding, and criminal responsibility: Psychopathy and the purposes of punishment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 27: 425-443.
14. Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its meaning, measurement, and moral importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. Hagan, John, and Ronit Dinovitzer. 1999. Collateral consequences of punishment for children, communities, and prisoners. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 26: 121-162.
16. Hampton, Jean. 1991. A new theory of retribution. In Liability and responsibility: New essays in law and morals, eds. R. G. Frey, and Christopher W. Morris, 377-414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Haney, Craig. 2003. Mental health issues in long-term solitary and 'supermax' confinement. Crime & Delinquency 49: 124-156.
18. Harris, Grant T., Tracey A. Skilling, and Marnie E. Rice. 2001. The construct of psychopathy. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 28: 197-264.
19. Hochschild, Jennifer. 1991. The politics of the estranged poor. Ethics 101: 560-578.
20. Husak, Douglas. 1992. Drugs and rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Husak, Douglas. 2008. Overcriminalization: The limits of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Husak, Douglas, and Peter de Marneffe. 2005. The legalization of drugs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. James, Doris J. and Lauren E. Glaze. 2006. Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
24. Jareborg, Nils. 1998. Why bulk discounts in multiple offense sentencing? In Fundamentals of sentencing theory, eds. Andrew Ashworth, and Martin Wasik, 129-140. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. Kahan, Dan. 1996. What do alternative sanctions mean? University of Chicago Law Review 63: 591-653.
26. Kant, Immanuel. 2002. The philosophy of law (trans: Hastie, W.). 194-205. Union, N. J.: Lawbook Exchange.
27. Kurki, Leena, and Norval Morris. 2001. The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 28: 385-424.
28. Lazarus, Liora. 2004. Contrasting prisoners' rights: A comparative examination of Germany and England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Lippke, Richard L. 1999. Making offenders pay-for the costs of their punishment. Social Theory and Practice 25: 61-77.
30. Lippke, Richard L. 2004. Against supermax. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21: 109-124.
31. Lippke, Richard L. 2007. Rethinking imprisonment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Lippke, Richard L. 2008. No easy way out: Dangerous offenders and preventive detention. Law and Philosophy 27: 383-414.
33. Markel, Dan. 2001. Are shaming punishments beautifully retributive? Retributivism and the implications for the alternative sanctions debate. Vanderbilt Law Review 54: 2157-2242.
34. Massaro, Toni M. 1991. Shame, culture and American criminal law. Michigan Law Review 89: 1880-1944.
35. Mill, J. S. 1979. Utilitarianism, ed. George Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
36. Morris, Herbert. 1968. Persons and punishment. Monist 52: 475-501.
37. Morris, Norval. 1982. Madness and the criminal law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Morris, Norval, and Michael Tonry. 1990. Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Morse, Stephen. 1998. Excusing and the new excuse conditions: A legal and conceptual review. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 23: 329-406.
40. Murphy, Jeffrey. 1972. Moral death: A Kantian essay in psychopathy. Ethics 82: 284-298.
41. Murphy, Jeffrey. 1973. Marxism and retribution. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 217-243.
42. Nagin, Daniel S. 1998. Deterrence and incapacitation. In The handbook of crime and punishment, ed. Michael Tonry, 345-368. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Nathanson, Stephen. 1985. Does it matter if the death penalty is arbitrarily administered? Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 149-164.
44. Ryberg, Jesper. 2005. Retributivism and multiple offending. Res Publica 11: 213-233.
45. Sadurski, Wojciech. 1985. Giving desert its due. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
46. Sher, George. 1987. Desert. Princeton, N. J: Princeton University Press.
47. Steiker, Carol S. 2005. The ethics and empirics of capital punishment: No, capital punishment is not morally required. Stanford Law Review 58: 751-789.
48. Stuntz, William J. 1998. Race, class, and drugs. Columbia Law Review 98: 1795-1842.
49. Tonry, Michael. 1992. Proportionality, parsimony, and interchangeability of punishments. In Penal theory and penal practice, eds. R. A. Duff, S. Marshall, R. E. Dobash, and R. P. Dobash. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
50. van den Haag, Ernest. 1978. The collapse of the case against capital punishment. National Review 31: 395-407.
51. van Zyl Smit, Dirk. 2001. Imprisonment today and tomorrow: International perspectives on prisoners' rights and prison conditions, 2nd ed. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
52. von Hirsch, Andrew. 1993. Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
53. von Hirsch, Andrew, and Andrew Ashworth. 2005. Proportionate sentencing: Exploring the principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Walker, Nigel. 1991. Why punish: Theories of punishment reassessed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Wasik, Martin, and Andrew von Hirsch. 1994. Sect. 29 revisited: Previous convictions in sentencing. Criminal Law Review 1994: 409-418.
56. Whitman, James Q. 1998. What is wrong with inflicting shame sanctions? Yale Law Journal 107: 1055-1092.
57. Whitman, James Q. 2003. Harsh justice: Criminal punishment and the widening divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Winick, Bruce J. 2003. A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of sex offender registration and community notification laws. In Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy, eds. Bruce J. Winick, and John Q. La Fond, 213-229. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
59. Zimring, Franklin E. 1998. Toward a jurisprudence of youth violence. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 24: 477-501.