An overview of driving distraction measure methods

Proceeding 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design: E-Business, Creative Design, Manufacturing - CAID and CD'2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 2391-2394

  Wu, Qun ^a,b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Driver distraction; Driving performance; Eye tracking system; Measure method

Indexed keywords

DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH; DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; DRIVING DISTRACTIONS; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; EYE TRACKING SYSTEMS; MEASUREMENT TOOLS;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; NAVIGATION; PRODUCT DESIGN;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 77949599312     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CAIDCD.2009.5374862     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Neale, V.L., Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Sudweeks, J. and Goodman, M.. An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. In Proceedings of the International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, 2005.
2. Trezise, I., Stoney, E. G., Bishop, B., Eren, et. Al.. Report of the road safety committee on the inquiry into driver distraction. Australia Road Safety Committee Rep. No. 209. 2006.
3. Pettitt, M., Burnett, G., & Stevens, A.. Defining driver distraction. World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, 2005
4. Stutts, J. C., Reinfurt, D. W., Staplin, L., et al. The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. 2001.
5. Smiley, A. What is Distraction? International Conference on Distracted Driving. 2005.
6. Hedlund, J., Simpson, H., Mayhew, D. International Conference on Distracted Driving: Summary of proceedings and recommendations. Toronto: Traffic Injury Research Foundation and Canadian Automobile Association. 2006.
7. T. A. Ranney. Driver Distraction: A Review of the Current State-of-Knowledge. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No.DOT HS 810787.2008.
8. Donmez, B., Boyle, L., Lee, J. D. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(3), 581-590. 2007.
9. Almén, L..Reducing the effects of driver distraction: A comparison of distraction alerts on driver attention. Linköpings universitet, Linköping. 2003
10. Farber, E., Foley, J., Scott, S. Visual attention design limits for ITS in-vehicle systems: The Society of Automotive Engineers standard for limiting visual distraction while driving. Transportation Research Board Annual General Meeting, 2000.
11. Haigney, D., Westerman, S. J.. Mobile phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics, 2001,44:132-143.
12. Curry, R., Greenberg, J., Blanco, M. An alternate method to measure driver distraction. Intelligent Transportation Society of America's Twelfth Annual Meeting and Exposition, 2002.
13. Horst R. Occlusion as a Measure for Visual Workload: An Overview of TNO Occlusion Research in Car Driving. Applied Ergonomics, 2004, 35 (2): 189-196.
14. Green, P., & Tsimhoni, O. (2001). Visual occlusion to assess the demands of driving tasks: the literature. Exploring the Occlusion Technique: Progress in recent research and applications, Turin, Italy.
15. Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., Albert, R. W., et al. Cell phon induced perceptual impairments during simulated driving. Proceedings of the International Driving Symposium on the Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. 2002.
16. Keinath, A., Baumann, M., Gelau, C., Bengler, K., & Krems, J. F. Evaluation of in-vehicle HMI using occlusion techniques: Experimental results and practical implications. Exploring the Occlusion Technique: Progress in recent research and applications, 2001
17. Green, P., Hoekstra, E., Williams, M. Further on-the-road tests of driver interfaces: examination of a route guidance system and car phone. Report No.UMTRI-93-35. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. 1993
18. Reed, M. P., Green, P. A. Comparison of driving performance on-road and in low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics, 1999.42,1015-1037.
19. Wikman, A-S., Nieminen, T., Summala, H.. Driving experience and time sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics, 1998,41: 358-372
20. Mattes, S. The lane change task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In H. Strasser, H. Rausch & H. Bubb (Eds.), Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future. Stuttgart: Ergonomia Verlag. 2003.
21. ISO. (2008). Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Simulated lane change test to assess driver distraction. ISO/TC 22/SC 13 N WG8 N579, DIS 26022.
22. Burns, P. C., Parkes, A., Burton, S., Smith, R. K., & Burch, D. How dangerous is driving with a mobile phone? Benchmarking the impairment to alcohol, TRL Report TRL547. 2002.
23. Reed, M. P., Green, P. A.. Comparison of driving performance on-road and in low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics, 1999,42, 1015-1037.
24. Jenness, J. W., Lattanzio, R. J., O'Toole, M., et al. Voice-activated dialling or eating a cheeseburger: Which is more distracting during simulated driving? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, 2002
25. Gärtner U., & Konig, W., & Wittig, T. Evaluation of manual vs. speech input when using a driver information system in real traffic. On-line paper. Available at http://ppc.uiowa.edu/driving-asse...nt%20Papers/ 02-Gartner-Wittig.htm. 2002
26. RoSPA. Mobile phones and driving: A literature review. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. 1997.
27. Cooper, P. J., Zheng, Y.. Turning gap acceptance decision-making: impact of driver distraction. Journal of Safety Research, 2002, 33: 321-335.