Does "game participation cost" affect the advantage of heterogeneous networks for evolving cooperation?

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Volumn 389, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2284-2289

  Tanimoto, Jun ^a   Yamauchi, Atsuo ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

2 2 dilemma game on network; Game participation cost; Heterogeneous network; Scale free network derived from Barabasi Albert algorithm

Indexed keywords

PHYSICS;

AVERAGE DEGREE; EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION; NEGATIVE VALUES; PAYOFF MATRIX; ROYAL SOCIETY;

HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS;

EID: 77949568305     PISSN: 03784371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.01.033     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Nowak M.A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314 (2006) 1560-1563
2. Tanimoto J. Dilemma-solving effects by the coevolution of both networks and strategy in a 2×2 game. Physical Review E 76 (2007) #021126
3. Santos F., and Pacheco J. Scale free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Physical Review Letters 95 (2005) #098104
4. Santos F., Rodrigues J., and Pacheco J. Graph topology plays a determinant role in the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273 (2006) 51-55
5. Barabasi A.L., and Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (1999) 509-512
6. Masuda N. Participation costs dismiss the advantage of heterogeneous networks in evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 (2007) 1815-1821
7. Tanimoto J., and Sagara H. Relationship between dilemma occurrence and the existence of a weakly dominant strategy in a two-player symmetric game. BioSystems 90 1 (2007) 105-114
8. Newman M.E.J. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters 89 20 (2002) #208701
9. Xulvi-Brunet R., and Sokolov I.M. Reshuffling scale-free networks: From random to assortative. Physical Review E 70 (2004) #066102