Accumulation of end products in source leaves affects photosynthetic rate in peach via alteration of stomatal conductance and photosynthetic efficiency

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 134, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 667-676

  Cheng, Jieshan ^a   Fan, Peige ^a   Liang, Zhenchang ^a   Wang, Yanqiu ^a   Niu, Ning ^a   Li, Weidong ^b   Li, Shaohua ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE MEDICINE   (China)

^c Wuhan Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

Author keywords

Enzyme activities; Fluorescence response; Leaf temperature; Prunus persica; Source sink relationship

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 77949565671     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.134.6.667     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cheng, Y.H., O. Arakawa, M. Kasai, and S. Sawada. 2008. Analysis of reduced photosynthesis in the apple leaf under sink-limited conditions due to girdling. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77:115-121.
2. DaMatta, F.M., R.L. Cunha, W.C. Antunes, S.C.V. Martins, W.L. Araujo, A.R. Fernie, and G.A.B.K. Moraes. 2008. In field-grown coffee trees source-sink manipulation alters photosynthetic rates, independently of carbon metabolism, via alterations in stomatal function. New Phytol. 178:348-357.
3. DeJong, T.M. 1986. Fruit effects on photosynthesis in Prunus persica. Physiol. Plant. 66:149-153.
4. Duan, W., P.G. Fan, L.J. Wang, W.D. Li, S.T. Yan, and S.H. Li. 2008. Photosynthesis response to low sink demand by fruit removal in relation to photochemistry efficiency, photoinhibition, and photoprotection in peach trees. Tree Physiol. 28:123-132.
5. Eliezer, E.G. and S.C. Huber. 1992. Regulation of photosynthesis by end product accumulation in leaves of plants storing starch, sucrose, and hexose sugars. Plant Physiol. 99:1443-1448.
6. Genty, B., J.M. Briantais, and N.R. Baker. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990: 87-92.
7. Gibson, S.I. 2005. Control of plant development and gene expression by sugar signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8:93-102.
8. Huber, S.C. and D.W. Israel. 1982. Biochemical basis for partitioning of photosynthetically fixed carbon between starch and sucrose in soybean (Glycine max Merr.) leaves. Plant Physiol. 69:691-696.
9. Iglesias, D.J., I. Lliso, F.R. Tadeo, and M. Talon. 2002. Regulation of photosynthesis through source: Sink imbalance in citrus is mediated by carbohydrate content in leaves. Physiol. Plant. 116:563-572.
10. Ivanov, B. and G. Edwards. 2000. Influence of ascorbate and the Mehler peroxidase reaction on non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in maize mesophyll chloroplasts. Planta 210:765-774.
11. Jifon, J.L. and J.P. Syvertsen. 2003. Moderate shade can increase net gas exchange and reduce photoinhibition in citrus leaves. Tree Physiol. 23:119-127.
12. Layne, D.R. and J.A. Flore. 1995. End-product inhibition of photosynthesis in Prunus cerasus L. in response to whole-plant sourcesink manipulation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:583-599.
13. Li, S.H., M. Génard, C. Bussi, J.G. Huguet, R. Habib, J. Besset, and R. Laurent. 2001. Fruit quality and leaf photosynthesis in response to microenvironment modification around individual fruit by covering the fruit with plastic in nectarine and peach trees. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 76:61-69.
14. Li, S.H., X.P. Zhang, Z.Q. Meng, and X. Wang. 1994. Response of peach tree to modified pruning. I. Vegetative growth. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 22:401-409.
15. Li, T.H. and S.H. Li. 2005. Leaf responses of micropropagated apple plants to water stress: Nonstructural carbohydrate composition and regulatory role of metabolic enzymes. Tree Physiol. 25:495-504.
16. Li, W.D., S.H. Li, S.H. Yang, J.M. Yang, X.B. Zheng, X.D. Li, and H.M. Yao. 2005. Photosynthesis in response to source-sink manipulation during different phenological stages of fruit development in peach trees: Regulation by stomatal aperture and leaf temperature. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 80:481-487.
17. Li, W.D., W. Duan, P.G. Fan, S.T. Yan, and S.H. Li. 2007. Photosynthesis in response to source-sink activity and in relation to end products and activities of metabolic enzymes in peach trees. Tree Physiol. 27:1307-1318.
18. Lloyd, J.C. and O.V. Zakhleniuk. 2004. Responses of primary and secondary metabolism to sugar accumulation revealed by microarray expression analysis of the arabidopsis mutant, pho3. J. Expt. Bot. 55:1221-1230.
19. Loescher, W.H. 1987. Physiology and metabolism of sugars alcohols in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 70:553-557.
20. Lunn, J.E. and M.D. Hatch. 1995. Primary partitioning and storage of photosynthate in sucrose and starch in leaves of C4 plants. Planta 197:385-391.
21. Merlo, L. and C. Passera. 1991. Changes in carbohydrate and enzyme levels during development of leaves of Prunus persica, a sorbitol synthesizing species. Physiol. Plant. 83:621-626.
22. Nautiyal, P.C., V. Ravindra, and Y.C. Joshi. 1999. Net photosynthetic rate in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Influence of leaf position, time of day, and reproductive-sink. Photosynthetica 36:129-138.
23. Negm, F.B. and W.H. Loescher. 1979. Detection and characterization of sorbitol dehydrogenase from apple callus tissue. Plant Physiol. 64: 69-73.
24. Paul, M.J. and C.H. Foyer. 2001. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J. Expt. Bot. 52:1383-1400.
25. Paul, M.J. and T.K. Pellny. 2003. Carbon metabolite feedback regulation of leaf photosynthesis and development. J. Expt. Bot. 54: 539-547.
26. Roitsch, T. 1999. Source-sink regulation by sugar and stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2:198-206.
27. Roper, T.R., J.D. Keller, W.H. Loescher, and C.R. Rom. 1988. Photosynthesis and carbohydrate partitioning in sweet cherry: Fruiting effects. Physiol. Plant. 72:42-47.
28. Rufty, T.W., P.S. Kerr, and S.C. Huber. 1983. Characterization of diurnal changes in activities of enzymes involved in sucrose biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 73:428-433.
29. 2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant Cell Environ. 14:741-762.
30. Syvertsen, J.P., C. Goni, and A. Otero. 2003. Fruit load and canopy shading affect leaf characteristics and net gas exchange of 'Spring' navel orange trees. Tree Physiol. 23:899-906.
31. Tan, C.S. and B.R. Buttery. 1986. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential in response to temperature and light in peach. HortScience 21:1180-1182.
32. Vaast, P., J. Angrand, N. Franck, J. Dauzat, and M. Génard. 2005. Fruit load and branch ring-barking affect carbon allocation and photosynthesis of leaf and fruit of Coffea arabica in the field. Tree Physiol. 25:753-760.
33. Wu, B.H., H.Q. Huang, P.G. Fan, S.H. Li, and G.J. Liu. 2008. Photosynthetic responses to source-sink manipulation in five peach cultivars varying in maturity date. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 133:278-283.
34. Zhou, R. and B. Quebedeaux. 2003. Changes in photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in mature apple leaves in response to whole plant source-sink manipulation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:113-119.