Simultaneous design and control: A new approach and comparisons with existing methodologies

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2822-2833

  Ricardez Sandoval, Luis A ^a   Budman, Hector M ^a   Douglas, Peter L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSED-LOOP; CLOSED-LOOP NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL DEMANDS; DESIGN AND CONTROL; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; DYNAMIC SIMULATION; NEW APPROACHES; ORDER OF MAGNITUDE; OUTPUT VARIABILITY; PROCESS MODEL; SIMULTANEOUS DESIGN AND CONTROL; STRUCTURED SINGULAR VALUES; TENNESSEE EASTMAN PROCESS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

DESIGN;

EID: 77949524361     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie9010707     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brengel, D. D.; Seider, W. D. Coordinated design and control optimization of nonlinear processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1992, 16, 861-886.
2. Alhammadi, H. Y.; Romagnoli, J. A. Process design and operation Incorporating environmental, profitability, heat integration and controllability considerations. In The Integration of Process Design and Control; Seferlis, P., Georgiadis, M. C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2004; pp 264-305.
3. Luyben, M. L.; Floudas, C. A. Analyzing the interaction of design and control-1. A multiobjective framework and application to binary distillation synthesis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 933-969.
4. Palazoglu, A.; Arkun, Y. A multiobjective approach to design chemical plants with robust dynamic operability characteristics. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1986, 10, 567-575
5. Lenhoff, A. M.; Morari, M. Design of Resilient processing plants- 1. Process design under consideration of dynamic aspects. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1982, 37, 245-258.
6. Perkins, J. D.; Walsh, S. P. K. Optimization as a tool for design/ control integration. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 315-323.
7. Mohideen, M. J.; Perkins, J. D.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty. AIChE J. 1996, 42, 2251-2272.
8. Kookos, I. K.; Perkins, J. D. An algorithm for simultaneous process design and control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 4079-4088.
9. Bahri, P. A.; Bandoni, J. A.; Romagnoli, J. A. Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 997-1015.
10. Swartz, C. L. E. The use of controller parametrization in the integration of design and control. In The Integration of Process Design and Control; Seferlis, P., Georgiadis, M. C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam 2004; pp 239-263.
11. Bansal, V.; Perkins, J. D.; Pistikopoulos, E. N.; Ross, R.; van Schijndel, J. M. G. Simultaneous design and control optimization under uncertainty. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 261-266.
12. Sakizlis, V.; Perkins, J. D.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. Recent advances in optimization-based simultaneous process and control design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 2069-2086.
13. Schweiger, C. A.; Floudas, C. A. Interaction of design and control: optimization with dynamic models. In Optimal Control; Hager, W. H., Padarlos, P. M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: The Netherlands, 1998; pp 388-435.
14. Fuente, D. L.; Flores-Tlacuahuac, A. Recent advances in optimization- based simultaneous process and control design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 1933-1943.
15. Malcolm, A.; Polan, J.; Zhang, L.; Ogunnaike, B. A.; Linninger, A. A. Integrating systems design and control using dynamic flexibility analysis. AIChE J. 2007, 53, 2048-2061.
16. Chawankul, N.; Ricardez Sandoval, L. A.; Budman, H.; Douglas, P. L. Integration of design and control: A robust control approach using MPC. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2007, 85, 433-446.
17. Monnigmann, M.; Marquardt, W. Steady-state process optimization with guaranteed robust stability and feasibility. AIChE J. 2003, 49, 3110-3126.
18. Grosch, R.; Monnigmann, M.; Marquardt, W. Integrated design and control for robust performance: Application to an MSMPR crystallizer. J. Process Control 2008, 18, 173-188.
19. Ricardez Sandoval, L. A.; Budman, H. M.; Douglas, P. L. Simultaneous design and control of processes under uncertainty: A robust modelling approach. J. Process Control 2008, 18, 735-752.
20. Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A.; Budman, H. M.; Douglas, P. L. Application of robust control tools to the simultaneous design and control of dynamic systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 813-813
21. Seferlis, P.; Georgiadis, M. C. In The Integration of Process Design and Control; Seferlis, P., Georgiadis, M. C., Eds.; Elsevier, Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004.
22. Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A.; Budman, H. M.; Douglas, P. L. Integration of design and control for chemical processes: A review of the literature and some recent results. Annu. Rev. Control 2009, 33, 158-171.
23. Monnigmann, M.; Marquardt, W. Steady-state process optimization with guaranteed robust stability and flexibility: Application to HDA reaction section. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 2737-2753.
24. Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A.; Budman, H. M.; Douglas, P. L. Simultaneous design and control of chemical processes with application to the Tennessee Eastman process. J. Process Control 2009, 19, 1377-1391.
25. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. Plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 245-255.
26. Ramirez, E.; Gani, R. Methodology for the design and analysis of reaction separation systems with recycle. 2.- Design and control integration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 8084-8100.
27. Wu, K.; Yu, C. Operability for processes with recycles: interaction between design and operation with application to the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 2239-2251.
28. Ljung, L. System Identification: Theory for the User, 1st ed.; Prentice Hall: New York, 1987.
29. Doyle, J. Analysis of feedback systems with structured uncertainties. IEEE Proc., Part D: Control Theory Appl. 1982, 129, 242-250.
30. Fan, M. K. H.; Tits, A. L.; Doyle, J. C. Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1991, 36, 25-38.
31. Braatz, R. D.; Lee, J. H.; Morari, M. Screening plant designs and control structures for uncertain systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 463-468.
32. Lee, J. H.; Braatz, R. D.; Morari, M.; Packard, A. Screening tools for robust control structure selection. Automatica 1995, 31, 229-235.
33. Ma, D. L.; Chung, S. H.; Braatz, R. D. Worst-case performance analysis of optimal batch control trajectories. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 1469-1476.
34. Nagy, Z. K.; Braatz, R. D. Worst-case and distributional robustness analysis of finite-time control trajectories for nonlinear distributed parameter systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2003, 11, 694-704.
35. Ricker, N. L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. J. Process Control 1996, 6, 205-221.
36. Larsson, T.; Hestetun, K.; Hovland, E.; Skogestad, S. Selfoptimizing control of a large-scale plant: The tennessee eastman process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 4889-4901.
37. Seider, W. D.; Seader, J. D.; Lewin, D. R. Product and process design principles, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 2004.
38. Optimization Toolbox, For Use with MATLAB; The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA, 2006.
39. Bertsekas, D. P. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control; Athena Scientific: Nashua, 2007; Vols. I and II.