Consistent paternity skew through ontogeny in peron's tree frog (Litoria peronii)

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2009, Pages

  Sherman, Craig D H ^a   Wapstra, Erik ^b   Olsson, Mats ^c  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO MORTALITY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FROG; MALE; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; PATERNITY; PERON TREE FROG; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION; TADPOLE; ANIMAL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION; FROGS AND TOADS; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SPERMATOZOON;

AMPHIBIA; HYLIDAE; LITORIA PERONII;

ANIMALS; ANURA; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION; MALE; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 77949508289     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008252     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Firman RC, Simmons LW (2008) Polyandry facilitates postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Evolution: doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00307.x.
2. Sherman CDH, Wapstra E, Uller T, Olsson M (2008) Males with high genetic similarity to females sire more offspring in sperm competition in Peron's tree frog Litoria peronii. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275: 971-978.
3. Stockley P (1997) No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264: 1497-1500.
4. Wedekind C, Chapuisat M, Macas E, Rulicke T (1996) Non-random fertilization in mice correlates with the MHC and something else. Heredity 77: 400-409.
5. Rulicke T, Chapuisat M, Homberger FR, Macas E, Wedekind C (1998) MHC-genotype of progeny influenced by parental infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265: 711-716.
6. Dziminski MA, Roberts JD (2006) Fitness consequences of variable maternal provisioning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 144-155.
7. Dziminski MA, Roberts JD, Simmons LW (2008) Fitness consequences of parental compatibility in the frog Crinia georgiana. Evolution 62: 879-886.
8. Evans JP, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Marshall DJ (2007) Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin. Evolution 61: 2832-2838.
9. Marshall DJ, Evans JP (2005) The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 735-741.
10. Sherman CDH, Wapstra E, Olsson M (2009) Consistent male-male paternity differences across female genotypes. Biology Letters 5: 232-234.
11. Garcia-Gonzalez F (2008) Male genetic quality and the inequality between paternity success and fertilization success: Consequences for studies of sperm competition and the evolution of polyandry. Evolution 62: 1653-1665.
12. Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW (2007) Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry. Current Biology 17: 32-36.
13. Browne RK, Seratt J, Vance C, Kouba A (2006) Hormonal priming, induction of ovulation and in-vitro fertilization of the endangered Wyoming toad (Bufo baxteri). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 4: 34. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-1184-1134.
14. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Wysocki CJ, Bard J, Thomas L, et al. (1983) Recognition of H-2 types in relation the the blocking of pregnancy in mice. Science 221: 186-188.
15. Newcomer SD, Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1999) Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 10236-10241.
16. Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
17. Fisher DO, Double MC, Blomberg SP, Jennions MD, Cockburn A (2006) Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature 444: 89-92.
18. Sherman CDH, Wapstra E, Olsson M (2009) Sperm competition and offspring viability at hybridization in Australian tree frogs, Litoria peronii and L. tyleri. Heredity: in press.
19. Griffiths K (2006) Frogs and reptiles of the Sydney region. Sydney: New Holland.
20. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183-190.
21. Sherman CDH, Olsson M (2007) Polymorphic microsatellite loci in the Australian tree frog, Litoria peronii. Conservation Genetics 8: 999-1001.
22. McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1: 30-46.