Liquid-based cytology vs conventional cytology in detecting cervical cancer

JAMA

Volumn 303, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1034-

  Saraiya, Mona ^a   Benard, Vicki ^a   Miller, Jacqueline ^a  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 77949504593     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.277     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Schiffman M, Solomon D. Screening and prevention methods for cervical cancer. JAMA. 2009;302(16):1809-1810.
2. Siebers AG, Klinkhamer PJ, Grefte JM, et al. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology for detection of cervical cancer precursors: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302(16):1757-1764.
3. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/ about.htm. Accessed December 30, 2009.
4. Yabroff KR, Saraiya M, Meissner HI, et al. Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of Papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(9):602-611.
5. Saraiya M, Irwin KL, Carlin L, et al. Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). Cancer. 2007;110(5):1024-1032.