The time-cost trade-off analysis inconstruction project using computer simulation and interactive procedure;Statybos projekto lai koir kainos suderinamumo analizė, grindžiama kom piuterin iu modeliavimu ir intera ktyviu metodu

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 523-539

  Błaszczyk, Tomasz ^a   Nowak, Maciej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS IN KATOWICE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Interactive approach; Multi criteria decision aiding; Project planning; Simulation; Time cost trade off

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949489264     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.523-539     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akkan, C.; Drexl, A. and Kimms, A. 2005. Network decomposition-based benchmark results for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem, European Journal of Operational Research 165: 339-358. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.006.
2. Ang, A. 1975. Analysis of activity network under uncertainty, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 101: 373-387.
3. Chanas, S. and Kamburowski, J. 1981. The use of fuzzy variables in PERT, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 5: 11-19. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(81)90030-0.
4. Chen, P.-H. 2008. Integration of cost and schedule using extensive matrix method and spreadsheets, Automation in Construction 18: 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.009
5. Chua, D. K. H.; Chan, W. T., and Govindan, K. 1997. A time-cost trade-off model with resource consideration using genetic algorithm, Civil Engineering Systems 14: 291-311. doi:10.1080/026302597 08970224.
6. Elmaghraby, S. E. 1977. Activity Networks - Project Planning and Control by Network Models. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
7. Feng, C. W.; Liu, L., and Burns, S. A. 1997. Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 11: 184-189.
8. Fulkerson, D. R. 1961. A network flow computation for project cost curves, Management Science 7: 167-178. doi:10.1287/mnsc.7.2.167.
9. Goldratt, E. 1997. Critical Chain. The North River Press, Great Barrington.
10. Hadar, J. and Russel, W. R. 1969. Rules for ordering uncertain prospects, The American Economic Review 59: 25-34.
11. Hapke, M. and Słowiński, R. 1996. Fuzzy priority heuristics for project scheduling, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 8: 291-299. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(95)00338-X.
12. Harvey, R. T., and Patterson, J. H. 1979. An implicit enumeration algorithm for the time/cost tradeoff problem in project network analysis, Foundations of Control Engineering 4: 107-117.
13. Hindelang, T. J., and Muth, J. F. 1979. A dynamic programming algorithm for decision CPM networks, Operations Research 27: 225-241. doi:10.1287/opre.27.2.225.
14. Huang, C. C.; Kira, D. and Vertinsky, I. 1978. Stochastic dominance rules for multiattribute utility functions, Review of Economic Studies 41: 611-616. doi:10.2307/2297262.
15. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York.
16. Kelley, J. E. 1961. Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis, Operations Research 9: 296-320. doi:10.1287/opre.9.3.296.
17. Leu, S.-S.; Chen, A.-T., and Yang, Ch.-H. 2001. A GA-based fuzzy optimal model for construction time-cost trade-off, International Journal of Project Management 19: 47-58. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00035-6.
18. Moselhi, O. 1993. Schedule compression using the direct stiffness method, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 20: 65-72.
19. Moselhi, O. and Deb, B. 1993. Project selection considering risk, Construction Management and Economics 11: 45-52. doi:10.1080/01446199300000063.
20. Nowak, M. 2005. Investment projects evaluation by simulation and multiple criteria decision aiding procedure, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 11: 193-202.
21. Nowak, M. 2006. INSDECM - an interactive procedure for stochastic multicriteria decision problems, European Journal of Operational Research 175: 1413-1430. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.016.
22. Ogryczak, W., and Ruszczyński, A. 1999. From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures, European Journal of Operational Research 116: 33-50. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00167-2.
23. Ogryczak, W., and Ruszczyński, A. 2001. On consistency of stochastic dominance and mean-semideviation models, Mathematical Programming 89: 217-232. doi:10.1007/PL00011396.
24. Siemens, N. 1971. A simple CPM time-cost trade-off algorithm, Management Science 17: 354-363. doi:10.1287/mnsc.17.6.B354.
25. Skutella, M. 1998. Approximation algorithms for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem, Mathematics of Operations Research 23: 195-203. doi:10.1287/moor.23.4.909.
26. Wong, E. T. T.; Norman, G., and Flanagan, R. 2000. A fuzzy stochastic technique for project selection, Construction Management and Economics 18: 407-414. doi:10.1080/01446190050024824.
27. Zaras, K. and Martel, J. M. 1994. Multiattribute analysis based on stochastic dominance, in Munier, B. and Machina, M. J. (Eds.). Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 225-248.