Translation of the Scientific Method ... Peer Review

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 485-487

  Scarfe, William C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DENTAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE; STANDARD;

DECISION MAKING; DENTAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENCE;

EID: 77949488665     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Spier R.E. The history of the peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol 20 (2002) 357-358
2. Benos D.J., Bashari E., Chaves J.M., Gaggar A., Kapoor N., LaFrance M., et al. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ 31 (2007) 145-152
3. Peirce C.S. The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly 12 (1877) 1-15
4. rd edition (2005), Churchill-Livingstone, Philadelphia, PA 173-177
5. Jefferson T., Rudin M., Brodney Folse S., and Davidoff F. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 (2007) MR000016
6. Jefferson T., Wager E., and Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA 287 (2002) 2786-2790
7. Benos D.J., Kirk K.L., and Hall J.E. How to review a paper. Advan Physiol Educ 27 (2003) 47-52
8. Provenzale J.M., and Stanley R.J. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 848-854