CAQDAS-GIS convergence: Toward a new integrated mixed method research practice?

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 349-370

  Fielding, Nigel ^a   Cisneros Puebla, César A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Data integration; Geo referencing mixed methods; GIS; Qualitative software

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949417406     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689809344973     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amsden, J., & VanWynsberghe, R. (2005). Community mapping as a research tool with youth. Action Research, 3, 357-381.
2. Andes, K.L. & Cisneros-Puebla, C. (2009). Salud Sexual y Reproductiva en Adolescentes en Asuncion, Paraguay: Una Evaluacion Cualitativa de Necesidades. Asuncion, Paraguay, South America: Centro Paraguayo de Estudios de Poblacion (CEPEP).
3. Bazeley, P. (2003) Computerized data analysis for mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 385-422). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. Bazeley, P. (2004). Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In R. Buber, J. Gadner, & L. Richards (Eds.), Applying qualitative methods to marketing management research (pp. 141-156). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
5. Bazeley, P. (2006). The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analysis. Research in the Schools, 13, 63-73.
6. Carmichael, P. (2002, May). Extensible mark-up language and qualitative data analysis. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, 3(2). Retrieved July 27, 2009, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02carmichael-e.htm.
7. Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
8. Creswell, J. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 95-108.
9. Creswell, J., & Plano-Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10. DeLyser, D., Aitken, S., Crang, M., Herbert, S., & McDowell, L. (2009). Handbook of qualitative research in human geography, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11. Doel, M. (2001). Qualified quantitative geography. Environment and Planning D, 19, 555-572.
12. Egenhofer, M., & Mark, D. (1995). Naïïve geography. In A. Frank & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 988, pp. 1-15). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
13. Elwood, S. (2006). Participatory GIS and community planning. In S. Balram & S. Dragicevic (Eds.), Collaborative geographic information systems (pp. 66-84). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
14. Elwood, S., Feliciano, R., Gems, K., Gulasingam, N., Howard, W., Mackin, R.,et al.(2007). Participatory GIS: The Humboldt/West Humboldt park community GIS project. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 170-178). New York: Routledge.
15. Fetters, M., Yoshioka, T., Greenberg, G., Gorenflo, D., & Yeo, S. (2007). Advanced consent in Japanese during prenatal care. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 333-365.
16. Fielding, N.G., & Lee, R.M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. London: SAGE.
17. Fielding, N.G., & Lee, R.M. (2002). New patterns in the adoption and use of qualitative software. Field Methods, 14, 197-216.
18. Goodchild, M., Anselin, L., Appelbaum, R., & Harthorn, B. (2000). Toward spatially integrated social science. International Regional Science Review, 23, 139-159.
19. Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
20. Greene, J. (2008). Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 1, 7-22.
21. Haraway, D. (1996). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial knowledge. In J. Agnew, D. N. Livingstone, & A. Rodgers (Eds.), Human geography: An essential anthology (pp. 108-128). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
22. Harris, T.M., Weiner, D., Warner, T., & Levin, R. (1995). Pursuing social goals through participatory GIS. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth (pp. 196-222). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
24. Jung, K.-I. (2009). Computer-aided qualitative GIS: A software-level integration of qualitative research and GIS. In M. Cope & S. Elwood (Ed.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. (pp.115-135) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25. Kelle, U. (1996). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26. Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A, 38, 2021-2037.
27. Kuckartz, U. (1995). Case-oriented quantification. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28. Kwan, M.-P. (2002a). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 645-661.
29. Kwan, M.-P. (2002b). Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 271-279.
30. Kwan, M.-P. (2007). Critical GIS. In K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geographic information science (pp. 56-57). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31. Kwan, M.-P., & Ding, G. (2008). Geo-narrative: Extending GIS for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed method research. The Professional Geographer, 60(4), 1-30.
32. Kwan, M.-P., & Lee, J. (2004). Geovisualisation of human activity patterns using 3D GIS. In M. Goodchild & D. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 48-66). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
33. Lee, Y.-J., & Greene, J. (2007). The predictive validity of an ESL placement test. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 366-389.
34. Marble, D. (1990). The potential methodological impact of geographic information systems on the social sciences. In K. Allen, S. Green, & E. Zubrow (Eds.), Interpreting space: GIS and archaelogy (pp. 9-21). London: Taylor & Francis.
35. Matthews, S., Detwiler, J., & Burton, L. (2005). Geo-ethnography: Coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica, 40(4), 75-90.
36. Mertens, D. (2003). Mixed models and the politics of human research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37. Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
38. Nightingale, A. (2003). A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2, 77-90.
39. Pavlovskaya, M.E. (2002). Mapping urban change and changing GIS. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9, 281-289.
40. Pavlovskaya, M.E. (2006). Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A, 38, 2003-2020.
41. Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographical information systems. New York: Guilford.
42. Pickles, J. (2006). Commentary: Ground truth 1995-2005. Transactions in GIS, 10, 763-772.
43. Rossman, G., & Wilson, B. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
44. Ruvane, M., & Dobbs, R. (2008) Genealogy, historical geography, and GIS: Parcel mapping, information synergies, and collaborative opportunities. In D. J. Timothy & J. K. Guelke (Eds.), Geography and genealogy (pp. 43-61). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
45. Schuurman, N. (2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 569-590.
46. Schuurman, N. (2006). Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(4), 726-739.
47. Sheppard, E. (2005). Knowledge production through critical GIS. Cartographica, 40(4), 5-21.
48. Skinner, D., Matthews, S.A. & Burton, L.M. (2005). Combining ethnography and GIS technology to examine constructions of developmental opportunities in contexts of poverty and disability. In T. S. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children's development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life (pp. 223-239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Sullivan, D. (2006). Geographical information science: critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 783-791.
50. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51. Weitzman, E. & Miles, M. (1995). Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52. Weir, S.S., Morroni, C., Coetzee, N., Spencer, J., & Boerma, J.T. (2002). A pilot study of a rapid assessment method to identify places for AIDS prevention in Cape Town, South Africa. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 78(Suppl. I), i106-i113.