How long is the peer review process for journal manuscripts? A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Chimia

Volumn 64, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 72-77

  Bornmann, Lutz ^a   Daniel, Hans Dieter ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Journal peer review; Peer review time

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949416761     PISSN: 00094293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2010.72     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. R. K. Merton, Am. Sociol. Rev. 1957, 22, 635.
2. C. G. Jennings, 'Quality and value: the true purpose of peer review. What you can't measure, you can't manage: the need for quantitative indicators in peer review', retrieved July 6, 2006, from http://www.nature.com/nature/ peerreview/debate/nature05032.html, 2006.
3. O. F. Azar, Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2004, 31, 259.
4. I. Hames, 'Peer review and manuscript management of scientific journals: guidelines for good practice', Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2007.
5. Publishing Research Consortium, 'Peer review in scholarly journals: perspective of the scholarly community - an international study', Publishing Research Consortium, Bristol, UK, 2008.
6. O. Mryglod, Y. Holovatch, 'Towards journalometrical analysis of a scientific periodical: a case study', retrieved May 5, from http://arxiv.org/ abs/0707.3696, 2008.
7. P. Gupta, G. Kaur, B. Sharma, D. Shah, P. Choudhury, Indian Pediatrics 2006, 43, 479.
8. T. Stamm, U. Meyer, H.-P. Wiesmann, J. Kleinheinz, M. Cehreli, C. C. Zafer, Head Face Med. 2007, 3, 27.
9. S. M. Green, M. L. Callaham, Ann. Emerg. Med. 2006, 48, 304.
10. J. Ely, M. Woolley, F. Lynch, J. McDonald, L. Findlay, Y. Choi, K. Woolley, in 5th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Eds. D. Rennie, F. Godlee, A. Flanagin, J. Smith, Chicago, IL, USA, 2005.
11. L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 2008, 59, 1841.
12. L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7173.
13. L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, Learned Publishing 2009, 22, 117.
14. L. Bornmann, C. Weymuth, H.-D. Daniel, Scientometrics, doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0011-4.
15. G. Yu, Y. J. Li, D. R. Yu, J. Inf. Sci. 2009, 35, 414.
16. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 'Current practice in peer review. Results of a survey conducted during Oct/Nov 2000', Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, Worthing, UK, 2000.
17. L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, Libr. Inf. Sci. Res., doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2009. 07.010.
18. H.-D. Daniel, 'Guardians of science. Fairness and reliability of peer review', Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1993.
19. P. Gölitz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5538.
20. R. M. Conroy, Stata J. 2002, 2, 290.
21. R. B. Kline, 'Beyond significance testing: reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research', American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
22. J. Cohen, 'Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences', 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988.
23. D. R. de Vries, E. A. Marschall, R. A. Stein, Fisheries 2009, 34, 270.
24. P. Gölitz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5030.
25. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 'Guidelines for Authors', retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://pubs.acs.org/paragonplus/submission/jacsat/ jacsat-authguide.pdf, 2008.
26. C. Neuhaus, W. Marx, H.-D. Daniel, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 60, 176.
27. P. Gölitz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7144.