Editorial: Rescaling the state: New modes of institutional-territorial organization

Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-12

  Lobao, Linda ^a   Martin, Ron ^b   Rodríguez Pose, Andrés ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949398836     PISSN: 17521378     EISSN: 17521386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsp001     Document Type: Editorial

References (50)

1. Amin, A. (1994) Post-Fordism: models, fantasies, and phantoms of transition. In A. Amin (ed.). Post-Fordism: A Reader, pp. 1-39. Oxford: Blackwell
2. Amin A, Tomaney J. (1995). Behind the Myth of European Union: Prospects for Cohesion. London: Routledge
3. Armstrong, H. W. (1995) An appraisal of the evidence from cross-sectional analysis of the regional growth process within the European Union. In H.W. Armstrong and R.W. Vickerman (eds.). Convergence and Divergence among European Regions, pp. 40-65. London: Pion
4. Barro, R. J. and Sala-I-Martín, X. X. (1991) Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 107-182
5. Brenner, N. (1999) Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36: 431-451
6. Brenner, N. (2003) Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10: 297-324
7. Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press
8. Brenner, N. (2009) Open questions on state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2
9. Buchs, M. (2009) Examining the interaction between vertical and horizontal dimensions of rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2
10. Cairncross, F. (1997) The Death of Distance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
11. Cox, K. R. (1997) Introduction: globalization and its politics in question. In K. Cox (ed.). Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local, pp. 1-18. New York: Guilford
12. Cox, K. (2009) Rescaling the state in question. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2
13. Donahue, J. D. (1997) Disunited States. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Basic Books
14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
15. Goodwin, M., Jones, M. and Jones, R. (2005) Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state. Regional Studies, 39: 4421-4436
16. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1995) Globalization and the future of the nation-state. Economy and Society, 24: 408-442
17. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999) Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press
18. Hooghe, L. (1996) Building a Europe with the regions: the changing role of the European Commission. In L. Hooghe (ed.). Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press
19. Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. Oxford: Blackwell
20. Jessop, B. (1993) From the Keynesian welfare to the Schumpeterian- workfare state. In R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds.). Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?, pp. 13-37. London: Routledge
21. Jessop, B. (1995) The future of the nation state in Europe: erosion or reorganization? WP50, Political Economy of Local Governance Series. Lancaster: Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster
22. Jessop, B. (2000) The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24: 323-360
23. Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press
24. Jessop, B. (2004) Hollowing out the nation-state and multilevel governance. In Patricia Kennett (ed.). Handbook of Comparative Social Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 11-25
25. Jones, M. (2001) The rise of the regional state in economic governance: 'partnerships for prosperity' or new scales of state power? Environment and Planning A, 33: 1185-1211
26. Keating, M. (1997) The invention of regions: political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15: 383-398
27. Keating, M., Cairney, P. and Hepburn, E. (2009) Territorial policy communities and devolution in the United Kingdom. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2
28. Lobao, L. (2007) The local state, decentralization, and neoliberal roll-out: a comparative subnational analysis of growth and redistribution responses. Research in Political Sociology, 16: 85-118
29. López-Bazo, E., Vayá, E. and Mora, A. J., et al. (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Annals of Regional Science, 33: 343-370
30. MacLeod, G. and Goodwin, M. (1999) Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale, and explanation. Political Geography, 18: 697-730
31. Mansfield, B. (2005) Beyond rescaling: reintegrating the 'national' as a dimension of scalar relations. Progress in Human Geography, 29: 258-273
32. Marston, S., Jones III., J. P. and Woodward, K. (2005) Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30: 416-432
33. Martin, R. L. and Sunley, P. J. (1997) The post-Keynesian state and the space economy. In R. Lee and J. Wills (eds.). Geographies of Economies, pp. 278-289. London: Arnold
34. Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Timofeev, T. (2009) A fiscal perspective of state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2
35. Milward, A. S. (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
36. Moore, A. (2008) Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography, 32: 203-225
37. O'Brien, R. (1992) Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs
38. Ohmae, K. (1995) The End of the Nation-State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: The Free Press
39. Painter, J. (2001) State and governance. In E. Sheppard and T. Barnes (eds.). A Companion to Economic Geography, pp. 359-376. Oxford: Blackwell
40. Peck, J. (2001) Neoliberalising states. Progress in Human Geography, 25: 445-455
41. Peck, J. and Tickell, (1994) Searching for a new institutional fix: the after-Fordist crisis and the local-global disorder. In A. Amin (ed.). Post-Fordism: A Reader, pp. 280-315. Oxford: Blackwell
42. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. (2007) What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies, 41: 1253-1269
43. Pike, A. and Tomaney, J. (2009) Sub-national governance and economic development: the case of England in post-devolution UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2:
44. Radice, H. (1984) The national economy: a Keynesian myth. Capital and Class, 22: 111-140
45. Razin, E. (2000) The impact of local government organization on development and disparities: a comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C, 18: 17-31
46. Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N. (2003) The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21: 333-351
47. Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Sandall, R. (2008) From identity to the economy: analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26: 54-72
48. Scarpa, S. (2009) The scalar dimension of welfare state development: the case of Swedish and Finnish assistance systems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 2
49. Schram, S., Fording, R. C. and Soss, J. (2008) Neo-liberal poverty governance: race, place, and the punitive turn in U.S. welfare policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, 1: 17-36
50. Tomaney, J. and Ward, N. (2000) England and the 'new regionalism'. Regional Studies, 34: 471-478