Calcium imaging in the ant Camponotus fellah reveals a conserved odour-similarity space in insects and mammals

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Dupuy, Fabienne ^a   Josens, Roxana ^b   Giurfa, Martin ^a   Sandoz, Jean Christophe ^a,c  

^a Université Paul Sabatier   (France)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANT; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CAMPONOTUS FELLAH; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; MAMMAL; NERVE CELL; NEUROIMAGING; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ANIMAL; BEE; BRAIN; EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOLUTION; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SMELLING; STIMULATION; TIME;

ANIMALS; ANTS; BEES; BRAIN; CALCIUM; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOLUTION; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONS; ODORS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; RATS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77949388275     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-28     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Chittka L, Brockmann A. Perception space--the final frontier. PLoS Biol 2005, 3:e137. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030137, 1074815, 15819608.
2. Hansson BS, Anton S. Function and morphology of the antennal lobe: new developments. Ann Rev Entomol 2000, 45:203-231.
3. Schoenfeld TA, Cleland TA. The anatomical logic of smell. Trends Neurosci 2005, 28:620-627. 10.1016/j.tins.2005.09.005, 16182387.
4. Couto A, Alenius M, Dickson BJ. Molecular, anatomical, and functional organization of the Drosophila olfactory system. Curr Biol 2005, 15:1535-1547. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.034, 16139208.
5. Wachowiak M, Shipley MT. Coding and synaptic processing of sensory information in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2006, 17:411-423. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.04.007, 16765614.
6. Imamura K, Mataga N, Mori K. Coding of odor molecules by mitral/tufted cells in rabbit olfactory bulb. I. Aliphatic compounds. J Neurophysiol 1992, 68:1986-2002.
7. de Bruyne M, Foster K, Carlson JR. Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna. Neuron 2001, 30:537-552. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00289-6, 11395013.
8. Lei H, Christensen TA, Hildebrand JG. Spatial and temporal organization of ensemble representations for different odor classes in the moth antennal lobe. J Neurosci 2004, 24:11108-11119. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3677-04.2004, 15590927.
9. Rostelien T, Stranden M, Borg-Karlson AK, Mustaparta H. Olfactory receptor neurons in two Heliothine moth species responding selectively to aliphatic green leaf volatiles, aromatic compounds, monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes of plant origin. Chem Senses 2005, 30:443-461. 10.1093/chemse/bji039, 15917371.
10. Hallem EA, Carlson JR. Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire. Cell 2006, 125:143-160. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.050, 16615896.
11. Bhandawat V, Olsen SR, Gouwens NW, Schlief ML, Wilson RI. Sensory processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe increases reliability and separability of ensemble odor representations. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:1474-1482. 10.1038/nn1976, 17922008.
12. Galizia CG, Sachse S, Rappert A, Menzel R. The glomerular code for odor representation is species specific in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:473-478. 10.1038/8144, 10321253.
13. Rubin BD, Katz LC. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 1999, 23:499-511. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80803-X, 10433262.
14. Meister M, Bonhoeffer T. Tuning and topography in an odor map on the rat olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 2001, 21:1351-1360.
15. Wachowiak M, Cohen LB. Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb. Neuron 2001, 32:723-735. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00506-2, 11719211.
16. Fuss SH, Korsching SI. odorant feature detection: activity mapping of structure response relationships in the zebrafish olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 2001, 21:8396-8407.
17. Xu FQ, Liu N, Kida L, Rothman DL, Hyder F, Shepherd GM. Odor maps of aldehydes and esters revealed by functional MRI in the glomerular layer of the mouse olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:11029-11034. 10.1073/pnas.1832864100, 196921, 12963819.
18. Bozza T, McGann JP, Mombaerts P, Wachowiak M. In vivo imaging of neuronal activity by targeted expression of a genetically encoded probe in the mouse. Neuron 2004, 42:9-21. 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00144-8, 15066261.
19. Hildebrand JG, Shepherd GM. Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Ann Rev Neurosci 1997, 20:595-631. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.595, 9056726.
20. Ache BW, Young JM. Olfaction: diverse species, conserved principles. Neuron 2005, 48:417-430. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.022, 16269360.
21. Galizia CG, Menzel R. The role of glomeruli in the neural representation of odours: results from optical recording studies. J Insect Physiol 2001, 47:115-129. 10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00106-2, 11064019.
22. Johnson BA, Farahbod H, Xu Z, Saber S, Leon M. Local and global chemotopic organization: general features of the glomerular representations of aliphatic odorants differing in carbon number. J Comp Neurol 2004, 480:234-249. 10.1002/cne.20335, 15514935.
23. Mori K, Takahashi YK, Igarashi KM, Yamaguchi M. Maps of odorant molecular features in the Mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol Rev 2006, 86:409-433. 10.1152/physrev.00021.2005, 16601265.
24. Haddad R, Lapid H, Harel D, Sobel N. Measuring smells. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008, 18:438-444. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.007, 18824102.
25. Guerrieri F, Schubert M, Sandoz JC, Giurfa M. Perceptual and neural olfactory similarity in honeybees. PLoS Biol 2005, 3:e60. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030060, 1043859,1043859, 15736975.
26. Takahashi JS, Pinto LH, Hotz-Vitaterna M. Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse. Science 1994, 264:1724-1733. 10.1126/science.8209253, 8209253.
27. Wachowiak M, Cohen LB, Zochowski MR. Distributed and concentration-invariant spatial representations of odorants by receptor neuron input to the turtle olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87:1035-1045.
28. Cinelli AR, Hamilton KA, Kauer JS. Salamander olfactory bulb neuronal activity observed by video rate, voltage-sensitive dye imaging. III. Spatial and temporal properties of responses evoked by odorant stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1995, 73:2053-2071.
29. Czesnik D, Rossler W, Kirchner F, Gennerich A, Schild D. Neuronal representation of odourants in the olfactory bulb of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:113-118. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02448.x, 12534974.
30. Manzini I, Schild D. Classes and narrowing selectivity of olfactory receptor neurons of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. J Gen Physiol 2004, 123:99-107. 10.1085/jgp.200308970, 2217426, 14744986.
31. Friedrich RW, Korsching SI. Combinatorial and chemotopic odorant coding in the zebrafish olfactory bulb visualized by optical imaging. Neuron 1997, 18:737-752. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80314-1, 9182799.
32. Broome BM, Jayaraman V, Laurent G. Encoding and decoding of overlapping odor sequences. Neuron 2006, 51:467-482. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.018, 16908412.
33. Sachse S, Galizia CG. The role of inhibition for temporal and spatial odor representation in olfactory output neurons: a calcium imaging study. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87:1106-1117.
34. Galizia CG, Menzel R, Hölldobler B. Optical imaging of odour-evoked glomerular activity patterns in the antennal lobes of the ant Camponotus rufipes. Naturwissenschaften 1999, 86:533-537. 10.1007/s001140050669, 10551948.
35. Galizia CG, Sachse S, Mustaparta H. Calcium responses to pheromones and plant odours in the antennal lobe of the male and female moth Heliothis virescens. J Comp Physiol A 2000, 186:1049-1063. 10.1007/s003590000156, 11195281.
36. Hansson BS, Carlsson MA, Kalinova B. Olfactory activation patterns in the antennal lobe of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. J Comp Physiol A 2003, 189:301-308.
37. Skiri HT, Galizia CG, Mustaparta H. Representation of primary plant odorants in the antennal lobe of the moth Heliothis virescens using calcium imaging. Chem Senses 2004, 29:253-267. 10.1093/chemse/bjh026, 15047600.
38. Pelz D, Roeske T, Syed Z, de Bruyne M, Galizia CG. The molecular receptive range of an olfactory receptor in vivo (Drosophila melanogaster Or22a). J Neurobiol 2006, 66:1544-1563. 10.1002/neu.20333, 17103386.
39. Root CM, Semmelhack JL, Wong AM, Flores J, Wang JW. Propagation of olfactory information in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:11826-11831. 10.1073/pnas.0704523104, 1913902, 17596338.
40. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The ants 1990, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
41. Zube C, Kleineidam CJ, Kirschner S, Neef J, Rossler W. Organization of the olfactory pathway and odor processing in the antennal lobe of the ant Camponotus floridanus. J Comp Neurol 2008, 506:425-441. 10.1002/cne.21548, 18041786.
42. Ishii Y, Kubota K, Hara K. Postembryonic development of the mushroom bodies in the ant, Camponotus japonicus. Zoolog Sci 2005, 22:743-753. 10.2108/zsj.22.743, 16082163.
43. Gronenberg W, Holldobler B. Morphologic representation of visual and antennal information in the ant brain. J Comp Neurol 1999, 412:229-240. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<229::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-E, 10441753.
44. Gronenberg W. Modality-specific segregation of input to ant mushroom bodies. Brain Behav Evol 1999, 54:85-95. 10.1159/000006615, 10529521.
45. Gronenberg W. Subdivision of hymenopteran mushroom body calyces by their afferent supply. J Comp Neurol 2001, 436:474-489.
46. Yamagata N, Nishino H, Mizunami M. Pheromone-sensitive glomeruli in the primary olfactory centre of ants. Proc Biol Sci 2006, 273:2219-2225. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3565, 1635514, 16901842.
47. Dupuy F, Sandoz JC, Giurfa M, Josens R. Individual olfactory learning in Camponotus ants. Anim Behav 2006, 72:1081-1091.
48. Sachse S, Rappert A, Galizia CG. The spatial representation of chemical structures in the antennal lobe of honeybees: steps towards the olfactory code. Eur J Neurosci 1999, 11:3970-3982. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00826.x, 10583486.
49. Sandoz JC, Galizia CG, Menzel R. Side-specific olfactory conditioning leads to more specific odor representation between sides but not within sides in the honeybee antennal lobes. Neurosci 2003, 120:1137-1148.
50. Deisig N, Giurfa M, Lachnit H, Sandoz JC. Neural representation of olfactory mixtures in the honeybee antennal lobe. Eur J Neurosci 2006, 24:1161-1174. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04959.x, 16930442.
51. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967, 27:209-220.
52. Galan RF, Weidert M, Menzel R, Herz AV, Galizia CG. Sensory memory for odors is encoded in spontaneous correlated activity between olfactory glomeruli. Neural Comput 2006, 18:10-25. 10.1162/089976606774841558, 16354378.
53. Sachse S, Galizia CG. The coding of odour-intensity in the honeybee antennal lobe: local computation optimizes odour representation. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 18:2119-2132. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02931.x, 14622173.
54. Szyszka P, Ditzen M, Galkin A, Galizia CG, Menzel R. Sparsening and temporal sharpening of olfactory representations in the honeybee mushroom bodies. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94:3303-3313. 10.1152/jn.00397.2005, 16014792.
55. Silbering AF, Galizia CG. Processing of odor mixtures in the Drosophila antennal lobe reveals both global inhibition and glomerulus-specific interactions. J Neurosci 2007, 27:11966-11977. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-07.2007, 17978037.
56. Silbering AF, Okada R, Ito K, Galizia CG. Olfactory information processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe: anything goes?. J Neurosci 2008, 28:13075-13087. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2973-08.2008, 19052198.
57. Carlsson MA, Knusel P, Verschure PFMJ, Hansson BS. Spatio-temporal Ca2+ dynamics of moth olfactory projection neurones. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22:647-657. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04239.x, 16101746.
58. Galizia CG, Kimmerle B. Physiological and morphological characterization of honeybee olfactory neurons combining electrophysiology, calcium imaging and confocal microscopy. J Comp Physiol A 2004, 190:21-38.
59. Peele P, Ditzen M, Menzel R, Galizia CG. Appetitive odor learning does not change olfactory coding in a subpopulation of honeybee antennal lobe neurons. J Comp Physiol A 2006, 192:1083-1103.
60. Abel R, Rybak J, Menzel R. Structure and Response Patterns of Olfactory Interneurons in the Honeybee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol 2001, 437:363-383. 10.1002/cne.1289, 11494262.
61. Kirschner S, Kleineidam CJ, Zube C, Rybak J, Grunewald B, Rossler W. Dual olfactory pathway in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol 2006, 499:933-952. 10.1002/cne.21158, 17072827.
62. Müller D, Abel R, Brandt R, Zockler M, Menzel R. Differential parallel processing of olfactory information in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. J Comp Physiol A 2002, 188:359-370.
63. Gu X. Early metazoan divergence was about 830 million years ago. J Mol Evol 1998, 47:369-371. 10.1007/PL00013150, 9732464.
64. Peterson KJ, Lyons JB, Nowak KS, Takacs CM, Wargo MJ, McPeek MA. Estimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:6536-6541. 10.1073/pnas.0401670101, 404080, 15084738.
65. Grimaldi D, Engel SE. Evolution of the insects 2005, New-York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Benton R. On the ORigin of smell: odorant receptors in insects. Cell Mol Life Sci 2006, 63:1579-1585. 10.1007/s00018-006-6130-7, 16786219.
67. Robertson HM, Wanner KW. The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family. Genome Res 2006, 16:1395-1403. 10.1101/gr.5057506, 1626641, 17065611.
68. Hill CA, Fox AN, Pitts RJ, Kent LB, Tan PL, Chrystal MA, Cravchik A, Collins FH, Robertson HM, Zwiebel LJ. G protein-coupled receptors in Anopheles gambiae. Science 2002, 298:176-178. 10.1126/science.1076196, 12364795.
69. Stopfer M, Laurent G. Short-term memory in olfactory network dynamics. Nature 1999, 402:664-668. 10.1038/45244, 10604472.