Initial preference for drinking goal in the treatment of Alcohol problems: II. Treatment outcomes

Alcohol and Alcoholism

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 136-142

  Adamson, Simon J ^a   Heather, Nick ^b   Morton, Veronica ^c   Raistrick, Duncan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d Leeds Addiction Unit   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLISM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GOALS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); TEMPERANCE;

EID: 77949379548     PISSN: 07350414     EISSN: 14643502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agq005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adamson SJ, Sellman JD. (2001) Drinking goal selection and treatment outcome in out-patients with mild-moderate alcohol dependence. Drug Alc Review 20:351-9
2. Adamson S, Sellman J, Frampton C. (2009) Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: a systematic review. J Subs Abuse Treat 36:75-86.
3. Booth P, Dale B, Ansari J. (1984) Problem drinkers' goal preference and treatment outcome: a preliminary study. Addict Behav 9:357-64.
4. Booth PG, Dale B, Slade PD et al. (1992) A follow-up study of problem drinkers offered a goal preference option. J Stud Alcohol 53:594-600.
5. Coldwell B, Heather N. (2006) Introduction to the special issue. Addict Res Theory 14:1-5.
6. Copello A, Orford J, Hodgson R et al. (2009) Social Behaviour and Network Therapy for Alcohol Problems. London: Routledge.
7. Copello A, Orford J, Hodgson R et al., on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2002) Social behaviour and network therapy: basic principles and early experiences. Addict Behav 27:345-66.
8. Drummond DC. (1990) The relationship between alcohol dependence and alcohol related problems in a clinical population. Brit J Addict 85:357-66.
9. Duckert F. (1993) Predictive factors for outcome of treatment for alcohol problems. J Subs Abuse 5:31-44.
10. Duckert F, Amundsen A, Johnsen J. (1992) What happens to drinking after therapeutic intervention? Br J Addict 87:1457-67.
11. Elal-Lawrence G, Slade P, Dewey M. (1986) Predictors of outcome type in treated problem drinkers. J Stud Alcohol 47:41-7.
12. Elal-Lawrence G, Slade P, Dewey M. (1987) Treatment and followup variables discriminating abstainers, controlled drinkers and relapsers. J Stud Alcohol 48:39-46.
13. Foy D, Rychtarik R, O'Brien Tet al. (1979) Goal choice of alcoholics: effects of training controlled drinking skills. Behav Psychotherapy 7:101-10.
14. Heather N, Robertson I. (1981) Controlled Drinking. London: Methuen.
15. Heather N, Tebbutt J. (1989) Definitions of nonabstinent and abstinent categories in alcoholism treatment outcome classifications. Drug Alc Depend 24:83-93.
16. Heather N, Adamson S, Raistrick D et al., on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2010) Initial preference for drinking goal in the treatment of alcohol problems: I. Baseline difference between abstinence and non-abstinence groups 45:128-35.
17. Hodgins DC, Leigh G, Milne R et al. (1997) Drinking goal selection in behavioral self-management treatment of.chronic alcoholics. Addict Behav 22:247-55
18. Humphreys K, Tucker JA. (2002) Toward more responsive and effective intervention systems for alcohol-related problems (Editorial). Addiction 97:126-32.
19. Long CG, Williams M, Hollin CR. (1998) Alcoholism treatment: intake variables as outcome predictors. Addiction Res 6:295-305
20. Monahan S, Finney J. (1996) Explaining abstinence rates following treatment for alcohol abuse: a quantitative synthesis of patient, research design and treatment effects. Addiction 91:787-805.
21. Miller WR. (1996) Form 90: A Structured Assessment Interview for Drinking and Related Behaviors. (Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 5.). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
22. Miller WR, Leckman L, Delaney H et al. (1992a) Long-term follow-up op behavioral self-control training. J Stud Alcohol 53:249-61
23. Miller WR, Zweben A, DiClemente C et al. (1992b) Motivational Enhancement Therapy: A Clinical Research Guide for Therapists Treating Individuals with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence. Project MATCH Monograph Series, vol. 2, DHHS Pub. No. (ADM) 92-1894. Washington DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
24. Ojehagen A, Berglund M. (1989) Change of drinking goals in a two-year out-patient alcoholic treatment program. Addict Behav 14:1-9.
25. Project MATCH Research Group. (1997) Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 58:7-29.
26. Raistrick D, Bradshaw J, Tober G et al. (1994) Development of the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ): a questionnaire to measure alcohol and opiate dependence in the context of a treatment evaluation package. Addiction 89:563-72.
27. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. (2006) Obstacles to the adoption of low risk drinking goals in the treatment of alcohol problems in the United States: a commentary. Addict Res Theory 14:19-24.
28. Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Gavin DR. (1995) Portraying alcohol treatment outcomes: different yardsticks of success. Behav Ther 26:643-69.
29. UKATT Research Team. (2001) United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial: hypotheses, design and methods. Alcohol Alcohol 36:11-21.
30. UKATT Research Team. (2005) Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). Br Med J 351:541-4.