QoS-driven runtime adaptation of service oriented architectures

ESEC-FSE'09 - Proceedings of the Joint 12th European Software Engineering Conference and 17th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 131-140

  Cardellini, Valeria ^a   Casalicchio, Emiliano ^a   Grassi, Vincenzo ^a   Lo Presti, Francesco ^a   Mirandola, Raffaela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Quality of service; Runtime adaptation; Service oriented architecture

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION MECHANISM; BEHAVIORAL MODEL; LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM; MONITORING ACTIVITIES; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; OPERATING ENVIRONMENT; PROTOTYPE TOOLS; QOS REQUIREMENTS; RUNTIME ADAPTATION; RUNTIMES; SERVICE ORIENTED SYSTEMS; UNIFIED FRAMEWORK;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; LINEARIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

EID: 77949375863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1595696.1595718     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. D. Ardagna, C. Ghezzi, and R. Mirandola. Model driven qos analyses of composed web services. In ServiceWave, volume 5377 of LNCS, pages 299-311, 2008.
2. D. Ardagna and B. Pernici. Adaptive service composition in flexible processes. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 33(6):369-384, June 2007.
3. R. Berbner, M. Spahn, N. Repp, O. Heckmann, and R. Steinmetz. Heuristics for qos-aware web service composition. In IEEE Services Computing Workshops, pages 72-82, 2006.
4. E. Borger. Modeling workflow patterns from first principles. In ER 2007, volume 4801 of LNCS, pages 1-20, 2007.
5. G. Canfora, M. D. Penta, R. Esposito, and M. L. Villani. A framework for qos-aware binding and re-binding of composite web services. J. of Systems and Software, 81(10):1754-1769, 2008.
6. V. Cardellini, E. Casalicchio, V. Grassi, and R. Mirandola. A framework for optimal service selection in broker-based architectures with multiple QoS classes. In IEEE Services Computing Workshops, pages 105-112, 2006.
7. V. Cardellini, E. Casalicchio, V. Grassi, and F. L. Presti. Flow-based service selection for web service composition supporting multiple qos classes. In IEEE ICWS, pages 743-750, 2007.
8. J. Cardoso, A. P. Sheth, J. A. Miller, J. Arnold, and K. J. Kochut. Modeling quality of service for workflows and web service processes. Web Semantics J., 1(3):281-308, 2004.
9. G. Chafle, P. Doshi, J. Harney, S. Mittal, and B. Srivastava. Improved adaptation of web service compositions using value of changed information. In IEEE ICWS, pages 784-791, 2007.
10. B. H. C. Cheng, H. Giese, P. Inverardi, J. Magee, and R. de Lemos. 08031 - software engineering for self-adaptive systems: A research road map. In Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems, volume 08031 of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, 2008.
11. H. R. D.A. Menascé and H. Gomma. Qos management in service oriented architectures. Performance Evaluation J., 7-8(64), Aug. 2007.
12. O. Ezenwoye and S. M. Sadjadi. A language-based approach to addressing reliability in composite web services. In SEKE, pages 649-654, 2008.
13. H. Guo, J. Huai, H. Li, T. Deng, Y. Li, and Z. Du. Angel: Optimal configuration for high available service composition. In IEEE ICWS, pages 280-287, 2007.
14. J. Harney and P. Doshi. Speeding up adaptation of web service compositions using expiration times. In WWW, pages 1023-1032. ACM, 2007.
15. Q. He, J. Yan, H. Jin, and Y. Yang. Adaptation of web service composition based on workflow patterns. In ICSOC, pages 22-37. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
16. M. C. Huebscher and J. A. McCann. A survey of autonomic computing - degrees, models, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv., 40(3), 2008.
17. J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess. The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer, 36(1):41-50, 2003.
18. Keynote system. http://www.keynote.com.
19. M. Marzolla and R. Mirandola. Performance prediction of web service workflows. In QoSA, volume 4880 of LNCS, pages 127-144. Springer, 2007.
20. E. M. Maximilien and M. P. Singh. Toward autonomic web services trust and selection. In ICSOC, pages 212-221, 2004.
21. D. Menascé. QoS issues in Web Services. IEEE Internet Comp., 6(6):72-75, 2002.
22. OASIS. Web Services Business Process Execution Language version 2.0, Jan. 2007. http://www.oasis-open.org.
23. Y. Qu, C. Lin, Y. Wang, and Z. Shan. Qos-aware composite service selection in grids. In Int'l Conf. Grid and Cooperative Computing, pages 458-465, 2006.
24. D. Rud, A. Schmietendorf, and R. Dumke. Performance modeling of ws-bpel-based web service compositions. In IEEE Services Computing Workshops, pages 140-147, 2006.
25. K. Verma, P. Doshi, K. Gomadam, J. A. Miller, and A. P. Sheth. Optimal adaptation in web processes with coordination constraints. In IEEE ICWS, 2006.
26. T. Yu, Y. Zhang, and K.-J. Lin. Efficient algorithms for web services selection with end-to-end qos constraints. ACM Trans. Web, 1(1):1-26, 2007.
27. L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnamam, and H. Chang. QoS-aware middleware for web services composition. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 30(5), May 2004.