Seismic response of high-rise RC buildings made of high-strength materials

American Concrete Institute, ACI Special Publication

Volumn SP-228, Issue , 2005, Pages 595-614

  Konstantinidis, Dimitrios ^a,b,c  

^a Egnatia Odos

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Buildings; High strength concrete; Pushover analysis; Seismic design

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CONCRETE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; COLLAPSE PREVENTION; DESIGN EARTHQUAKES; FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH; HIGH PERFORMANCE MATERIAL; HIGH-STRENGTH MATERIALS; PARAMETRIC -ANALYSIS; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 77949369087     PISSN: 01932527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. CEN Technical Committee. 250/SC8, 2002, “Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (prEN 1998-1, Revised Final Draft No 5),” CEN, Brussels.
2. CEN Technical Committee. 250/SC2, 2002, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures-Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (prEN 1992-1, revised final draft),” CEN, Brussels.
3. Armendariz, P., 1995, Behavior of high strength concrete structures under seismic loads, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
4. ICBO, 1991, “Uniform Building Code - 1991, 1994 and 1997 Editions,” Vol. 2: Structural Engineering Design Provisions, Whittier, California, USA.
5. Penelis, G. G. and Kappos, A. J., 1997, Earthquake resistant concrete structures, E & FN SPON (Chapman & Hall), London.
6. Statik 3/Fagus 3, version 1.9, 1997, “User's Manual for the Analysis of plane and special frameworks,” Cubus AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
7. CEN Technical Committee. 250/SC8, 1995, “Eurocode 8: Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (ENV 1998-1-1/2/3),” CEN, Berlin.
8. FEMA, 2000, “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” FEMA Report No. 356, Washington D.C., USA.
9. Izzuddin, B. A., 1991, Non-linear dynamic analysis of framed structures, PhD thesis, Imperial College, London, UK.
10. Izzuddin, B. A. Karayannis, C. G. and Elnashai, A. S., 1994, “Advanced nonlinear formulation for reinforced concrete beam-columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 10, pp. 2913-2934.
11. Kappos, A. J. and Konstantinidis, D., 1999, “Statistical analysis of confined High Strength Concrete,” Materials and Structures, 32, pp. 734-748.
12. Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H., 1998, “Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes,” Proceedings of Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, Booth (ed.), Rotterdam, Balkema, pp. 459-466.
13. SEAOC Seismology Committee, 1999, “Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary,” SEAOC, Sacramento, California, USA.
14. Kappos, A. J., 1991, “Analytical prediction of the collapse earthquake for R/C buildings: Suggested Methodology,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 167-176.
15. Paulay, T., 2001, “A re-definition of the stiffness of reinforced concrete elements and its implications in seismic design,” Structural Engineering International, Vol. 1, pp. 36-41.
16. Dymiotis, C. Kappos, A. J. and Chryssanthopoulos, M. K., 1999, “Seismic reliability of RC frames with uncertain drift and member capacity”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 125, No. 9, pp. 1038-1047.