Design and evaluation of gastroretentive mucoadhesive cephalexin tablets

Pharmaceutical Development and Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 178-183

  Sonani, N G ^a   Hiremath, S P ^a   Dasankoppa, F S ^a   Jamakandi, V G ^a   Sreenivas, S A ^a  

^a KLE College of Pharmacy   (India)

Author keywords

Cephalexin; Gastroretentive; In vitro residence time; In vivo retention study; Mucoadhesive tablets; Polymers

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; CARBOMER; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CEFALEXIN; CHITOSAN; HYDROXYPROPYLCELLULOSE; HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG RETENTION; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG STABILITY; NONHUMAN; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PKA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TABLET;

EID: 77949363801     PISSN: 10837450     EISSN: 10979867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10837450903085426     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bardonnet PL, Faivre V, Pugh WJ, Piffaretti JC, Falson F. Gastroretentive dosage forms: Overview and special case of helicobacter pylori. J Control Release 2006;111:1-18.
2. Bernkop-Schnurch A. Synthesis and characterization of mucoadhesive thiolated polymers. Int J Pharm 2000;194:239-247.
3. Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of bioadhesive strength of mucoadhesive buccal tablets: Design of an in-vitro assembly. Indian Drugs 1992;30(4):152-155.
4. El-kamel AH, Sokar MA, Nagger VF, Al Gamal SS. Bioadhesive controlled release metronidazole vaginal tablets. Acta Pharm 2002;52:171-179.
5. http://redpoll.pharmacy.ualberta.ca/drugbank/cgibin/getCard. cgi?CARD=APRD00250.txt
6. Saravanan M, Nataraj KS, Ganesh KS. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose based cephalexin extended release tablets: Influence of tablet formulation, hardness and storage on in vitro release kinetics. Chem Pharm Bull 2003;51(8):978-983.
7. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In: Lachman L, Liberman HA, Kanig JI, editors. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 3rd ed. Mumbai: Varghese Publishing House; 1987; 293-345.
8. El-Samaligy MS, Yahia SA, Basalious EB. Formulation and evaluation of diclofenac sodium buccoadhesive discs. Int J Pharm 2004;286:27-39.
9. Mortazavi SA. A comparative study between the strength and duration of mucosa-adhesion of transbuccal carbomer based aqueous gels. Iranian J Pharmaceut Res 2002;1:7-13.
10. Nafee NA, Ismail FA, Boraie NA, Mortadam LM.Mucoadhesive delivery systems. I. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers for buccal tablet formulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2004;30(9):985-993.
11. Rao YM, Vani G, Ramesha Chary RB. Design and evaluation of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Indian Drugs 1998;35(9):558-565.
12. Sharma P, Hamsa V. Formulation and evaluation of buccal mucoadhesive patches of terbutaline sulphate. STP Pharma Sci 2001;11(4):275-281.
13. Mohammadi-Samani S, Bahri-Najafi R, Yousefi G. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of prednisolone buccoadhesive tablets. IL Farmaco 2005;60:339-344.
14. Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Rubini D, Giovagnoli S, Ricci M, Blasi P, Rossi C. Novel mucoadhesive buccal formulation containing metronidazoe for the treatment of periodontal disease. J Control Release 2004;95:521-533.