Simulating time-to-contact when both target and observer are in motion

Displays

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 59-66

  Geri, George A ^a   Gray, Rob ^b   Grutzmacher, Richard ^c  

^a AFRL Visual Research Laboratory   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Optic flow; Relative motion; Time to contact

Indexed keywords

OPTIC FLOW; TARGET MOTIONS; TIME-TO-CONTACT; VISUAL CUES; WIDE-FIELD;

OPTICAL FLOWS;

TARGETS;

EID: 77949337847     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2009.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5 (1976) 437-459
2. Wann J.P. Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 1031-1048
3. Tresilian J.R. Visually timed action: time-out for 'tau'?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 301-310
4. Cavallo V., and Laurent M. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception 17 (1988) 623-632
5. Gray R., and Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular cues. Vision Research 38 (1998) 499-512
6. Gray R., and Regan D. Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to contact. Current Biology 10 (2000) 587-590
7. Hesketh B., and Godley S.T. A comparison of time estimations in driving with target-only in motion, self-only in motion, and self-and-target in motion. Ecological Psychology 14 (2002) 111-125
8. Gray R., Macuga K.M., and Regan D. Long range interactions between object motion and self-motion in the perception of movement in depth. Vision Research 44 (2004) 179-195
9. Probst T., Brandt T., and Degner D. Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: psychophysics of a new phenomenon. Behavioral Brain Research 22 (1986) 1-11
10. von Holst E., and Mittelstadt H. Das Reafferenzprincip. Naturwissenschaften 37 (1950) 464-476
11. E.R. Boer, Experiencing the same road twice: a driver comparison between simulation and reality, in: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference, Paris, France, 2000.
12. Dessing J.C., Peper C.E., and Beek P.J. A comparison of real catching with catching using stereoscopic visual displays. Ecological Psychology 16 (2004) 1-21
13. DeLucia P.R. Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 738-748
14. DeLucia P.R., and Warren R. Pictorial and motion-based information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 783-798
15. Caird J.K., and Hancock P.A. The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology 6 (1994) 83-109
16. Bootsma R., and Craig C.M. Global and local contributions to the optical specification of time to contact: observer sensitivity to composite tau. Perception 31 (2002) 901-924
17. Kruk R., and Regan D. Collision avoidance: a helicopter simulation study. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67 (1996) 111-114
18. Hoffmann E.R., and Mortimer R.G. Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention 28 (1996) 415-421
19. Schiff W., and Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival - effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 303-316
20. Hancock P.A., and Manser M.P. Time-to-contact: more than tau alone. Ecological Psychology 9 (1997) 265-297
21. Schiff W., and Detwiler M.L. Information used in judging impending collision. Perception 8 (1979) 647-658
22. McLeod R.W., and Ross H.E. Optic-flow and cognitive-factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception 12 (1983) 417-423
23. Redlick F.P., Jenkin M., and Harris L.R. Humans can use optical flow to estimate distance of travel. Vision Research 41 (2001) 213-219
24. Frenz H., and Lappe M. Absolute travel distance from optical flow. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1679-1692
25. Giachritsis C.D., and Harris M.G. Global versus local image expansion in estimating time-to-contact from complex optical flow. Perception 34 (2005) 577-585
26. van de Grind W.A., van der Smagt M.J., and Verstraten F.A.J. Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects. Vision Research 44 (2004) 2269-2284
27. Lappe M., Jenkin M., and Harris L.R. Travel distance estimation from visual motion by leaky path integration. Experimental Brain Research 180 (2007) 35-48
28. Bissell A.F. Lines through the origin - is no int the answer?. Journal of Applied Statistics 19 (1992) 193-210
29. Kaiser M.K., and Mowafy L. Optical specification of time-to-passage: observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 1028-1040
30. Oudejans R.R.D., Michaels C.F., and de Vries M.M. Testing tau: which tau is actually used?. In: Valenti S.S., and Pittenger J.B. (Eds). Studies in Perception and Action II (1993), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 353-357