|
Volumn 9, Issue , 2010, Pages 18-
|
Intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: user acceptability.
a a a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIMALARIAL AGENT;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
GHANA;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
MALARIA;
MASS SCREENING;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT ATTITUDE;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
STATISTICS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
ANIMALS;
ANTIMALARIALS;
CHEMOPREVENTION;
FEMALE;
FOCUS GROUPS;
GHANA;
HUMANS;
MALARIA;
MASS SCREENING;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, INFECTIOUS;
YOUNG ADULT;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 77949318930
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14752875
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-18 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (44)
|
References (0)
|