The determination of content

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 253-272

  Szabó, Zoltán ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compositionality; Content; Context; Meaning; Speech act

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949278341     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-008-9296-z     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bach, K. (1994). Semantic slack: What is said and more. In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech-act theory (pp. 267-291). London: Routledge.
2. Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. (2005). Insensitive semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Donnellan, K. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, 281-304.
6. Fine, K. (2007). Semantic relationism. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Fodor, J. (2001). Language, thought and compositionality. Mind and Language, 16, 1-15.
8. Fodor, J., & Lepore, E. (1991). 'Why meaning probably isn't conceptual role.' Reprinted in The compositionality papers (pp. 9-26). Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
9. Higginbotham, J. (1988). Contexts, models and meanings: A note on the data of semantics. In R. Kempson (Ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality (pp. 29-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Horwich, P. (1998). Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Janssen, T. M. V. (1983). Foundations and applications of montague grammar. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
12. Janssen, T. M. V. (2001). Frege, contextuality and compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10, 115-136.
13. Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives. An essay on the logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. Reprinted in J. Perry & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481-565). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
14. King, J., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Z. G. Szabó (Ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics (pp. 111-164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, 255-276.
16. Lahav, R. (1989). Against compositionality: The case of adjectives. Philosophical Studies, 57, 261-279.
17. Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Lewis, D. (1970). 'General semantics'. Reprinted in philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 189-229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. MacFarlane, J. (2008). Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese. doi: 10. 1007/s11229-007-9286-2.
20. Pelletier, F. J. (1994). The principle of semantic compositionality. Topoi, 13, 11-24.
21. Pelletier, F. J. (2001). Did Frege believe in Frege's principle? Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10, 87-114.
22. Pelletier, F. J. (2003). Context-dependence and compositionality. Mind and Language, 18, 148-161.
23. Perry, J. (1986). 'Thought without representation.' In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Suppl. Vol. 60, pp. 263-283). London: Aristotelian Society Publications.
24. Recanati, F. (1989). 'The pragmatics of what is said.' Mind and Language4: 295-329.
25. Searle, J. R. (1968). Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. Philosophical Review, 77, 405-424.
26. Searle, J. R. (1978). Literal meaning. Erkenntnis, 13, 207-224.
27. Soames, S. (2005). Naming and asserting. In Z. G. Szabó (Ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics (pp. 356-382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Stainton, R. (2006). Words and thoughts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 701-721.
31. Stanley, J. (2000). Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 391-434.
32. Stanley, J., & Szabó, Z. G. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language, 15, 219-261.
33. Szabó, Z. G. (2000a). Compositionality as supervenience. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 475-505.
34. Szabó, Z. G. (2000b). Adjectives in context. In I. Kenesei & R. Harnish (Eds.), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse (pp. 119-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Szabó, Z. G. (2000c). Problems of compositionality. New York: Garland.
36. Szabó, Z. G. (2007). Compositionality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/compositionality/.
37. Travis, C. (1985). On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 15, 187-229.
38. Travis, C. (1994). 'On constraints of generality.' In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series 44, pp. 165-188). London: Aristotelian Society Publications.
39. Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Zadrozny, W. (1994). From compositional to systematic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, 329-342.