When scary messages backfire: Influence of dispositional cognitive avoidance on the effectiveness of threat communications

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 137-141

  Nestler, Steffen ^a   Egloff, Boris ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive avoidance; Coping; Efficacy; Severity; Threat communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949274497     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dabbs J.M., Leventhal H. Effects of varying the recommendations in a fear-arousing communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966, 4:525-531.
2. Dillard J.P. Rethinking the study of fear appeals: An emotional perspective. Communication Theory 1994, 4:295-323.
3. Egloff B., Hock M. A comparison of two approaches to the assessment of coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences 1997, 23:913-916.
4. Egloff B., Krohne H.W. Die Messung von Vigilanz und kognitiver Vermeidung: Untersuchungen mit dem Angstbewältigungs-Inventar. Diagnostica 1998, 44:189-200.
5. Hock M., Krohne H.W. Coping with threat and memory for ambigous information: Testing the repressive discontinuity hypothesis. Emotion 2004, 4:65-86.
6. Hovland C.I., Janis I.L., Kelley H.H. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change 1953, Yale University Press, New Haven.
7. Krohne H.W. Individual differences in emotional reactions and coping. Handbook of affective sciences 2003, 698-725. Oxford University Press, New York. R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer, H.H. Goldsmith (Eds.).
8. Krohne H.W., Egloff B., Varner L.J., Burns L.R., Weidner G., Ellis H.C. The assessment of dispositional vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Factorial structure, psychometric properties, and validity of the Mainz Coping Inventory (MCI). Cognitive Therapy and Research 2000, 24:297-311.
9. Krohne H.W., Hock M. Cognitive avoidance, positive affect and gender as the predictors of the processing of aversive information. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42:1572-1584.
10. Leventhal H. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Advances in experimental social psychology 1970, Vol. 5:119-186. Academic Press, San Diego.
11. Liberman A., Chaiken S. Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1992, 18:669-679.
12. Miller S.M. Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:345-353.
13. Mowen J.C., Harris E.G., Bone S.A. Personality traits and fear response to print advertisements: Theory and an empirical study. Psychology and Health 2004, 21:927-943.
14. Myers L., Davies A., Evans E., Stygall J. How successful are repressors at self-care behavior?. Psychology and Health 2005, 20(Suppl):188-999.
15. Rogers R.W. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social psychophysiology 1983, 153-176. Guilford Press, New York. J.T. Cacioppo, R.E. Petty (Eds.).
16. Ruiter R.A.C., Abraham C., Kok G. Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health 2001, 16:613-630.
17. Ruiter R.A.C., Verplanken B., Cremer D., Kok G. Danger and fear control in fear appeals: The role of need for cognition. Basic and Applied Psychology 2004, 26:13-24.
18. Weinberger D.A. The construct validity of the repressive coping style. Repression und dissociation 1990, 337-386. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. J.L. Singer (Ed.).
19. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs 1992, 59:329-349.
20. Witte K. Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs 1994, 61:113-134.
21. Witte K., Morrison K. Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression-sensitization on individuals' reactions to fear appeals. Western Journal of Communication 2000, 64:1-27.