The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption-A survey of the experimental evidence

Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1598-1608

  Faruqui, Ahmad ^a   Sergici, Sanem ^a   Sharif, Ahmed ^a  

^a THE BRATTLE GROUP   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy conservation; Energy efficiency; Feedback; In home displays; Information

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; SALES;

CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR; DEMAND RESPONSE; EFFICIENT USE OF ENERGY; ELECTRIC BILLS; ELECTRICITY PRE-PAYMENT SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY-CONSUMPTION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND COST; EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE; INFORMATIONAL FEEDBACK; PILOT PROGRAMS; PILOT STUDIES; REAL-TIME INFORMATION; USE RATE;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY USE; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRICE DYNAMICS; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 77949268273     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.042     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Darby S. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. Oxford, United Kingdom (April, 2006). http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/climatechange/uk/energy/research/pdf/energyconsump-feedback.pdf
2. Darby S. Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. Oxford, United Kingdom (2000). http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/climatechange/uk/energy/research/pdf/energyconsump-feedback.pdf
3. Fischer C. Chapter 31: consumer feedback: a helpful tool for stimulating electricity conservation?. Proceedings: SCP cases in the field of food, mobility, and housing; workshop of the sustainable consumption research exchange (SCORE!) network (June 4-5, 2007) SCORE! Network Paris, France
4. Faruqui A., and Sanem S. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity - a survey of the experimental evidence. Cambridge, Massachusetts and San Francisco, California (January 10, 2009). http://www.hks.harvard.edu/hepg
5. Hydro One Networks. The impact of real-time feedback on residential electricity consumption: the hydro one pilot. Toronto, Ontario (March, 2006). http://www.hydroonenetworks.com/en/regulatory/2008_distribution_rate_application/Dx_Rate_Filing/Exhibit_H_Interrogatory_Responses/Tab_3_Green_Energy_Coalition.pdf
6. CEATI International, Inc. Results of two-year study demonstrates residential electricity monitors help homeowners conserve electricity in a big way. Clearwater, Florida and St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador (January 30, 2008). http://www.bluelineinnovations.com/documents/pr-ceati.pdf
7. Opinion Dynamics, Corporation. Interim report for: power cost monitoring pilot program evaluation; February 13, 2008.
8. Deremer K. Advice letter 1938-E, revisions to demand response programs (October 31, 2007). http://www.sdge.com/tm2/pdf/1938-E.pdf
9. Green, A. Potential of in-home displays in the PG&E service territory. Pacific gas and electric company; January 28, 2008.
10. Matsukawa I. The effects of information on residential demand for electricity. The Energy Journal 25 1 (2004) 1-17
11. Quesnelle K. Pay-as-you-go-power, treating electricity as a commodity. Woodstock, Ontario (January 20, 2004). http://www.regie-energie.qc.ca/audiences/3519-03/PreuveINTERV3519/GRAME-1-Doc3-DocInformation_21janv04.pdf
12. Pruitt B. SRP M-Power... a better way to keep customers in power & save energy, too (2005). http://www.swenergy.org/workshops/2005/PRESENTATION%20-%20Pruitt%20SRP%20 M-Power.pdf
13. King J. M-Power: a better way to keep customers in power. Energy Central, Energy Pulse (January 19, 2007). http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1406
14. Metering.com. SRP wins NERO energy-efficiency award. Washington, DC and Phoenix, Arizona (July 2, 2008). http://www.metering.com/node/12902
15. Hydro One Networks. Hydro One Networks Inc. Time-of-use pricing pilot project results. Toronto, Ontario (May, 2008). http://www.oeb.gov.on.ca/documents/cases/EB-2004-0205/smartpricepilot/TOU_Pilot_Report_HydroOne_20080513.pdf
16. Primen, Inc. Final report, information display pilot, California statewide pricing pilot (January 5, 2005). http://www.energetics.com/madri/toolbox/pdfs/pricing/nexus_2005_ca_info_display_pilot.pdf
17. Country Energy of Australia. The country energy home energy efficiency trial. New South Wales, Australia (2006). http://www.sustainability.vic.gov.au/resources/documents/C2_Ben_Hamilton.pdf
18. Primen, Inc. California information display pilot technology assessment. Boulder, Colorado (December 21, 2004). http://ciee.ucop.edu/dretd/documents/idp_tech_assess_final1221.pdf
19. Buck J. Prepaid service benefits a co-op and its customers. Utility-Automation (May, 2008) 40-45. http://www.exceleron.com/news/news_oec_case_study.pdf
20. Jones H., and Severs J. Prepaid programs get smart. Energy Central (September 19, 2008). http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1827
21. Landis + Gyr. Landis + Gyr News Plus, December 08 Newsletter (December, 2008). http://www.terrapinn.com/2009/wapow/data/landis+gyr_4_dec_news.pdf
22. Louisville Gas and Electric Company. Application of Louisville Gas and Electric company for an order approving a responsive pricing and smart metering pilot program (March 21, 2007). http://psc.ky.gov/order_vault/Orders_2008/200700117_10072008.pdf
23. Public Service Commission of Kentucky. Order in regard to application of Louisville gas and electric company for an order approving a responsive pricing and smart metering pilot program (March 21, 2007). http://psc.ky.gov/order_vault/Orders_2008/200700117_10072008.pdf