How different are ICT-supported pedagogical practices from extensive and non-extensive ICT-using science teachers?

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 325-343

  Voogt, Joke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

International comparative research; Science education; Science teacher; Secondary education; Student outcomes; Teaching practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949264943     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-009-9092-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
2. Becker, H. J., Rawitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. T. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Irvine, CA: University of California.
3. Carstens, R., & Pelgrum, W. J. (2009). Second information technology in education study. SITES 2006 technical report. Amsterdam: IEA.
4. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.).(2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. European Commission. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
7. Kozma, R. B. (ed). (2003). Technology, innovation and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
8. Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008). In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world. Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp 121-179). CERC Studies in comparative education. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world. Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. CERC Studies in comparative education. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer.
10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Lifelong learning. Observer, February, 1-8. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/17/11/29478789. pdf.
11. Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. A. (eds). (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for lifelong learning: A worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
12. Voogt, J. (1999). Most satisfying experiences with ICT. In W. J. Pelgrum & R. E. Anderson (Eds.), ICT and the emerging paradigm for life long learning: A worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices (pp. 199-216). Amsterdam: IEA.
13. Voogt, J. (2003). Consequences of ICT for aims, contents, processes and environments of learning. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 217-236). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Voogt, J. (2008). Satisfying Pedagogical Practices Using ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp. Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world. Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp 221-250). CERC Studies in comparative education. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer.
15. Voogt, J., & Pelgrum, W. J. (2005). ICT and curriculum change. Human technology: an Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 1(2), 157-175.