The application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods in the selection of a project manager

ICCIT 2009 - 4th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1387-1391

  Zhao, Liqin ^a   Guo, Yuexian ^a   Cui, Wenming ^a  

^a SHIJIAZHUANG TIEDAO UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Construction enterprises; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Project manager

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION MODEL; CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION METHOD; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; NEW APPROACHES; PROJECT MANAGERS; PROMOTING ROLE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGERS;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77749327535     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCIT.2009.233     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Kall P. Stochastic programming: achievements and open problems. In: Models,Methods and Decision Support for Management: Essays in Honor of Paul Stahly,Heidelberg. New York: Physica-Verlag, 2001,285-302;
2. Li Qun. Study of Mathematical Methods of Uncertainty and Its Application in Social Science Research [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2005,(2):27-35;
3. Ahmed S, Sahinidis N V. An approximation scheme for stochastic integerprograms arising in capacity expansion. Operations Research, 2003, 51,(3): 461-471 ;
4. Pantelides C P. Comparison of fuzzy set and convex model theories in structuraldesign. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2001,15(3):499-511;
5. Qiu Z P. Comparison of static response of structures using convex models andinterval analysis method. International Journal for Numerical Methods inEngineering, 2003,56:1735-1753;
6. Averbakh I, Lebedev V. On the complexity of minimax regret linearprogramming. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005,160(1):227-231.