Optimal replacement policies for dairy cows based on daily yield measurements

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 75-92

  Nielsen, L R ^a   Jorgensen E ^a   Kristensen, A R ^b   Ostergaard S ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Herd management; Hierarchical Markov decision process; State space model; Stochastic dynamic programming

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; LACTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; LACTATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 77749323395     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2209     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bar D., Tauer L.W., Bennett G., Gonzalez R.N., Hertl J.A., Schukken Y.H., Schulte H.F., Welcome F.L., Grohn Y.T. The cost of generic clinical mastitis in dairy cows as estimated by using dynamic programming. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:2205-2214.
2. Bar D., Tauer L.W., Bennett G., Gonzalez R.N., Hertl J.A., Schukken Y.H., Schulte H.F., Welcome F.L., Grohn Y.T. Use of a dynamic programming model to estimate the value of clinical mastitis treatment and prevention options utilized by dairy producers. Agric. Syst. 2009, 99:6-12.
3. Bascom S.S., Young A.J. A summary of the reasons why farmers cull cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:2299-2305.
4. Beaudeau F., Ducrocq V., Fourichon C., Seegers H. Effect of disease on length of productive life of French Holstein dairy cows assessed by survival analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78:103-117.
5. Dechow C.D., Goodling R. Mortality, culling by sixty days in milk, and production profiles in high-and low-survival Pennsylvania herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4630-4639.
6. Delorenzo M.A., Spreen T.H., Bryan G.R., Beede D.K., van Arendonk J.A.M. Optimizing model: Insemination, replacement, seasonal production, and cash flow. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:885-896.
7. Friggens N.C., Chagunda M.G.G., Bjerring M., Ridder C., Højsgaard S., Larsen T. Estimating degree of mastitis from time-series measurements in milk: A test of a model based on lactate dehydrogenase measurements. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:5415-5427.
8. Friggens N.C., Ingvartsen K.L., Emmans G.C. Prediction of body lipid change in pregnancy and lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:988-1000.
9. Giaever, H. 1966. Optimal dairy cow replacement policies. PhD thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
10. Groenendaal H., Galligan D.T., Mulder H.A. An economic spreadsheet model to determine optimal breeding and replacement decisions for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:2146-2157.
11. Hastie T Generalized Additive Models 1993, Chapman & Hall, Inc., New York, NY.
12. Heikkila A.M., Nousiainen J.I., Jauhiainen L. Optimal replacement policy and economic value of dairy cows with diverse health status and production capacity. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:2342-2352.
13. Houben E.H., Huirne R., Dijkhuizen A., Kristensen A. Optimal replacement of mastitis cows determined by a hierarchic Markov process. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77:2975-2993.
14. Jenkins K.B., Halter A.N. A multistage stochastic replacement decision model: Application to replacement of dairy cows. Technical bulletin: Agric. Exp. Sta 1963, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Page 67.
15. Jørgensen E. Technical report (internal): A semi-Markov chain model for the reproduction cycle 2009, Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
16. Kennedy J.O.S., Stott A.W. An adaptive decision-making aid for dairy cow replacement. Agric. Syst. 1993, 42:25-39.
17. Korver S., van Arendonk J.A.M. Modelling of Livestock Production Systems 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
18. Kristensen A. Optimal replacement and ranking of dairy cows determined by a hierarchical Markov process. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987, 16:131-144.
19. Kristensen A. Optimal replacement and ranking of dairy cows under milk quotas. Acta Agric. Scand. 1989, 39:311-318.
20. Kristensen A. A general software system for Markov decision processes in herd management applications. Comp. Electric. Agric. 2003, 38:199-215.
21. Kristensen A.R., Jørgensen E. Multi-level hierarchic Markov processes as a framework for herd management support. Ann. Oper. Res. 2000, 94:69-89.
22. Kristensen E., Østergaard S., Krogh M.A., Enevoldsen C. Technical indicators of financial performance in the dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:620-631.
23. Monti G., Tenhagen B.A., Heuwieser W. Culling policies in dairy herds. A review. Zentralbl. Veterinarmed. A 1999, 46:1-11.
24. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle 2000, National Research Council, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, Page 232.
25. Nebel R.L. On-farm milk progesterone tests. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71:1682-1690.
26. Nielsen L. Technical report: Embedding a state space model into a Markov decision process 2008, Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
27. Norberg E., Hogeveen H., Korsgaard I., Friggens N., Sloth K., Lovendahl P. Electrical conductivity of milk: Ability to predict mastitis status. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:1099-1107.
28. Østergaard S., Chagunda M., Friggens N., Bennedsgaard T.W., Klaas I.C. A stochastic model simulating pathogen-specific mastitis control in a dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:4243-4257.
29. Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, and S. Sarkar. 2006. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-78. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html.
30. Rajala-Schultz P.J., Grohn Y., Allore H. Optimizing breeding decisions for Finnish dairy herds. Acta Vet. Scand. 2000, 41:199-212.
31. Sargent R.G. Verification and validation of simulation models. Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation 2008, 157-169.
32. Sørensen J.T. Validation of livestock herd simulation models: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1990, 26:79-90.
33. Stott A. The economic advantage of longevity in the dairy cow. J. Agric. Econ. 1994, 45:113-122.
34. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Development Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
35. van Arendonk J.A.M. Studies on the replacement policies in dairy cattle. IV. Influence of seasonal variation in performance and prices. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1986, 14:15-28.
36. Vargas B., Herrero M., van Arendonk J. Interactions between optimal replacement policies and feeding strategies in dairy herds. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 69:17-31.
37. Verstegen J.A.A.M., Huirne R.B.M., Dijkhuizen A.A., Kleijnen J.P.C. Economic value of management information systems in agriculture: A review of evaluation approaches. Comp. and Electric. in Agric. 1995, 13:273-288.
38. Vestergaard M., Madsen N.T., Bligaard H.B., Bredahl L., Rasmussen P.T., Andersen H.R. Consequences of two or four months of finishing feeding of culled dry dairy cows on carcass characteristics and technological and sensory meat quality. Meat Sci. 2007, 13:635-643.
39. West M., Harrison J. Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models 1997, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
40. Wilmink J.B.M. Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987, 16:335-348.
41. Wood P.D.P. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 1967, 216:164-165.
42. Yalcin C., Stott A. Dynamic programming to investigate financial impacts of mastitis control decisions in milk production systems. J. Dairy Res. 2000, 67:515-528.