Protandry, mating systems, and sex expression in the federally endangered Ptilimnium nodosum (apiaceae)1

Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 178-188

  Marcinko, Sarah E ^a   Randall, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Andromonoecy; Apiaceae; Asexual reproduction; Conservation; Endangered species; Mating systems; North Carolina; Protandry

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; DICOTYLEDON; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GERMINATION; HERB; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; VEGETATIVE REPRODUCTION;

NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

APIACEAE; APIALES; HEXAPODA; PTILIMNIUM NODOSUM;

EID: 77749317547     PISSN: 10955674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3159/07-RA-008.1     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. AIZEN, M. A. 1997. Influence of local floral density and sex ratio on pollen receipt and seed output: empirical and experimental results in dichogamous Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae). Oecologia 111: 404-412.
2. AIZEN, M. A. 2001. Flower sex ratio, pollinator abundance, and the seasonal pollination dynamics of a protandrous plant. Ecology 82: 127-144.
3. BARRETT, S. H. 1998. The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3: 335-341.
4. BARRETT, S. H. AND J. R. KOHN. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants, pp. 3-30. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
5. BELDEN, A. 2003. Welcome to Virginia, Harperella. The Bulletin: A publication of the Virginia Native Plant Society 22: 1.
6. BELL, C. R. 1971. Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers. The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64(Suppl. 1): 93-106.
7. BOERSMA, P. D., P. KAREIVA, W. F. FAGAIN, J. A. CLARK, AND J. M. HOEKSTRA. 2001. How good are endangered species recovery plans? BioScience 51: 643-649.
8. BRUNET, J. AND D. CHARLESWORTH. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49: 70-79.
9. CHARLESWORTH, D. AND B. CHARLESWORTH. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
10. CRUDEN, R. W. 1976. Intraspecific variation in pollen-ovule ratios and nectar secretion-preliminary evidence of ecotypic adaptation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 63: 277-289.
11. CRUDEN, R.W. AND S. M. HERMANN-PARKER. 1977. Temporal dioecism: An alternative to dioecism? Evolution 31: 863-866.
12. DEJONG, T. J., N. M. WASER, AND P. L. KLINKHAMER. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 321-325.
13. DEMAURO, M. M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conserv. Biol. 7: 542-550.
14. DUDASH, M. R. AND C. B. FENSTER. 2001. The role of breeding system and inbreeding depression in the maintenance of an outcrossing mating strategy in Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 1953-1959.
15. ECKERT, C. G. 2000. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a massflowering, clonal plant. Ecology 81: 532-542.
16. ECKERT, C. G. AND S. H. BARRETT. 1993. Clonal reproduction and patterns of genotypic diversity in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 1175-1182.
17. ELLE, E. AND J. D. HARE. 2002. Environmentally induced variation in floral traits affects the mating system in Datura wrightii. Funct. Ecol. 16: 79-88.
18. ELLSTRAND, N. C. AND M. L. ROOSE. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot. 74: 123-131.
19. FISHER, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eug. 11: 53-63.
20. FREEMAN, D. C., J. LOVETT DOUST, A. EL-KEBLAY, K. J. MIGLIA, AND E. D. MCARTHUR. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Bot. Rev. 63: 65-92.
21. GROSS, C. L. AND H. A. R. CADDY. 2006. Are differences in breeding mechanisms and fertility among populations contributing to rarity in Grevillea rhizomatosa (Proteaceae)? Am. J. Bot. 93: 1791-1799.
22. HAMRICK, J. L., M. J. W. GODT, D. A. MURAWSKI, AND M. D. LOVELESS. 1991. Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: implications for conservation biology, pp. 75-86. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
23. HARDER, L. S. AND S. H. BARRETT. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512-515.
24. HEYWOOD, V. H. AND J. M. IRIONDO. 2003. Plant conservation: old problems, new perspectives. Biol. Conserv. 113: 321-335.
25. HERLIHY, C. R. AND C. G. ECKERT. 2001. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416: 320-323.
26. HOLSINGER, K. E., M. W. FELDMAN, AND F. B. CHRISTIANSEN. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: a population genetic model. Am. Nat. 124: 446-453.
27. HOLSINGER, K. E. AND L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1991. Conservation of rare and endangered plants: principles and prospects, pp. 195-208. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
28. HOLSINGER, K. E. 2000. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 7037-7042.
29. JAIN, S. K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 24: 69-95.
30. KARRON, J. D. 1991. Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species, pp. 87-98. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
31. KEARNS, C. A. AND D. W. INOUYE. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwat, CO.
32. KLIPS, R. A. AND A. A. SNOW. 1997. Delayed autonomous self-pollination in Hibiscus laevis (Malvaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84: 48-53.
33. KONUMA, A. AND T. YAHARA. 1997. Temporally changing male reproductive success and resource allocation strategy in protandrous Heracleum lanatum (Apiaceae). J. Plant. Res. 110: 227-234.
34. KOUL, P., N. SHARMA, AND A. KOUL. 1993. Pollination biology of Apiaceae. Curr. Sci. 65: 219-222.
35. KRESS, J. W., G. D. MADDOX, AND C. S. ROESEL. 1994. Genetic variation and protection priorities in Ptilimnium nodosum (Apiaceae), an endangered plant of the eastern United States. Conserv. Biol. 8: 271-276.
36. KRAL, R. 1981. Notes on some "quill"-leaved umbellifers. Sida 9: 124-134.
37. LANDE, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 132: 911-927.
38. LINDSEY, A. H. 1982. Floral phenology patterns and breeding systems in Thaspium and Zizia (Apiaceae). Syst. Bot. 7: 1-12.
39. LLOYD, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67-79.
40. LLOYD, D. G. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 370-380.
41. LLOYD, D. G. AND C. J. WEBB. 1986. The avoidance of interference between presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zeal. J. Bot. 24: 135-162.
42. LOVETT DOUST, J. 1980. Floral sex ratios in andromonoecious Umbelliferae. New Phytol. 85: 265-273.
43. PANDIT, M.K. AND C. R. BABU. 2003. The effects of loss of sex in clonal populations of an endangered perennial Coptis teeta (Ranunculaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 143: 47-54.
44. PAVLIK, B. M. 1994. Demographic monitoring and the recovery of endangered plants, pp. 322-350. In M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan [eds.], Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
45. PONOMAREV, A. N. 1960. Concerning protandry in Umbelliferae. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 138: 750-752.
46. ROLLINS, R. 1967. The evolutionary fate of inbreeders and nonsexuals. Am. Nat. 101: 343-351.
47. SARGENT, R.D. AND B. D. ROITBERG. 2000. Seasonal decline in male-phase duration in a protandrous plant: a response to increased mating opportunities? Funct. Ecol. 14: 484-489.
48. SCHEMSKE, D. W. AND R. LANDE. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
49. SCHEMSKE, D. W., B. C. HUSBAND, M. H. RUCKELSHAUS, C. GOODWILLIE, I. M. PARKER, AND J. G. BISHOP. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75: 584-606.
50. SCHLESSMAN, M. A. 1982. Expression of andromonoecy and pollination of tuberous lomatiums (Umbelliferae). Syst. Bot. 7: 134-139.
51. SCHLESSMAN, M. A. AND L. M. GRACEFFA. 2002. Protogyny, pollination, and sex expression of andromonoecious Pseudocymopterus montanus (Apiaceae, Apioideae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 409-417.
52. SCHLESSMAN, M.A. AND F. BARRIE. 2004. Protogyny in Apiaceae, subfamily Apioideae: systematic and geographic distributions, associated traits, and evolutionary hypotheses. S. Afr. J. Bot. 70: 475-487.
53. SCHOEN, D. J., M. T. MORGAN, AND T. BATAILLON. 1996. How does self-pollination evolve? Inferences from floral ecology and molecular genetic variation. Philos. Tr. Soc. B. 1281-1290.
54. SCHULTZ, C. B. AND L. R. GERBER. 2002. Are recovery plans improving with practice? Ecol. Appl. 12: 641-647.
55. SIMBERLOFF, D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. 19: 473-511.
56. STEBBINS, G. L. 1957. Self fertilization and population variability in higher plants. Am. Nat. 91: 337-354.
57. THOMPSON, J. D. 1989. Deployment of ovules and pollen among flowers within inflorescences. Evol. Trend Plants 3: 65-68.
58. USFWS. 1990. Harperella (Ptilimnium nodosum) Recovery Plan. Newton Corner, MA.
59. VAN TREUREN, R., R. BULSMA, N. J. OUBORG, AND W. VAN DELDEN. 1993. The effects of population size and plant density on outcrossing rates in locally endangered Salvia pratensis. Evolution 47: 1094-1104.
60. WEAKLEY, A. S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas. North Carolina Botanical Garden. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
61. WEBB, C. 1981. Andromonoecism, protandry, and sexual selection in Umbelliferae. New Zeal. J. Bot. 19: 335-338.
62. WELLER, S. G. 1994. The relationship of rarity to plant reproductive biology, pp. 90-117. In M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan [eds.], Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
63. WELLS, M. S. AND D. G. LLOYD. 1991. Dichogamy, gender variation and bet-hedging in Pseudowintera colorata. Evol. Ecol. 5: 310-326.
64. XIE, Z. W., Y. Q. LU, S.GE, D.Y. HONG, AND F. Z. LI. 2001. Clonality in wild rice (Oryza rufipogon, Poaceae) and its implications for conservation management. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1058-1064.