Capsular contracture and possible implant rupture: Is magnetic resonance imaging useful?

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 125, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 830-835

  Paetau, Alyssa A ^b   McLaughlin, Sarah A ^b   McNeil, Rebecca B ^b   Sternberg, Erez ^b   Terkonda, Sarvam P ^b   Waldorf, James C ^b   Perdikis, Galen ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RUPTURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST IMPLANTS; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RUPTURE;

EID: 77749314947     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb6066     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chung KC, Beil RJ Jr, et al. Diagnosis of silicone gel breast implant rupture by ultrasonography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 97:104-109.
2. Holmich LR, Lipworth L, Friis S. Breast implant rupture and connective tissue disease: A review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):62S-69S.
3. Holmich LR, Vejborg IM, Conrad C, et al. Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:204- 214; discussion 215-216.
4. Kessler D. The basis of the FDA's decision on breast implant rupture. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1713-1715.
5. Brown SL, Soo MS, Pennello G. Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1057-1064.
6. Goodman CM, Cohen V, Thornby J, Netscher D. The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: A meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:577-585; discussion 585-586.
7. Holmich LR, Friis S, Fryzek JP, et al. Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture. Arch Surg. 2003;138:801-806.
8. Holmich LR, Kjøller K, Vejborg I, et al. Prevalence of silicone breast implant rupture among Danish women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:848-858; discussion 859-863.
9. Berg WA, Soo MS, Pennello G. MR imaging of extracapsular silicone from breast implants: Diagnostic pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:465-472.
10. Cher DJ, Conwell JA, Mandel JS. MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: Meta-analysis and implications. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47:367-380.
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Saline, Silicone Gel, and Alternative Breast Implants. 2006. Available at: https://imail.mayo.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp? URL=http://www.fda.gov/ MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulation andGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071228.htm. Accessed June 12, 2009.
12. Spear S, Willey SC, Robb GL, Hammond DC, Nahabedian MY. Surgery of the Breast. Principles and Art. 2nd ed. Philadelphia; 2006.
13. Destouet JM, Monsees BS, Oser RF, Nemecek JR, Pilgram TK. Screening mammography in 350 women with breast implants: Prevalence and findings of implant complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:973-978; discussion 979-981.
14. Gorczyca DP, DeBruhl ND, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model: Comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US, and CT. Radiology. 1994;190: 227-232.
15. Netscher DT, Weizer G, Thornby J. Diagnostic value of clinical examination and various imaging techniques for breast implant rupture as determined in 81 patients having implant removal. South Med J. 1996;89:397-404.
16. O'Toole M, Caskey CI. Imaging spectrum of breast implant complications: Mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:351-361.
17. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group: Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120(7 Suppl. 1):8S-16S; discussion 17S-18S.
18. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009; 33:440-444.
19. Ahn CY, DeBruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, Shaw WW, Bassett LW. Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: Experience with 59 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:620-627.
20. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:407-410.
21. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography. Radiographics 1993;13:1323-1336.
22. Gorczyca DP, Gorczyca SM, Gorczyca KL. The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120(7 Suppl. 1):49S-61S.
23. Ikeda DM, Borofsky HB, Herfkens RJ. Silicone breast implant rupture: Pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2054-2062.
24. Holmich LR, Fryzek JP, Kjøller K, et al. The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: Clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:583-589.
25. Chung KC, Greenfield ML, Walters M. Decision-analysis methodology in the work-up of women with suspected silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:689-695.
26. Peters W, Pritzker K, Smith D, et al. Capsular calcification associated with silicone breast implants: Incidence, determinants, and characterization Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41: 348-360.