Scalp and hair hygiene: Shampoos

The Science of Hair Care

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 83-128

  Beauquey, Bernard ^a  

^a L Oréal Recherche   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749306366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (124)

1. Adam WE, Neumann K. Konstitution und Eigenschaften von Tensiden. Fette Seifen Anstrichm 1980; 82: 367-370.
2. Adam WE, Neumann K. Alkylethersulfate - Ein Überblick aus Anewndungstechnischer Sicht. Fette Seifen Anstrichm 1978; 80(10): 392-401.
3. Gohlke FJ, Bergerhausen H. Seife Öle Fette Wächse 1967; 93(15): 519.
4. Harris BR. U. S. Patent 2, 023, 387. New York, NY: Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co, 1935.
5. Barker G, Barabash M, Sosis P. Formulating high-performance shampoos with alpha olefin sulfonates. Soap Cosm Chem Specialties, 1978; March: 38.
6. Linfield WM. Sulfopolycarboxylic derivatives. In: Linfield WM, ed. Anionic Surfactants II. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1976: 405-443.
7. De Jong HM, Brenkman JA, Aalbers JG. U. S. Patent 3, 038, 862. Bodegraven, The Netherlands: Chemische Fabrick “Andrelon”, 1962.
8. Vanlerberghe G, Sebag H. U. S. Patent 3. 959, 460. Paris: L’Oréal, 1976.
9. Vanlerberghe G, Sebag H. U. S. Patent 3, 983, 171. Paris: L’Oréal, 1976.
10. Derian PJ, Rica JM, Marcenac F, Vukov R, Tracy D, Dahanayake M. New generation of imidazoline derived amphoteric surfactants. Seife Öle Fette Wächse 1995; 121(6): 399-410.
11. Donaldson BR, Messenger ET. Perfomance characteristics and solutions properties of surfactants. Int J Cosmet Sci 1979; 1: 71-90.
12. Polano MK. The interaction of detergents and the human skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1968; 19: 3-20.
13. Smeenk G. The influence of detergent on the skin (a clinical and biochemical study). Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 1969; 235(2): 180-191.
14. Kalopissis G, Vanlerberghe G. U. S. Patent 3, 578, 719. Paris: L’Oréal, 1971.
15. Kalopissis G, Vanlerberghe G. U. S. Patent 3, 666, 671. Paris: L’Oréal, 1972.
16. Kalopissis G, Vanlerberghe G. U. S. Patent 3, 865, 542. Paris: L’Oréal, 1975.
17. Kalopissis G, Vanlerberghe G. U. S. Patent 3, 877, 955. Paris: L’Oréal, 1975.
18. Fischer E, et al. Chem Ber 1893; 26: 2400.
19. Kelkenberg H. Détergents á base de sucres. Tenside Surf Det 1988; 25: 8.
20. Ruback W, Schmidt S. Third International Workshop on Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, Wageningen, 1994.
21. Scholz HJ. Symposium Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Leverkusen, 1994.
22. Stalmans M, et al. The environmental properties of glucose amide-a new nonionic surfactant. Seife Öle Fette Wächse 1993; 119: 794.
23. Searle CE. Chemical Carcinogens. ACS-Monograph 182, Washington, DC, 1984: 755.
24. Klein K. Drug Cosmet Ind 1981; 129(1): 38, 40, 42.
25. Jönsson B, Lindman B, Holmberg K, Kronberg B. Foaming of surfactant solutions. In: Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution. New York: John Wiley&Sons, 1998: 325-336.
26. Salager JL, Andérez JM, Forgiarini A. Influence de la formulation sur les mousses, L’actualité Chimique 1999; April 10-21.
27. Israelachvili JN, Miitchell DJ, Ninham BW. Theory of self-assembly of hydrocarbon amphiphiles into micelles and bilayers. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1976; 2(72): 1525.
28. Stevenson DG. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1961; 12: 353-370.
29. Lange H. In: Shinod K, ed. Physical Chemistry of cleansing action, Solvent Properties of Surfactant Solutions. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1967: 177-188.
30. Alter H, Cook H. J Coll Interf Sci 1969; 29: 439-443.
31. Kamath YK, Dansizer CJ, Weigmann HD. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977; 28: 273-284.
32. Breuer MM. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1981; 32: 437-458.
33. Lawrence ASC. Nature 1959; 183: 1491.
34. Lawrence ASC. In: Durham K, ed. Surface Activity and Detergency. New York: Macmillan, 1961: 158.
35. Koch J, Aitzemuller K, Bittorf G, Waibel J. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1982; 33: 317-326.
36. Jones MN. Protein-Surfactant interactions. In: Magdassi S, ed. Surface Activity of Proteins Chemical and Physicochemical Modifications. New York, Basel, Hong Kong: Marcel Dekker, 1996: 237-284.
37. Gotte E. Synthetic tensids in medico-cosmetic baths. Aesthet med 1966; 10: 313-319.
38. Blake-Haskins JC, Scala D, Rhein LD, Robbins CR. Predicting surfactant irritation from the swelling response of a collagen film. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1986; 37: 199-210.
39. Robbins CR, Fernee KM. Some observations on the swelling of human epidermal membrane. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1983; 34: 21-34.
40. Tavss EA, Eigen E, Temnikov V, Kligman AM. Effect of protein cationicity on inhibition of in vitro epidermis curling by alkylbenzene sulfonate. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1986; 63: 574-579.
41. Javed S, Misra V, Viswanathan PN. In vitro studies on the effect of linear alkyl benzene sulfonate on serum albumin. Int J Cosmet Sci 1988; 10: 241-246.
42. Paye M. Models for studying surfactant interactions with the skin. In: Broze G, ed. Handbook of Detergents, Part A: Properties, Surfactant Science Series. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1999: 82: 469-509.
43. Rieger M. Surfactant interactions with skin. Cosmet Toiletries 1995; 110: 31-50.
44. Dykes P. Surfactants and the skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 1998; 20: 53-61.
45. Polefka TG. Surfactants interactions with skin. In: Broze G, ed. Handbook of Detergents, Part A: Properties, Surfactant Science Series. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1999: 82: 433-468.
46. Corcuff P, Chatenay F, Saint-léger D. Hair-skin relationships: a new approach to desquamation. Bioeng Skin 1985; 1-2: 133-139.
47. Pierard GE, Goffin V, Pierard-Franchimont C. Corneosurfametry: a predictive assessment of the interaction of personal care cleansing products with human Stratum-Corneum. Dermatology 1994; 189: 152-156.
48. Goffin V, Paye M, Pierard GE. Corneosurfametry as in vitro predictive test for skin irritation potential: comparison to in vivo data. Proceedings of Colipa Symposium on Alternatives to Animal testings, Brussels, 1995: 296-302.
49. Zviak C. The Science of Hair Care. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1986.
50. Valkovic V. Human Hair. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1988.
51. Robbins CR. Chemical and Physical Behavior of Human Hair. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest: Springer Verlag, 1994.
52. Sandhu SS, Robbins CR. A simple and sensitive technique based on protein loss measurements, to assess surface damage to human hair. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1993; 44: 163-175.
53. Van Scott EJ, Lyon JB. A chemical measure of the effect of soaps and detergents on the skin. J Invest Dermatol 1953; 21: 199-203.
54. Sandhu SS, Ramachandra R, Robbins CR. A simple and sensitive method using protein loss measurements to evaluate damage to human hair during combing. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1995; 46: 39-52.
55. Goddard ED. Mechanisms in combination cleaner/conditioner systems. J Cosmet Sci 2002; 53: 283-286.
56. Grote MB, Russel GD. European Patent EP 181773. Cincinnati, OH: The Procter et Gamble Company, 1986.
57. Reid ES, Murray AM. European Patent EP 432951. London: Unilever PLC, 1991.
58. Murray AM. PCT WO 95/09599. London: Unilever PLC, Rotterdam: Unilever N.V, 1995.
59. Sebag H, Dubief C, Beauquey B. European Patent EP 457688. Paris: L’Oréal, 1994.
60. Zysman A, Vanlerberghe G, Semeria D. European Patent EP 500437. Paris: L’Oréal, 1991.
61. Dubief C, Cauwet D, Beauquey B. European Patent EP 739625. Paris: L’Oréal, 1994.
62. Hussler G, Kaba G, François AM, Saint-Léger D. Isolation and identification of human hair ceramides. Int J Cosmet Sci 1995; 17: 197-206.
63. Leroy F, Franbourg A, Grognet JC, Vayssié C, Bauer D. First Tricontinental Meeting of Hair Research Societies. Bruxelles, 1995.
64. Grollier JF, Fourcadier C, Dubief C. French Patent FR 2597335. Paris: L’Oréal, 1986.
65. Howe AM, Flowers AE. Introduction to shampoo thickening. Cosmet Toiletries 2000; 115(12): 63-69.
66. Hitchen DA. European Patent EP 463, 780. London: Unilever PLC, 1992.
67. Dubief C, Fiquet C, Cauwet D, Fourcadier C, Grollier JF. French Patent FR 2,383,660. Paris: L’Oréal, 1977.
68. Fiquet C, J.F. Grollier. French Patent FR 2470596. Paris: L’Oréal, 1979.
69. Recommendation ISO R696, 1974.
70. French Standard Norme AFNOR T73-404, November 1966. Agents de surface -Mesure du pouvoir moussant.
71. Ross J, Miles GD. An apparatus for comparison of foaming properties of soaps and detergents. Oil and Soap 1941; 18: 99-102.
72. Norme AFNOR T73-413, May 1983. Agents de surface - Détermination de I’aptitude au moussage (pouvoir moussant), du pouvoir antimoussant et de la stabillité de la mousse - Méthode par barbotage.
73. Domingo X, Fiquet L, Meijer H. Foam ability/stability of surfactants. Tenside Surf Det 1992; 29: 16-22.
74. Ross S. Current methods of measuring foam. Ind Eng Chem (Anal. ed) 1943; 15: 329-334.
75. Bock H. Seife Öle Fette Wachse 1967; 93: 213-220.
76. Bromley JM. Modern trends in the assessment of shampoos. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1964; 15: 631-639.
77. Neu GE. Techniques of foam measurement. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1960; 11: 390-414.
78. Hart J. Shampoo lather, a reliable test. Cosmet Toiletries 1985; 100: 58-66.
79. Domingo Campos FJ, Druguet Tantinã RM. Evaluation of the foaming capacity of shampoos: efficacy of various experimental methods. Cosmet Toiletries 1983; 98: 131.
80. Bikerman JJ. The unit of foaminess. Trans Faraday Soc 1938; 34: 634.
81. Standard DIN 53902 part. 1: Testing of surface active agents - Determination of foaming power, modified Ross-Miles method.
82. Thompson D, Lemaster C, Allen R, Whittam J. Evaluation of relative shampoo detergency. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1985; 36: 271-286.
83. Clarke J, Robbins CR, Schroff B. Selective removal of sebum components from hair by surfactants. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1989; 40: 309-320.
84. Barnett G, Powers DH. A quantitative method for the evaluation and study of shampoos. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1951; 2: 219-228.
85. Shaw A. Hair lipid and surfactants. Extraction of lipid by surfactants and lack of effect of shampooing on rate re-fatting of hair. Int J Cosmet Sci 1979; 1: 317-328.
86. Curry KV, Golding S. Hair lipids-I. the extraction of fatty materials from hair clippings. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1971; 22: 681-699.
87. Scott GV, Robbins CR. Effects of surfactant solutions on hair fiber friction. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1980; 31: 179-200.
88. Gloor M. Determination and analysis of sebum on skin and hair. In: Breuer MM, ed., Cosmetic Science. vol. 1. London: Academic Press, 1978: 217-273.
89. Koch J, Aitzetmueller K, Bittorf G, Waibel J. Hair lipids and their contribution to the perception of hair oiliness. Part I: Surface and internal lipids in hair. Part II: Correlation between subjective assessment of hair oiliness and quantity and composition of hair surface lipids. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1982; 33: 317-343.
90. Dobinson GC, Petter PJ. Sensory perception and evaluation of hair greasiness. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1976; 27: 3-14.
91. French standard Norme AFNOR NF T90-003 (Aoû t 84). Essais des eaux-Détermination de la concentration totale en calcium et magnésium-Méthode titrimétrique à l’EDTA.
92. Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82: 377.
93. Cottin M, De Silva O, Roguet R, Catroux P, Toufic A, Dossou KG. In vitro methods: their relevance and complementarity in ocular safety assessment. Lens Eye Toxicity Research 1992; 9: 229.
94. Bagley DM, Bruner LH, De Silva O, Cottin M, O’Brien KAF, Uttley M, Walker AP. An évaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicol In Vitro 1992; 6: 275.
95. Gautheron P, Giroux J, Cottin M, et al. Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8: 381.
96. Harbell JW, et al. Report from the bovine corneal opacity and permeability technical workshop, November 3-4 1998. In vitro Mol Toxicol 1998; 11: 314.
97. Sina JF. Validation of the bovine corneal opacity-permeability assay as a predictor of ocular irritation potential. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 7: 283.
98. Gautheron P, Dukic M, Alix D, Sina JF. Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fund Applied Toxicol 1992; 18: 442.
99. Rosenbluth SA, Weddington GR, Guess WL, Autian J. Tissue culture method for screening toxicity of plastic materials to be used in medical practice. J Pharm Sci 1965; 54: 156.
100. Cottin M, Zanvit A, Faquet B, et al. Critical evaluation of an agarose diffusion method for the assessment of eye irritancy. Atla 1993; 21: 427.
101. Combrier E, Castelli D. The agarose overlay method as a screening approach for ocular irritancy: application to cosmetic products. Atla 1992; 20: 438.
102. Wallin RF, Hume RG, Jackson EM. The agarose diffusion method for ocular irritancy screening: cosmetic products, part I. J Tox Cut Ocular Toxicol 1987; 6: 239.
103. O’Brien KAF, Jones PA, Rockley J. Evaluation of an agarose overlay assay to determine the eye irritation: potential of detergent-based products. Toxicol In Vitro 1993; 4: 311.
104. De Silva O, Rougier A, Dossou KG. The Het-Cam test: study of the irritation potential of chemicals and formulations. Atla 1992; 20: 432.
105. Luepke NP. Hen’s egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food Chem Toxicol 1985; 23: 287.
106. Gordon VC, Berman HC. An in vitro method for the evaluation of ocular irritancy. In: Golberg AM, ed. In vitro Toxicology. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, 1987: 309.
107. Roguet R, Dossou KG, Rougier A. Prediction of eye irritation potential of surfactants using SIRC-NR cytotoxicity test. Atla 1992; 20: 451.
108. Shaw AJ, Clothier RH, Balls M. Loss of transepithelial impermeability of a confluent monolayer of MDCK cells as a determinant of ocular irritancy potential. Atla 1990; 18: 145.
109. Harbell JW, Koontz SW, et al. Cell cytotoxicity assay. IRAG working Group 4. Fd Chem Toxicol 1997; 35: 79.
110. Tchao R. Trans-epithelial permeability of fluorescein in vitro as an assay to determine eye irritants. In: Golberg AM, ed. Alternative Methods in toxicology. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, 1988, 6: 271.
111. Decker D, Harper R. Evaluation of a three-dimensional human dermal model as a predictor of shampoo ocular irritation. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8: 167.
112. Osborne R, Perkins MA, Roberts D. Development and interlaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments. Fund Appl Toxicol 1995; 28: 139.
113. Gay RJ, Swiderek M, Nelson D, Stephens TJ. The living dermal equivalent as an in vitro model for predicting ocular irritation. J Tox Cut Ocular Toxicol 1992; 11: 47.
114. Rachui SR, Robertson W, Duke MA, Heinze J. Predicting the ocular irritation potential of surfactants using the in vitro skin2 model ZK 1200. J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol 1994; 13: 215.
115. Roguet R, Cohen C, Dossou KG, Rougier A. Episkin, a reconstructed human epidermis for assessing in vitro the irritancy of topically applied compounds. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 8: 283.
116. Brantom PG, Bruner LH, Chamberlain M, et al. A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicol In Vitro 1997; 11: 141.
117. Balls M, Berg N, Bruner LH, et al. Eye irritation testing: the way forward. Atla 1999; 27: 53.
118. Cottin M, Dossou KG, De Silva O, et al. Relevance and reliability of in vitro methods in ocular safety assessment. Toxicol In Vitro 1994; 7: 277.
119. Declaration of Helsinki adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975, 35th World Medical Assembly, Venece, Italy, October 1983, 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989, and the 48th General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 1996.
120. Bonnes pratiques cliniques. Avis au promoteurs et aux investigateurs pour les essais cliniques des médicaments. Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de l’Emploi. Ministère chargé de la Santé et de la Famille, France, 1987.
121. Protection des personnes dans la recherche biomédicale. Tome I-Textes législatifs, réglementaires et internationaux. Tome II-Guide des textes législatifs et réglementaires. République Française. Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de l’intégration. Loi n°88-1138 du 20 décembre 1988 (J.O. du 22 décembre 1988) modifiée par la loi n°90-86 du 23 janvier 1990 (J.O. du 25 janvier 1990), Septembre 1990.
122. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.
123. ICH Topic E6. Guideline for Clinical Practice, May 1, 1996.
124. Health and Human Services Department, FDA. Protection of Human Subjects, Informed Consent, Institutional Review Boards, 1981 (Federal Register, Vol. 46, N. 17, 27.1.81).