Systematic revision of the epipetrum group of dioscorea (dioscoreaceae) endemic to chile

Systematic Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 40-63

  Viruel, Juan ^a   Segarra Moragues, José G ^a   Pérez Collazos, Ernesto ^a   Villar, Luis ^b   Catalán, Pilar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO PIRENAICO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; Morphology; Pollen; SEM; South America; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

DIOSCOREA; DIOSCOREA ALATA; DIOSCOREACEAE;

EID: 77749304260     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364410790862579     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson, T. W. 1996. R. A. Fisher and Multivariate Analysis. Statistical Science 11: 20-34.
2. Baum, B. R.1989. Theory and practice of botanical classification- cladistics, phenetics and classical approaches - critical summary - Botanical Systematics in 1987. Plant Systematics and Evolution 166: 197-210.
3. Bertero, C. G. 1829. Lista de plantas que han sido observadas en Chile por el Dr. Bertero en 1828. El Mercurio Chileno 12: 551-564.
4. Bousalem, M., G. Arnau, I. Hochu, R. Arnolin, V. Viader, S. Santoni, and J. David. 2006. Microsatellite segregation analysis and cytogenetic evidence for tetrasomic inheritance in the American yam Dioscorea trifida and a new basic chromosome number in the Dioscoreae. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 113: 439-451.
5. Bruni, A., B. Tosi, and P. Modenesi. 1987. Morphology and secretion of glandular trichomes in Tamus communis. Nordic Journal of Botany 7: 79-84.
6. Burkill, I. H. 1960. The organography and the evolution of Dioscoreaceae, the family of the yams. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 56: 319-412.
7. Caddick, L. R., C. A. Furness, K. L. Stobart, and P. J. Rudall. 1998. Microsporogenesis and pollen morphology in Dioscoreales and allied taxa. Grana 37: 321-336.
8. Caddick, L. R., P. J. Rudall, P. Wilkin, T. A. J. Hedderson, and M. W. Chase. 2002a. Phylogenetics of Dioscoreales based on combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 138: 123-144.
9. Caddick, L. R., P. Wilkin, P. J. Rudall, T. A. J. Hedderson, and M. W. Chase. 2002b. Yams reclassified: a recircumscription of Dioscoreaceae and Dioscoreales. Taxon 51: 103-114.
10. Catalán, P., J. G. Segarra-Moragues, M. Palop-Esteban, C. Moreno, and F. González-Candelas. 2006. A Bayesian approach for discriminating among alternative inheritance hypotheses in plant polyploids: the allotetraploid origin of genus Borderea (Dioscoreaceae). Genetics 172: 1939-1953.
11. Christensen, I. K. 1984. The morphological variation of some Crataegus populations (Rosaceae) in Greece and Yugoslavia. Nordic Journal of Botany 4: 585-595.
12. Colla, L. A. 1836. Plantae rariores in regionibus Chilensibus a clarisimo m. d. Bertero nuper detectae et ab A. Colla in lucem editae. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 39: 9-14.
13. Fisher, R. A. 1936. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7: 179-188.
14. Govaerts, R., P. Wilkin, and R. M. K. Saunders. 2007. World checklist of Dioscoreales: yams and their allies. Kew: Kew Publishing.
15. Hechenleitner, V. P., M. F. Gardner, P. I. Thomas, C. Echeverría, B. Escobar, P. Brownless, and A. C. Martínez. 2005. Plantas amenazadas del Centro-Sur de Chile. Distribución, conservación y propagación. Valdivia: Univer-sidad Austral de Chile y Real Jardín Botánico de Edimburgo.
16. Heslot, H. 1953. Le nombre chromosomique des Dioscoréacées pyrénéennes et leur rattachement au genre Borderea Miégeville. Comptes Rendus à l'Académie des Sciences de Paris 237: 433-434.
17. IUCN. 2008. Red list categories and criteria (version 3.1). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
18. Knuth, R. 1924. Dioscoreaceae. Pp. 1-387 in Das Pflanzenreich 87(IV), ed. H. G. A. Engler. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
19. Koutecky, P. 2007. Morphological and ploidy level variation of Centaurea phrygia agg. (Asteraceae) in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ukraine. Folia Geobotanica 42: 77-102.
20. Marticorena, C., F. A. Squeo, G. Arancio, and M. Muñoz. 2001. Catálogo de la flora vascular de la IV Región de Coquimbo. Pp. 105 - 142 in Libro Rojo de la flora nativa y de los sitios prioritarios para su conservación: Región de Coquimbo, eds. F. A. Squeo, G. Arancio, and J. R. Gutiérrez. La Serena, Chile: Ediciones de la Universidad de La Serena.
21. Matuda, E. 1961. Nuevas plantas de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 32: 143-147.
22. McCauley, R. A. and H. E. Ballard. 2007. Systematics of North American Froelichia (Amaranthaceae subfam. Gomphrenoideae) I: Identification of consistent morphological variation and segregation of species complexes. Brittonia 59: 255-274.
23. Meurman, O. 1925. The chromosome behaviour of some dioecious plants and their relatives with special reference to sex chromosomes. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Biologicae 2: 1-105.
24. Milne-Redhead, E. 1963. Dioscoreaceae. Kew Bulletin 17: 177-179.
25. Oja, T. and J. Paal. 2006. Multivariate analysis of morphological variation among closely related species Bromus japonicus, B. squarrosus and B. arvensis (Poaceae) in comparison with isozyme evidences. Nordic Journal of Botany 24: 691-702.
26. Orr, M. 1926. On the secretory organs of the Dioscoreaceae. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden of Edinburgh 15: 133-146.
27. Pax, F. A. 1887. Dioscoreaceae. Pp. 133-137 in Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2(5), eds. H. G. A. Engler and K. A. E. Prantl. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelman.
28. Philippi, R. A. 1862. Descripción de unas plantas nuevas, recogidas en el verano pasado en la provincia del Maule y Chillan por Don Jerman Volckmann. Anales de la Universidad de Chile 21: 442-450.
29. Philippi, R. A. 1864. Plantarum novarum Chilensiam centuriae, inclusis quihusdam Mendocis et Patagonicis. Linnaea 33: 1-308.
30. Philippi, R. A. 1892. Epipetrum bilobum Ph. Anales del Museo Nacional de Santiago de Chile 11, table 3. fig. 1.
31. Philippi, R. A. 1896. Plantas nuevas Chilenas, de las familias que corres-ponden al tomo VI de la obra de Gay. Anales de la Universidad de Chile 93: 5-24.
32. Pimentel, M. and E. Sahuquillo. 2007. Infraspecific variation and phylogeography of the high-polyploid Iberian endemic Anthoxanthum amarum Brot. (Poaceae; Pooideae) assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers (RAPDs) and morphology. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 155: 179-192.
33. Reiche, K. 1908. Zur kenntnis der Dioscoreaceen-gattung Epipetrum Phil. Botanische Jahrbucher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 42: 178-190.
34. Robart, B. W. 2005. Morphological diversification and taxonomy among the varieties of Pedicularis bracteosa Benth. (Orobanchaceae). Systematic Botany 30: 644-656.
35. Scarcelli, N., O. Dainou, C. Agbangla, S. Tostain, and J. L. Pham. 2005. Segregation patterns of isozyme loci and microsatellite markers show the diploidy of African yam Dioscorea rotundata (2n = 40). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 226-232.
36. Schols, P., C. A. Furness, P. Wilkin, S. Huysmans, and E. Smets. 2001. Morphology of pollen and orbicules in some Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) species and its systematic implications. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 295-311.
37. Schols, P., C. A. Furness, P. Wilkin, E. Smets, V. Cielen, and S. Huysmans. 2003. Pollen morphology of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) and its relation to systematics. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 375-390.
38. Schols, P., P. Wilkin, C.A. Furness, S. Huysmans, and E. Smets. 2005. Pollen evolution in Yams (Dioscorea: Dioscoreaceae). Systematic Botany 30: 750-758.
39. Segarra, J. G. and P. Catalán. 2005. Borderea Miégeville. Pp. 11-14 in: Flora Iberica vol. 21, eds. C. Aedo and A. Herrero. Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico de Madrid-C. S. I. C.
40. Shapiro, S. S. and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591-611.
41. Smith, B. W. 1937. Notes on the cytology and distribution of the Dioscoreaceae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 64: 189-197.
42. Téllez-Valdés, O. and P. Dávila-Aranda. 1998. Nanarepenta juxtlahuacensis (Dioscoreaceae), una nueva especie de Oaxaca, México. Novon 8: 210-214.
43. Torrecilla, P., J.A.L. Rodríguez, D. Stancik, and P. Catalán. 2003. Systematics of Festuca L. sects. Eskia Willk., Pseudatropis Kriv., Amphigenes (Janka) Tzvel., Pseudoscariosa Kriv. and Scariosae Hack. based on analysis of morphological characters and DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 239: 113-139.
44. Viruel, J., J. G. Segarra-Moragues, E. Pérez-Collazos, L. Villar, and P. Catalán. 2008. The diploid nature of the Chilean Epipetrum and a new base number in the Dioscoreaceae. New Zealand Journal of Botany 46: 327-339.
45. Viruel, J., J. G. Segarra-Moragues, E. Pérez-Collazos, P. Catalán, L. Villar, Z. Díaz-Lifante, B. Valdés, and J. Müller. 2009. Proposal to reject the name Luzuriaga cordata (Dioscoreaceae). Taxon 58: 1007.
46. Visanta-Vinacua, B. 1998. Análisis estadístico con SPSS para Windows. Madrid: McGraw-Hill. Interamericana de España.
47. Wilkin, P., P. Schols, M. W. Chase, C. Kongkanda, C. A. Furness, S. Huysmans, F. Rakotonasolo, E. Smets, and C. Thapyai. 2005. A plastid gene phylogeny of the yam genus, Dioscorea: roots, fruits and Madagascar. Systematic Botany 30: 736-749.
48. Wilks, S. S. 1932. Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 24: 471-494.