Nonhuman animal experiments in the european community: Human values and rational choice

Society and Animals

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-20

  Peggs, Kay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal; Ethics; European community; Experiments; Human; Nonhuman; Rational choice

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 77749304155     PISSN: 10631119     EISSN: 15685306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853010790799776     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, C. J. (1995). Neither man nor beast: Feminism and the defense of animals. New York: Continuum.
2. Archer, M. S., & Tritter, J. Q. (2000). In M. S. Archer & J. Q. Tritter (Eds.). Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization, Introduction (pp. 1-16). London: Sage.
3. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. -- (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. -- (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Beckford, J. (2000). When the battle's lost and won. In M. S. Archer & J. Q. Tritter (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization (pp. 219-233). London: Sage.
7. Commission of the European Communities (2007). Fifth statistical report on laboratory animals com/2007/675/final. In Laboratory animals: Statistical reports. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ chemicals/lab-animals/reports-en.htm.
8. -- (2008a). Commission staff working paper accompanying the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific experiments: Impact assessment. Commission of the European Communities: Brussels SEC (2008). 2410/2.
9. -- (2008b). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific experiments. Commission of the European Communities: Brussels 2008/0211 (COD).
10. -- (1986). Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Brussels: Council of European Communities Publications Office.
11. Craven, J. (1992). Social choice: A framework for collective decisions and individual judgements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Derrida, J. (2004). Th e animal that therefore I am (more to follow). In P. Atterton & M. Calarco (Eds.), Animal philosophy: Essential readings in Continental thought (pp. 113-128). London & New York: Continuum.
13. Emel, J., & Wolch, J. (1998). Witnessing the animal moment. In J. Wolch & J. Emel (Eds.), Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderland (pp. 1-24). London & New York: Verso.
14. Fine, R., & Hirsh, D. (2000). Th e decision to commit a crime against humanity. In M. S. Archer & J. Q. Tritter (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization (pp. 183-199). London: Sage.
15. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
16. Fuller, S. (2006). Th e new sociological imagination. London: Sage
17. Garner, R. (2005). Animal ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Gray, J. (2003). Straw dogs: Th oughts on humans and other animals. London: Granta.
19. Greek, C. R., & Greek, J. S. (2002). Specious science: How genetics and evolution reveal why medical research on animals harms humans. London & New York: Continuum.
20. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest witness@second millenium: Femaleman meets OncoMouse. London & New York: Routledge.
21. Kean, H. (1998). Animal rights: Political and social change in Britain since 1800. London: Reaktion Books.
22. Laclau, E. (1990). New refl ections on the revolution of our time. London & New York: Verso.
23. Midgley, M. (2002). Beast and man. London: Routledge.
24. -- (2004 ).Th e myths we live by. London: Routledge.
25. Nibert, D. (2002). Animal rights / human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26. Charles River. (2009). [News Release]. Sales decrease 12.5% to $308 million. Retrieved September 2009, from: *http://ir.criver. com/phoenix.zhtml?c=121668&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1316713&highlight=
27. Peggs, K. (2009a.) A hostile world for nonhuman animals: Human identification and the oppression of nonhuman animals for human good. Sociology 43(1), 85-102.
28. Peggs, K. & Lampard, R. (2000). (Ir)rational choice: A multidimensional approach to choice and constraint in decisions about marriage, divorce and remarriage. In M. S. Archer & J. Q. Tritter (Eds.), Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization (pp. 93-110). London: Sage.
29. Research Defence Society. (2007). Medical advances and animal research. Th e contribution of animal science to the medical revolution: Some case histories. RDS: Understanding Animal Research in Medicine and Coalition for Medical Progress. http://www.pro-test.org.uk/MAAR.pdf.
30. Rowlands, M. (2002). Animals like us. London & New York: Verso.
31. Singer, P. (2002). Unsanctifying human life (H. Kuhse, Ed.). Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.
32. Tester, K. (1992). Animals and society: Th e humanity of animal rights. London: Routledge.
33. Welchman, J. (2003). Xenografting, species loyalty, and human solidarity. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4(2), 244-255.
34. Williams, B. (2006). Philosophy as a humanistic discipline. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1998). Preface. In J. Wolch & J. Emel (Eds.), Animal geographies: Place, politics and identity in the nature-culture borderland (pp. xi-xx). London & New York: Verso.
36. Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London : Sage.
37. Zafirovski, M. (1999). What is really rational choice? Beyond the utilitarian concept of rationality. Current Sociology, 47(1), 47-113.