Carrier-envelope phase effect on atomic excitation by few-cycle rf pulses

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 104, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Li, Hebin ^a   Sautenkov, Vladimir A ^a,b   Rostovtsev, Yuri V ^a,c   Kash, Michael M ^a,d   Anisimov, Petr M ^e   Welch, George R ^a   Scully, Marlan O ^a,f  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LEBEDEV PHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^d LAKE FOREST COLLEGE   (United States)

^e LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC COHERENCE; ATOMIC EXCITATIONS; ATOMIC STATE; CARRIER FREQUENCY; CARRIER-ENVELOPE PHASE EFFECTS; DENSITY MATRIX EQUATIONS; FEW-CYCLE; HYPERFINE LEVELS; PHASE DIFFERENCE; POPULATION TRANSFER; RABI FREQUENCY; RADIO FREQUENCY PULSE; RF PULSE; RUBIDIUM ATOMS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

RUBIDIUM;

ATOMS;

EID: 77749298250     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.103001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. T. Brabec and F. Krausz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 545 (2000). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.545
2. A. deBohan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1837 (1998). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1837
3. G.G. Paulus, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 414, 182 (2001). 10.1038/35102520
4. A. Gurtler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033002 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.033002
5. V. Roudnev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 163601 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.163601
6. T.M. Fortier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 147403 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.147403
7. S.A. Diddams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5102 (2000) PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5102
8. Y.Y. Yin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2353 (1992). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2353
9. M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Academic Press, London, 2000), Vol. 42, pp. 287-345.
10. A. Haché, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 306 (1997). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.306
11. D.J. Jones, Science 288, 635 (2000). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.288.5466.635
12. A. Baltuska, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 421, 611 (2003). 10.1038/nature01414
13. A.J. Verhoef, Opt. Lett. 31, 3520 (2006). OPLEDP 0146-9592 10.1364/OL.31.003520
14. T. Wittmann, Nature Phys. 5, 357 (2009). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1250
15. S. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3363 (1998); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3363
16. N. Doslic, Phys. Rev. A 74, 013402 (2006); PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.013402
17. C. Jirauschek, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 2065 (2005). JOBPDE 0740-3224 10.1364/JOSAB.22.002065
18. L.Y. Peng, New J. Phys. 10, 025030 (2008). NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/025030
19. Y.V. Rostovtsev, Phys. Rev. A 79, 063833 (2009). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.063833
20. F. Bloch and A. Siegert, Phys. Rev. 57, 522 (1940). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.57.522
21. N.F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 76, 996 (1949). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.76.996
22. C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Optical Pumping and Interaction of Atoms with the Electromagnetic Field, in Cargese Lectures in Physics Vol. 2, edited by, M. Levy, (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1968), pp. 347-393.