The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: Evidence from the arrow flanker task

Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 990-994

  Chen, Jia ^a   Li, Chang ^a   He, ChunHong ^a   Chen, An Tao ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Attention strategies; Conflict adaptation; Fixation; Flanker task; Intertrial interval

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77749261691     PISSN: 10069305     EISSN: 18622798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-009-0123-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gratton G, Coled M G H, Donchin E. optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen, 1992, 121: 480-506.
2. Eriksen B A, Eriksen C W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys, 1974, 16: 143-149.
3. Botvinick M M, Braver T S, Barch D M, et al. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev, 2001, 108: 624-652.
4. Botvinick M M, Cohen J D, Carter C S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci, 2004, 8: 539-546.
5. Mayr U, Awh E, Laurey P. conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat Neurosci, 2003, 6: 450-452.
6. Hommel B. Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends Cogn Sci, 2004, 8: 494-500.
7. Hommel B. Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes. Vis Cognit, 1998, 5: 183-216.
8. Egner T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci, 2007, 7: 380-39.
9. Ullsperger M, Bylsma L M, Botvinick M M. The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci, 2005, 5: 467-472.
10. Nieuwenhuis S, Stins J F, Posthuma D. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Mem Cognit, 2006, 34: 1260-1272.
11. Zeef E J, Sonke C J, Kok A, et al. Perceptual factors affecting age-related differences in focused attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses. Psychophysiology, 1996, 33: 555-565.
12. Rowe G, Hirsh J B, Anderson A K. Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 104: 383-388.
13. Notebaert W, Gevers W, Verbruggen F, et al. Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychon Bull Rev, 2006, 13: 112-117.
14. Müller H J, Rabbitt P M. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 1989, 15: 315-330.