Effect of source-sink manipulation on yield components and photosynthetic characteristic of wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum and T. durum L.)

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 564-569

  Bijanzadeh, E ^a   Emam, Y ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

100 grain weight; Net photosynthesis rate; Sink or source restriction; Wheat yield components

Indexed keywords

100-GRAIN WEIGHT; NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS RATE; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS; RESTRICTION CONDITION; SINK OR SOURCE RESTRICTION; SOURCE-SINK RELATIONSHIPS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; WHEAT YIELD;

CULTIVATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PLANTS (BOTANY);

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

EID: 77749252317     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2010.564.569     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aggarwal, P.K., R.A. Fischer and S. P. Liboon, 1990. Source-sink relation and effects of post anthesis canopy defoliation in wheat at low latitudes. J. Agric. Sci., 114: 93-99.
2. Ahmadi, A. and M. Joudi, 2007. Effects of timing and defoliation intensity on growth, yield and gas exchange rate of wheat grown under well-watered and drought conditions. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 3794-3800.
3. Ahmadi, A., M. Joudi and M. Janmohammadi, 2009. Late defoliation and wheat yield: Little evidence of post-anthesis source limitation. Field Crops Res., 113: 90-93.
4. Alam, M.S., A.H.M.M. Rahman, M.N. Nesa, S.K. Khan and N.A. Siddquie, 2008. Effect of source and/or sink restriction on the grain yield in wheat. Eur. J. Applied Sci. Res., 4: 258-261.
5. Bingham, I.I., J. Blake, M.J. Foulke and J. Spink, 2006. Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? I. Post-anthesis radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and source-sink balance. Field Crops Res., 101: 198-211.
6. Borras, L., G.A. Slafer and M.E. Otegui, 2004. Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulation in wheat, maize and soybean: A quantitative reappraisal. Field Crop Res., 86: 131-146.
7. Chowdhary, M.A., N. Mahmood, T.R. Rashid and I. Khaliq, 1999. Effect of leaf area removal on grain yield and its components in spring wheat. Rachis, 18: 75-78.
8. Emam, Y. and H.R. Karimi, 1996. Influence of chloromequat chloride on five winter barley cultivars. Iran Agric. Res., 15: 101-114.
9. Emam, Y. and M. Dastfal, 1997. Above and below ground responses of winter barley plants to chloromequat in moist and drying soil. Crop Res., 14: 457-470.
10. Emam, Y. and M.J. Seghatoleslami, 2005. Crop Yield. Shiraz University Press. Iran, ISBN: 964-462-362-2 593.
11. Emam, Y., 2007. Cereal Production. 3rd Edn., Shiraz University Press, Iran, 190.
12. Emam, Y., M.A. Montazeri and K. Poustini, 1997. Effect of nitrogen and Chloromequat on growth and grain yield of winter barley cultivar Valfajr. Iran Agric. Res., 16: 127-138.
13. Ferdous, J. and A.K.M. Shamsuddin, 2001. Effects of source-sink manipulation on grain yield and important sink characters in spring wheat. Bangladesh J. Plant Breed. Genet., 14: 7-21.
14. Fischer, R.A. and D.H.R. Lambers, 1978. Effect of environment and cultivar on source limitation to grain weight in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 29: 443-458.
15. Koc, N., C. Barutcular and I. Genc, 2003. Photosynthesis and productivity of old and modern durum whet in Mediterranean environment. Crop Sci., 43: 2089-2098.
16. Ma, Y.Z., C.T. Mackown, D.V. Sanford and S.D. Van, 1990. Sink manipulation in wheat: Compensatory changes in kernel size. Crop Sci., 30: 1099-1105.
17. Macedo, T.B., R.K.D. Peterson and D.K. Weaver, 2006. Characterization of the impact of wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton, on pigment composition and photosystem II photochemistry of wheat heads. Environ. Entomol., 35: 1115-1120.
18. Richards, R.A., 1996. Increasing the yield potential of wheat: Manipulating source and sinks. In increasing yield potential wheat. Proceedings of the Workshop on Breaking the Barriers, (BB'96), Mexico, pp: 134-149.
19. Rohi, E. and A. Siose Mardeh, 2008. Study on gas exchange in different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Plant Seed, 24: 45-62.
20. Roy, S.K. and A.B.M. Salahuddin, 1994. Effect of spikelet thinning on individual seed weight and seed yield of wheat under two sowing dates. J. Appl. Seed Prod., 12: 83-85.
21. SAS, 2000. Statistical Analysis Software. Version 8, SAS Inst., Cary, NC., USA.
22. Savin, R. and G.A. Slafer, 1991. Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar. J. Agric. Sci., 116: 1-7.
23. Shekoofa, A. and Y. Emam, 2008. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) CV Shiraz. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 10: 101-108.
24. Simmons, R.S., R.K. Crookston and J.E. Kurle, 1982. Growth of spring wheat kernels as influenced by reduced kernel number per spike and defoliation. Crop Sci., 22: 983-988.
25. Singh, D. and D. Singh, 2002. Effect of leaf blade and awn on grain yield of rainfed wheat (Triticum estivum L.) at different stages of spike development. Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 72: 468-471.
26. Wang, Z., J. Fu, M. He, Q. Tian and H. Cao, 1997. Effects of source/sink manipulation on net photosynthetic rate and photosynthate partitioning during grain filling in winter wheat. Bio. Plant., 39: 379-385.
27. Yin, Y., Z. Wang, M. He, J. Fu and S. Lu, 1998. Postanthesis allocation of photosynthates and grain growth in wheat cultivars as affected by source/sink change. Biologia Plantarum, 41: 203-209.
28. Zhenlin, W., Y. Yin, M. He and H. Cao, 1998. Source-sink manipulation effects on post anthesis photosynthesis and grain setting on spike in winter wheat. Photosynthetica, 35: 453-459.
29. Zhu, G.X., D.J. Midmore, B.J. Radford and D.E. Yule, 2004. Effects of timing of defoliation on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in central Queesland. Field Crops Res., 88: 211-226.