Specious intrinsicalism

Philosophy of Science

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-91

  Barker, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749242621     PISSN: 00318248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/650209     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barker, Matthew J. (2007), "The Empirical Inadequacy of Species Cohesion by Gene Flow", Philosophy of Science 74: 654-665.
2. Barker, Matthew J., and Robert A. Wilson (2010), "Cohesion, Gene Flow, and the Nature of Species", Journal of Philosophy 107.
3. Blomberg, Simon P., and Theodore Garland Jr. (2002), "Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Phylogenetic Inertia, Adaptation and Comparative Methods", Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 899-910.
4. Devitt, Michael (2008), "Resurrecting Biological Essentialism", Philosophy of Science 75: 344-382.
5. Ereshefsky, Marc (2001), The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Futuyma, Douglas (1998), Evolutionary Biology. 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
7. (2005), Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
8. Gould, Stephen J., and Richard C. Lewontin (1979), "The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme", Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 205 (1161): 581-598.
9. Hansen, Thomas F. (1997), "Stabilizing Selection and the Comparative Analysis of Adaptation", Evolution 51: 1341-1351.
10. Hellberg, Michael E., Ronald S. Burton, Joseph E. Neigel, and Stephen R. Palumbi (2002), "Genetic Assessment of Connectivity among Marine Populations", Bulletin of Marine Science 70 (Supplement): 273-290.
11. Hull, David (1999), "On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line", in Robert A. Wilson (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 23-48.
12. Mayr, Ernst (1970), Populations, Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.
13. - (2000), "The Biological Species Concept", in Wheeler and Meier 2000, 17-29.
14. Mishler, Brent, and Robert Brandon (1987), "Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept", Biology and Philosophy 2: 397-414.
15. Sidelle, Alan (1989), Necessity, Essence, and Individuation: A Defense of Conventionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Sober, Elliott (1980), "Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism", Philosophy of Science 47: 350-383.
17. -(2008), Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Van Valen, Leigh ([1976] 1992), "Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks", Taxon 25: 233-239.
19. Reprinted in M. Ereshefsky (ed.), The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 70-77.
20. Wheeler, Quentin D., and Rudolf Meier, eds. (2000), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Wiley, Edward O. (1981), Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: Wiley.
22. Wilson, Robert A. (2004), Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences; Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Wilson, Robert A., Matthew J. Barker, and Ingo Brigandt (2007), "When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds", Philosophical Topics 35: 189-215.