메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 620-625

Enhancing the farm bill's conservation potential through land prioritization

Author keywords

Agriculture; Biodiversity; Conservation; Conservation Reserve Program (CRP); Farm Bill; Geographic Information System (GIS); Prioritizing; United States

Indexed keywords

GIS; HABITAT CONSERVATION; PRIORITIZATION; SATELLITE DATA; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77749240481     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/2008-315     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (5)

References (35)
  • 1
    • 0036877277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered
    • Camm, J. D., S. K. Norman, S. Polasky, and A. R. Solow. 2002. Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered. Operations Research 50:946-955.
    • (2002) Operations Research , vol.50 , pp. 946-955
    • Camm, J.D.1    Norman, S.K.2    Polasky, S.3    Solow, A.R.4
  • 2
    • 14644397930 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale
    • Caro, T., A. Engilis, Jr., E. Fitzherbert, and T. Gardner. 2004. Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale. Animal Conservation 7:63-70.
    • (2004) Animal Conservation , vol.7 , pp. 63-70
    • Caro, T.1    Engilis Jr., A.2    Fitzherbert, E.3    Gardner, T.4
  • 3
    • 34248307000 scopus 로고
    • Patterns on the American land
    • Carstensen, V. 1988. Patterns on the American land. Publius 18:31-39.
    • (1988) Publius , vol.18 , pp. 31-39
    • Carstensen, V.1
  • 5
    • 0031954865 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Threatened and endangered species geography
    • Flather, C. H., M. S. Knowles, and I. A. Kendall. 1998. Threatened and endangered species geography. BioScience 48:365-376.
    • (1998) BioScience , vol.48 , pp. 365-376
    • Flather, C.H.1    Knowles, M.S.2    Kendall, I.A.3
  • 6
    • 0030434622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biological diversity, ecosystems, and the human scale
    • Folke, C., C. S. Holling, and C. Perrings. 1996. Biological diversity, ecosystems, and the human scale. Ecological Applications 6:1018-1024.
    • (1996) Ecological Applications , vol.6 , pp. 1018-1024
    • Folke, C.1    Holling, C.S.2    Perrings, C.3
  • 7
    • 0037285206 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Temporal habitat partitioning and spatial use of coyotes and red foxes in east-central Illinois
    • Gosselink, T. E., T. R. Van Deelen, R. E. Warner, and M. G. Joselyn. 2003. Temporal habitat partitioning and spatial use of coyotes and red foxes in east-central Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management 67:90-103.
    • (2003) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.67 , pp. 90-103
    • Gosselink, T.E.1    Van Deelen, T.R.2    Warner, R.E.3    Joselyn, M.G.4
  • 8
    • 0033014012 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: What do we know for sure?
    • Harrison, S., and E. Bruna. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22:225-232.
    • (1999) Ecography , vol.22 , pp. 225-232
    • Harrison, S.1    Bruna, E.2
  • 9
    • 84864255717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fish and wildlife benefits of farm bill conservation programs: 2000-2005 update
    • Haufler J. B. editor.Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    • Haufler, J. B., editor. 2005. Fish and wildlife benefits of farm bill conservation programs: 2000-2005 update. Wildlife Society Technical Review 05-12, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
    • (2005) Wildlife Society Technical Review , pp. 05-12
  • 10
    • 0003776813 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hohman W. L.,and D. J. Halloum editors. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Technical Reports Washington, D.C., USA
    • Hohman, W. L., and D. J. Halloum, editors. 2000. A comprehensive review of farm bill contributions to wildlife conservation, 1985-2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Technical Report, Washington, D.C., USA.
    • (2000) A Comprehensive Review of Farm Bill Contributions to Wildlife Conservation, 1985-2000
  • 11
    • 84989463298 scopus 로고
    • Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: A critique
    • Landres, P. B., J. Verner, and J. W. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conservation Biology 2:316-328.
    • (1988) Conservation Biology , vol.2 , pp. 316-328
    • Landres, P.B.1    Verner, J.2    Thomas, J.W.3
  • 12
    • 0035661519 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Perils and promise of privately owned protected areas
    • Langholz, J. A., and J. P. Lassoie. 2001. Perils and promise of privately owned protected areas. BioScience 51:1079-1085.
    • (2001) BioScience , vol.51 , pp. 1079-1085
    • Langholz, J.A.1    Lassoie, J.P.2
  • 13
    • 27144527386 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are golf courses providing habitat for birds of conservation concern in Virginia?
    • LeClerc, J. E., and D. A. Cristol. 2005. Are golf courses providing habitat for birds of conservation concern in Virginia? Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:463-470.
    • (2005) Wildlife Society Bulletin , vol.33 , pp. 463-470
    • Leclerc, J.E.1    Cristol, D.A.2
  • 15
    • 0001544867 scopus 로고
    • The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation
    • Mills, L. S., M. E. Soulé, and D. F. Doak. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience 43:219-224.
    • (1993) BioScience , vol.43 , pp. 219-224
    • Mills, L.S.1    Soulé, M.E.2    Doak, D.F.3
  • 16
    • 0025595083 scopus 로고
    • Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida
    • Millsap, B. A., J. A. Gore, D. E. Runde, and S. I. Cerulean. 1990. Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildlife Monographs 111.
    • (1990) Wildlife Monographs , vol.111
    • Millsap, B.A.1    Gore, J.A.2    Runde, D.E.3    Cerulean, S.I.4
  • 17
    • 77749300661 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed 16 Mar 2008
    • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [MNDNR]. 2007. Strategy for tomorrow's habitat for the wild and rare. ,http://www.dnr.state.mn. us/cwcs/strategy.html., Accessed 16 Mar 2008.
    • (2007) Strategy for Tomorrow's Habitat for the Wild and Rare
  • 18
    • 77749300662 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed 16 Mar 2008
    • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [MNDNR]. 2008. DNR data deli. ,http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/., Accessed 16 Mar 2008.
    • (2008) DNR Data Deli
  • 19
    • 0013139162 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed 17 Feb 2008
    • Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS]. 2002. Farm bill: conservation provisions overview. ,http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/ farmbill/2002/pdf/ConsProv.pdf., Accessed 17 Feb 2008.
    • (2002) Farm Bill: Conservation Provisions Overview
  • 20
    • 77749236461 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Home page, Accessed 10 Mar 2008
    • NatureServe. 2008. Home page. ,http://www.natureserve.org/index.jsp., Accessed 10 Mar 2008.
    • (2008)
  • 21
    • 0025626173 scopus 로고
    • Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach
    • Noss, R. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4:355-364.
    • (1990) Conservation Biology , vol.4 , pp. 355-364
    • Noss, R.1
  • 22
    • 33645651286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Landscape-level conservation
    • Plieninger, T., and A. Reinbolz. 2004. Landscape-level conservation. Rangelands 26:16-23.
    • (2004) Rangelands , vol.26 , pp. 16-23
    • Plieninger, T.1    Reinbolz, A.2
  • 23
    • 0034925450 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identifying conservation-priority areas in a fragmented Minnesota landscape based on the umbrella species concept and selection of large patches of natural vegetation
    • Poiani, K. A., M. D. Merrill, and K. A. Chapman. 2001. Identifying conservation-priority areas in a fragmented Minnesota landscape based on the umbrella species concept and selection of large patches of natural vegetation. Conservation Biology 15:513-522.
    • (2001) Conservation Biology , vol.15 , pp. 513-522
    • Poiani, K.A.1    Merrill, M.D.2    Chapman, K.A.3
  • 24
    • 33748754882 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Protected areas: Goals, limitations, and design. Pages
    • M. J. Groom, G. K. Meffe, and C. R. Carroll, editors. Third edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA
    • Possingham, H. P., K. A. Wilson, S. J. Andelman, and C. H. Vynne. 2006. Protected areas: goals, limitations, and design. Pages 509-551 in M. J. Groom, G. K. Meffe, and C. R. Carroll, editors. Principles of conservation biology. Third edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
    • (2006) Principles of Conservation Biology , pp. 509-551
    • Possingham, H.P.1    Wilson, K.A.2    Andelman, S.J.3    Vynne, C.H.4
  • 27
    • 33845432087 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • W. L. Hohman and D. J. Halloum, editors. A comprehensive review of farm bill contributions to wildlife conservation, 1985-2000 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Technical Report Washington, D.C., USA
    • Ryan, M. 2000. Impact of the conservation reserve program on wildlife conservation in the Midwest. Pages 45-54 in W. L. Hohman and D. J. Halloum, editors. A comprehensive review of farm bill contributions to wildlife conservation, 1985-2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Technical Report, Washington, D.C., USA.
    • (2000) Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Wildlife Conservation in the Midwest , pp. 45-54
    • Ryan, M.1
  • 28
    • 0033388064 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation
    • Schwartz, M. W. 1999. Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:83-108.
    • (1999) Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , vol.30 , pp. 83-108
    • Schwartz, M.W.1
  • 29
    • 77749300658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Department of Agriculture. Accessed 1 Mar 2008
    • U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2007. The 2002 farm bill: glossary. ,http://www.ers.usda.gov/Features/Farmbill/2002glossary. htm#CPGL., Accessed 1 Mar 2008.
    • (2007) The 2002 Farm Bill: Glossary
  • 30
    • 77749300657 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Title II-conservation
    • U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Government Printing Office H.R. Washington, D.C., USA
    • U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2008. Title II-conservation. Food, conservation, and energy act of 2008. U.S. Government Printing Office H.R. 6124, Washington, D.C., USA.
    • (2008) Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 , vol.6124
  • 31
    • 84899968585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/AWSRFA: 027804 Washington, D.C., USA
    • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Guidelines for the state wildlife grant (SWG) program. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/AWSRFA: 027804, Washington, D.C., USA.
    • (2006) Guidelines for the State Wildlife Grant (SWG) Program
  • 32
    • 77749276543 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]. Accessed 10 Mar 2008
    • U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]. 2008. The GAP analysis program. ,http://gapanalysis.nbii.gov/portal/server.pt?open+512&objID+ 200&PageID+236&cached+true&mode+2&userID+2., Accessed 10 Mar 2008.
    • (2008) The GAP Analysis Program
  • 33
    • 33748929146 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of landscapes occupied by increasing and decreasing populations of grassland birds
    • Veech, J. A. 2006. A comparison of landscapes occupied by increasing and decreasing populations of grassland birds. Conservation Biology 20:1422-1432.
    • (2006) Conservation Biology , vol.20 , pp. 1422-1432
    • Veech, J.A.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.