Dynamics of experience service innovation: Innovation as a guided activity - results from a Danish survey

Service Industries Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 661-677

  Fuglsang, Lars ^a   Sundbo, Jon ^a   Sörensen, Flemming ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Division of labour; Dynamics of experience service innovation; Entrepreneurship; Experience economy; Innovation

Indexed keywords

ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; LABOR DIVISION; SERVICE SECTOR; SURVEY;

EID: 77649337984     PISSN: 02642069     EISSN: 17439507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02642060902822109     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2004). Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 887-907.
2. Arthur, W.B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-ins by historical events. Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131.
3. Bessant, J. (2003). High-involvement innovation: Building and sustaining competitive advantage through continuous change. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
4. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press.
5. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity - a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
6. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse. (2005). Forskning og udviklingsarbejde i den offentlige sektor. Forskningsstatistik 2005. Metode og datagrundlag. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitet.
7. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse. (2006a). Dansk erhvervslivs innovation 2004 (del af den fælleseuropæiske innovationsstatistik). Tabelsamling. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitet.
8. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse. (2006b). Innovation i dansk erhvervsliv. Innovationsstatistik 2002-2004. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitet.
9. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
10. ECON Analyse. (2006). Oplevelseserhvervene og deres geografi - Afgrænsning og måling af vækst og vækstbetingelser. Copenhagen, Denmark: ECON Analyse.
11. European Commission. (2004). Innovation in Europe. Results for the EU, Iceland and Norway. Luxembourg, UK: European Communities.
12. Fiore, A.M., Niehm, L., Jeong, Oh, H., & Hausafus, C. (2007). Experience economy strategies: Adding value to small rural businesses. Journal of Extension, 45(2), Retrieved April 2007, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2007april/iw4.php
13. Fuglsang, L. (2008). Innovation and the creative process: Towards innovation with care. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
14. Fuglsang, L., Højland, J., Sundbo, J., & Sørensen, F. (2008). Innovation i oplevelsesvirksomheder: Resultater fra en survey. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University, and Nykøbing F, Denmark: CEUS.
15. Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2009). The Law of Jante as a cultural barrier for entrepreneurship and innovation in the experience economy. Paper read at the 2009 European Academy of Management Conference on Renaissance and Renewal in Management Studies, 11-14 May 2009, Liverpool.
16. Fuglsang, L., & Sundbo, J. (2005). The organizational innovation system: Three modes. Journal of Change Management, 5(3), 329-344.
17. Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 537-556.
18. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Liebowitz, S.J., & Margolis, S.E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 11(1), 205-226.
21. Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36-76.
22. OECD. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Third edition. A joint publication of OECD and Eurostat. Paris, France: OECD.
23. Pine, B.J., & Gilmore, J.H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97-105.
24. Pine, B.J., & Gilmore, J.H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
25. Rambøll Management. (2005). Oplevelsesøkonomi i Hovedstadsregionen - perspektiver og forslag fra seks kreative brancher. Copenhagen, Denmark: Rambøll Management.
26. Simon, M., Houghton, S.M., & Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive, biases, risk perception and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113-134.
27. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
28. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(5), 171-180.
29. Yukl, G.A. (2006). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.