Comparing the time course of processing initially ambiguous and unambiguous German Svo/ovs sentences in depicted events

Eye Movements

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 517-533

  Knoeferle, Pia ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649336993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50026-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
2. Altmann G.T.M., Steedman M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 1988, 30:191-238.
3. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 2004, 111:1036-1060.
4. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The celex lexical database (cd rom). Linguistic Data Consortium 1995, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Barsalou L.W. Language comprehension: archival memory or prepared for situated action?. Discourse Processes 1999, 28:61-80.
6. Bergen B., chang N., Narayan S. Simulated action in an embodied construction grammar. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
7. Bever T. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language 1970, 279-362. Wiley, New York. J.R. Hayes (Ed.).
8. Chambers C.G., Tanenhaus M.K., Magnuson J.S. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:687-696.
9. Cooper R. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
10. Cooper R., Shallice T. Soar and the case for unified theories of cognition. Cognition 1995, 55:115-145.
11. Crocker M.W. Computational psycholinguistics: An interdisciplinary approach to the study of language 1996, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
12. Frazier L., Clifton C. Construal 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Scene perception for psycholinguists. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, Psychology Press, New York. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
14. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology 2002, Duxbury, Pacific Grove. 5th ed.
15. Jackendoff R. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
16. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., Haywood S. The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:133-156.
17. Kamide Y., Scheepers C., Altmann G.T.M. Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:37-55.
18. Knoeferle P. The role of visual scenes in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking. Published Doctoral Dissertation 2005, Saarland University. http://www.scidok.sulb.unisaarland.de/volltexte/2005/438/.
19. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:481-529.
20. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W., Scheepers C., Pickering M.J. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role assignment: Evidence from eye movements in depicted events. Cognition 2005, 95:95-127.
21. Knoeferle, P., Habets, B., Crocker, M. W., & Muente, T. F. (submitted). Visual scenes trigger immediate syntactic reanalysis: evidence from ERPs during situated spoken comprehension.
22. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101:676-703.
23. Mayberry M., Crocker M.W., Knoeferle P. A connectionist model of sentence comprehension in visual words. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2005, 1437-1442. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
24. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Roy D., Mukherjee N. Towards situated speech understanding: visual context priming of language models. Computer Speech and Language 2005, 19:227-248.
26. Sedivy J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Chambers C.G., Carlson G.N. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition 1999, 71:109-148.
27. Spivey M.J., Tanenhaus M.K., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 45:447-481.
28. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:632-634.
29. Townsend D.J., Bever T.G. Sentence comprehension: the integration of habits and rules 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K. Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. Perspectives on sentence processing 1994, 155-179. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Clifton, L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds.).
31. Zwaan R.A. The immersed experiencer: Towards an emmbodied theory of language comprehension. The psychology of learning and motivation 2004, Vol. 44. Academic Press, New York. B.H. Ross (Ed.).