On the benefits of relaxing the periodicity assumption for networked control systems over CAN

Proceedings - Real-Time Systems Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 3-12

  Anta, Adolfo ^a   Tabuada, Paulo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-TRAIN; COMMUNICATION BANDWIDTH; CONTROL LOOP; CONTROLLER AREA NETWORK; DYNAMIC ALLOCATIONS; NETWORKED CONTROL SYSTEMS;

ACTUATORS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SENSORS; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 77649321436     PISSN: 10528725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RTSS.2009.39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. [AHBLP06] A.T. Al-Hammouri, M.S. Branicky, V. Liberatore, and S.M. Phillips. Decentralized and dynamic bandwidth allocation in networked control systems. In 14th International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Real-Time Systems (WPDRTS), 2006.
2. [AT08a] A. Anta and P. Tabuada. On the benefits of relaxing the periodicity assumption for control tasks. RTAS Work-in-progress track., 2008.
3. [AT08b] A. Anta and P. Tabuada. To sample or not to sample: Self-triggered control for nonlinear systems. Accepted for publication. arXiv:0806.0709, 2008.
4. [Bam03] B. Bamieh. Intersample and finite wordlength effects in sampled-data problems. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 48(4):639-643, 2003.
5. [BC96] W. Barie and J. Chiasson. Linear and nonlinear state-space controllers for magnetic levitation. International Journal of Systems Science, 27(11):1153-1163, 1996.
6. [CHL+03] A. Cervin, D. Henriksson, B. Lincoln, J. Eker, and K.E. Arzen. How does control timing affect performance? Control Systems Magazine, IEEE, 23(3):16-30, 2003.
7. [DN00] M. Di Natale. Scheduling the CAN bus with earliest deadline techniques. In Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2000. Proceedings. The 21st IEEE, pages 259-268, 2000.
8. [FMD+00] T. Führer, B. Müller, W. Dieterle, F. Hartwich, R. Hugel, M. Walther, and R.B. GmbH. Time Triggered Communication on CAN (Time Triggered CAN-TTCAN). In Proceedings of International CAN Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.
9. [FRB05] S. Fuster, F. Rodriguez, and A. Bonastre. Software-Based EDF Message Scheduling on CAN Networks. In Embedded Software and Systems, 2005. Second International Conference on, pages 450-455, 2005.
10. [Gmb91] Robert Bosch GmbH. CAN Specification Version 2.0. 1991.
11. [Kha02] H.K. Khalil. Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
12. [MJT08] M. Mazo Jr and P. Tabuada. On Event-Triggered and Self-Triggered Control over Sensor/Actuator Networks. 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancún, Mexico, 2008.
13. [MJT09] M. Mazo Jr and P. Tabuada. On the robustness of self-triggered control for sensor/actuator networks. 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2009.
14. [NH07] M. Naughton and D. Heffernan. A new real-time message scheduling tool for control networks. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 34(3):188-194, 2007.
15. [NTC09] D. Nesic, A.R. Teel, and D. Carnevale. Explicit computation of the sampling period in emulation of controllers for nonlinear sampled-data systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(3):619-624, 2009.
16. [PA02] P. Pedreiras and L. Almeida. EDF message scheduling on controller area network. Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 13(4):163-170, 2002.
17. [RC98] F. Rodríguez and J.C. Campelo. EDF message scheduling on a CAN network. In 5th International CAN Conference, 1998.
18. [SLSS96] D. Seto, J.P. Lehoczky, L. Sha, and K.G. Shin. On task schedulability in real-time control systems. 17th IEEE RTSS, 1996.
19. [SS07] K. Schmidt and E.G. Schmidt. Systematic Message Schedule Construction for Time-Triggered CAN. Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 56(6 Part 1):3431-3441, 2007.
20. [Tab07] P. Tabuada. Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(9):1680-1685, 2007.
21. [VFL+04] M. Velasco, J.M. Fuertes, C. Lin, P. Marti, and S. Brandt. A control approach to bandwidth management in networked control systems. In Industrial Electronics Society, 2004. IECON 2004. 30th Annual Conference of IEEE, volume 3, 2004.
22. [WL09] X. Wang and M. Lemmon. Self-triggered feedback control systems with finite-gain L 2 stability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45(3):452-467, 2009.
23. [WY01] G.C. Walsh and H. Ye. Scheduling of networked control systems. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE, 21(1):57-65, 2001.
24. [ZS94] Q. Zheng and K.G. Shin. On the ability of establishing real-time channels in point-to-pointpacket-switched networks. Communications, IEEE Transactions on, 42(234):1096-1105, 1994.
25. [ZS95] K.M. Zuberi and K.G. Shin. Non-Preemptive Scheduling of Messages on controller Area Network for Real-Time Control Applications. IEEE Transactions On Robotics And Automation, 1995.
26. [ZS97] K.M. Zuberi and K.G. Shin. Scheduling Messages on Controller Area Network for Real-Time CIM Applications. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 13(2):310-314, 1997.