Patients' views of surgery and surveillance for familial adenomatous polyposis

Cancer Nursing

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Fritzell, Kaisa ^a,b   Persson, Carina ^b   Björk, Jan ^a,b   Hultcrantz, Rolf ^a,b   Wettergren, Lena ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Analysis; Colectomy; Endoscopy; Familial adenomatous; Focus group; Genetic condition; Patients view; Polyposis; Qualitative content

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; CHILD; FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; FOOD HABITS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SWEDEN;

EID: 77649315548     PISSN: 0162220X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181bb0cf1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Biesecker BB, Erby L. Adaptation to living with a genetic condition or risk: a mini-review. Clin Genet. 2008;74(5):401-407.
2. Vasen HF, Moslein G, Alonso A, et al. Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut. 2008;57(5): 704-713.
3. Bjork J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L, Alm T, Hultcrantz R. Epidemiology of familial adenomatous polyposis in Sweden: changes over time and differences in phenotype between males and females. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(12):1230- 1235.
4. Bjork JA, Akerbrant HI, Iselius LE, Hultcrantz RW. Risk factors for rectal cancer morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(12):1719-1725
5. Bjork J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L, et al. Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(7):984-992. (Pubitemid 32652722)
6. Seidel SA, Newman M, Sharp KW. Ileoanal pouch versus ileostomy: is there a difference in quality of life? Am Surg. 2000;66(6):540-546; discussion 546-547.
7. Andrews L, Mireskandari S, Jessen J, et al. Impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: attitudes toward genetic testing, support, and information needs. Genet Med. 2006;8(11):697-703.
8. Andrews L, Mireskandari S, Jessen J, et al. Impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: quality of life outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(9):1306-1315.
9. Miller HH, Bauman LJ, Friedman DR, DeCosse JJ. Psychosocial adjustment of familial polyposis patients and participation in a chemoprevention trial. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1986;16(3):211-230.
10. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Fazio VW, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 2006;93(4):407-417.
11. Osterfeld N, Kadmon M, Brechtel A, Keller M. Preoperative and postoperative quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(9):1324-1330.
12. Ko CY, Rusin LC, Schoetz DJ, et al. Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis. Paper presented at the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 100th Anniversary and Tripartite Meeting; May 01-06, 1999; Washington, DC.
13. Esplen MJ, Berk T, Butler K, Gallinger S, Cohen Z, Trinkhaus M. Quality of life in adults diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis and desmoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(5):687-695; discussion 695-686.
14. Krueger RA. Focus Group. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009.
15. Mills SJ, Chapman PD, Burn J, Gunn A. Endoscopic screening and surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis: dangerous delays. Br J Surg. 1997;84(1):74-77.
16. Patton M. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2002.
17. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112.
18. McAllister M, Davies L, Payne K, Nicholls S, Donnai D, MacLeod R. The emotional effects of genetic diseases: implications for clinical genetics. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(22):2651-2661.
19. Levitt AJ, Rodin G, Cohen Z, Berk T. Coping styles, psychopathology and intellectual performance in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1992;14(1):61-68.
20. del Rio AS, Baudet JS, Fernandez OA, Morales I, Socas MD. Evaluation of patient satisfaction in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19(10):896-900.
21. Rapier R, Houston C. A prospective study to assess the efficacy and patient tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2006;29(4):305-308.
22. Whittemore R, Dixon J. Chronic illness: the process of integration. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(7B):177-187.