Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Douglas, Flora Cg ^a   Gray, Denise A ^a   Van Teijlingen, Edwin R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SMOKING CESSATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SCOTLAND; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 77649306351     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-49     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. The Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Act 2005, Part 1. Edinburgh. Scottish Executive, 2005
2. Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts. TA Abma, Health Promotion International 2005 20 4 391 397 10.1093/heapro/dai013 15972302
3. Strong theory, flexible methods: evaluating complex community-based initiatives. K Judge L Bauld, Critical Public Health 2001 11 1 20 38
4. Realistic Evaluation. R Pawson N Tilley, Sage Publications Inc 1997
5. A framework for health promotion evaluation. I Rootman M Goodstadt L Potvin J Springett, Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and prespectives: World Health Organisation, Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, et al, 2001 7 38 11729789
6. Health Promotion Evaluation: Recommendations to Policymakers. World Health Organisation, 1998
7. Developing a Stakeholder-Driven Anticipated Timeline of Impact for Evaluation of Social Programs. S Sridharan B Campbell H Zinzow, American Journal of Evaluation 2006 27 2 148 162 10.1177/1098214006287990
8. Smoking and Pregnancy: smoking at booking by NHS board. ISD Scotland, 2008 http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/2911.html Accessed February 12th, 2009
9. Scottish Schools Adolescent Lifestyle and Substance Use Survey (SALSUS) - National Report 2006. BMRB Social Research, 2006
10. A Breath of Fresh Air for Scotland Improving Scotland's Health: The Challenge Tobacco Control Action Plan. Scottish Executive, Scottish Executive 2004
11. Reducing Smoking and Tobacco-Related Harm - A Key to Transforming Scotland's Health. NHS Health Scotland and ASH Scotland, 2003
12. Stop for Life: Final Project Report. H Connelly A Finnie A Rumbles, 2007 17451012
13. Pregnant women's perception of the implementation of smoking cessation advice. N McCurry K Thompson K Parahoo E O'Doherty A Doherty, Health Educ J 2002 61 1 20 31 10.1177/001789690206100103
14. Smoking cessation services in primary care, pharmacies, local authorities and workplaces, particularly for manual working groups, pregnant women and hard to reach communities. NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008
15. A Scotland-wide pilot programme of smoking cessation services for young people: process and outcome evaluation. W Gnich C Sheehy A Amos M Bitel S Platt, Addiction 2008 103 11 1866 1874 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02316.x 18705682
16. Getting it right: designing adolescent-centred smoking cessation services. S MacDonald H Rothwell L Moore, Addiction 2007 102 7 1147 1150 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01851.x 17567403
17. Designing and delivering smoking cessation services for young people: Lessons from the pilot programme in Scotland. NHS Health Scotland and ASH Scotland, 2007
18. Improving access to smoking cessation services for disadvantaged groups: a systematic review. RL Murray L Bauld LE Hackshaw A McNeill, Journal of Public Health 2009 31 2 258 277 10.1093/pubmed/fdp008 19208688
19. Barriers and motivators to gaining access to smoking cessation services amongst deprived smokers - a qualitative study. E Roddy M Antoniak J Britton A Molyneux S Lewis, BMC Health Services Research 2006 6 1 147 10.1186/1472-6963-6- 147 17087825
20. Targeting smokers in priority groups: the influence of government targets and policy statements. E Pound T Coleman C Adams L Bauld J Ferguson, Addiction 2005 100 s2 28 35 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01025.x 15844291
21. Finding Out what Works: Building Knowledge about Complex, Community-based Initiatives. A Coote J Allen D Woodhead, London: The King's Fund 2004
22. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. L Rychetnik M Frommer P Hawe A Shiell, J.Epidemiol.Community Health 2002 56 2 119 127 10.1136/jech.56.2.119 11812811
23. Evaluating health promotion - progress, problems and solutions. D Nutbeam, Health Promot Int 1998 13 1 27 44 10.1093/heapro/13.1.27
24. A conceptual framework for public health: NICE's emerging approach. MP Kelly E Stewart A Morgan A Killoran A Fischer A Threlfall, et al. Public Health 2009 123 1 14 e20 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.031 19100588
25. Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels. NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007
26. Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and social care policy and practice. L Bonner, Critical Public Health 2003 13 1 77 92 10.1080/0958159031000100224
27. Beyond the randomized controlled trial: a case for 'judicial review'. K Tones, Health Educ Res 1997 12 2 161 10.1093/her/12.2.161 10168570
28. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. P Craig P Dieppe S Macintyre S Michie I Nazareth M Petticrew, Br Med J 2008 337 1655 10.1136/bmj.a1655
29. Beyond evidence - to ethics: a decision-making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement. A Tannahill, Health Promot Int 2008 23 4 380 390 10.1093/heapro/dan032 18971394
30. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. RE Glasgow TM Vogt SM Boles, Am J Public Health 1999 89 9 1322 1327 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322 10474547
31. Legislation on smoking in enclosed public places in Scotland: how will we evaluate the impact? SJ Haw L Gruer A Amos C Currie C Fischbacher GT Fong, et al. Journal of Public Health 2006 28 1 24 30 10.1093/pubmed/fdi080 16488910
32. Evaluation. J Green J South, Open University Press 2006
33. Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors. K Tones, Patient Educ Couns 2000 39 2-3 227 236 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00035-X 11040722
34. Program evaluation: Forms and approaches. J Owen P Rogers, London: Sage 1999
35. An evaluation framework for health promotion: Theory, quality and effectiveness. E Wimbush J Watson, Evaluation 2000 6 3 301 321
36. Everyday evaluation on the run. Y Wadsworth, Australia: Allen & Unwin 1997
37. Voices from the field: Learning from comprehensive community initiatives. A Kubisch P Brown R Chaskin J Hirota M Joseph H Richman, et al. 1997
38. Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects and problems. JP Connell AC Kubisch, Theory, Measurement, and Analysis Washington, DC: Aspen Institute 1998
39. Logic Model Development Guide. WK Kellogg, Michigan: WK Kellogg Foundation 2004
40. Chapter 11: Mixed methods procedures. JW Cresswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Thousand Oaks: Sage 2 2003 208 227
41. The Minimum Dataset for Scottish Smoking Cessation Services. Ash Scotland, 2009 http://www.ashscotland.org.uk/ash/files/MinimumDataset-Jan2009. doc Accessed 02/10, 2010
42. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. J Ritchie J Lewis, London: Sage Publications Inc 2003
43. Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. C Pope S Ziebland N Mays, BMJ 2000 320 7227 114 116 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 10625273
44. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. AL Strauss JM Corbin, CA: Sage Publications Inc 1998
45. The range of qualitative research methods in family planning and reproductive health care. E Van Teijlingen K Forrest, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 2004 30 171 173 10.1783/1471189041261519 15222924
46. Guidance on information sheets and consent forms. Version 3.2 National Research Ethics Service. NHS National Patient Safety Agency, 2007