Fecal coliform modeling under two flow scenarios in St. Louis Bay of Mississippi

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 282-291

  Liu, Zhijun ^a,d   Hashim, Noor B ^b   Kingery, William L ^a   Huddleston, David H ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c Tennessee Technological University   (United States)

^d Dynamic Solutions LLC Knoxville   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical conditions; EFDC; Fecal coliform; HSPF; Water quality modeling

Indexed keywords

CATTLE MANURES; COASTAL AREA; CRITICAL CONDITION; DECISION MAKERS; DOMESTIC POINTS; ENVIRONMENTAL FLUIDS; FECAL COLIFORM; FECAL COLIFORM TMDL; GRAZING ANIMALS; HIGH FLOW CONDITIONS; HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATION PROGRAM - FORTRANS; LAND APPLICATIONS; LOW FLOW CONDITION; MISSISSIPPI; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; MODELING RESULTS; NON-POINT SOURCE; POULTRY LITTER; RETURN PERIODS; RURAL WATERSHEDS; TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD; URBAN RUNOFF; WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENT; WATER QUALITY MODELING; WATER QUALITY STANDARD; WATER USE; WET WEATHER;

ANIMALS; COASTAL ZONES; LANDFORMS; MANURES; RUNOFF; SEWAGE; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

WATER POLLUTION;

RUNOFF;

ARTICLE; FECAL COLIFORM; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROLOGY; MANURE; MODEL; NONHUMAN; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; PRECIPITATION; RIVER; RURAL AREA; SEASHORE; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FECES; FRESH WATER; MISSISSIPPI; WATER MICROBIOLOGY;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 77649302155     PISSN: 10934529     EISSN: 15324117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10934520903467949     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). National Water Quality Inventory: 2000 Report, Office of Water, Washington DC, 2000.
2. Smith, R.; Alexander, R.; Lanfear, K. Stream water quality in the coterminous United States - status and trends of selected indicators during the 1980's. National Water Summary 1990-1991.U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 1992.
3. Standridge, J. Coli as a public health indicator of drinking water quality. J. Amer. Water Works Asso. 2008, 100, 65-75.
4. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Protocol for developing nutrient TMDLs, EPA 841-B-99-007; Office of Water, Washington, DC, 1999.
5. Tiedemann, A.R.; Higgins, D.A.; Quigley, T.M.; Sanderson, H.R.; Bohn, C.C. Bacteria water quality responses to four grazing strategies-comparisons with Oregon Standards. J. Environ. Qual. 1988, 17, 492-498.
6. Bai, S.; Lung,W.S. Three-dimensional modeling of fecal coliformin the tidal basin ofWashingtonChannel,Washington,DC. J.Environ. Sci. Health, Pt. A, 2006, 41, 1327-1346.
7. Im, S.; Brannan, K.M.; Mostaghimi, S.; Cho, J. Simulating fecal coliformbacteria loading from an urbanizing watershed. J. Environ. Sci. Health Pt. A, 2004, 39(3), 663-679.
8. Paul, S.;Haan, P.K.; Matlock, M.D.;Mukhtar, S.; Pillai, S.D. Analysis of the HSPF water quality parameters uncertainty in predicting peak in-stream fecal coliform concentrations. Trans. ASAE. 2004, 47(1), 69-78.
9. Benham, B.L.; Brannan, K.M.;Yagow,G.; Zeckoski,R.W.; Dillaha, T.A.; Mostaghimi, S.; Wynn, J.W. Development of bacteria and benthic total maximum daily loads: a case study, Linville Creek, Virginia. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34, 1860-1872.
10. LaWare, P.; Rifai, H.S. Modeling fecal coliform contamination in the Rio Grande. J. Amer.Water Resour. Asso. 2006, 42(2), 337-356.
11. Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Total Maximum Daily Load for nutrients and organic enrichment/low DO in listed tributaries to St. Louis Bay. Office of Pollution Control. Jackson, Mississippi, 2007.
12. Liu, Z.; Hashim, N.B.; Kingery, W.L.; Huddleston, D.H.; Xia, M. Hydrodynamic modeling of St. Louis Bay estuary andwatershed using EFDC and HSPF. J. Coast. Res. Special Issue, Vol.52: Surf.WaterModel. Anal. 2008, 52, 107-116. Available online at http://cerfjcr. org/si-52/3watershed/3.3/3.3.pdf.
13. Huddleston, D.H.; Shindala, A.; Zitta, V.L.; Hashim, N.B. Mathematical modeling for development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for fecal coliform bacteria in the St. Louis Bay watershed. EPAGulf ofMexico and Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality Contract #MX984308-98 Completion Report, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, January, 2001.
14. Liu, Z.; Kieffer, J.M.; Kingery, W.L.; Huddleston, D.H.; Hossain, F. Watershed modeling of dissolved oxygen and bio-chemical oxygen demand using a hydrological simulation Fortran program. J. Environ. Sci. Health Pt. A 2007, 42(13), 2023-2032.
15. Liu, Z.; Kingery, W.L.; Huddleston, D.H.; Hossain, F.; Chen, W.; Hashim,N.B.; Kieffer, J.M. Modeling nutrient dynamics under critical flowconditions in three tributaries of St.LouisBay. J. ofEnviron. Sci. and Health, Pt. A, 2008, 43(6), 640-652.
16. Bicknell, B.R.; Imhoff, J.C.; Kittle, J.L. Jr.; Donigian, A.S. Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN,User'sMannual for Version 12.U.S.EPA, National ExposureResearch Laboratory, Athens, GA, 2001.
17. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Watershed Characterization System (WCS), Watershed & Water Quality Modeling Technical Support Center, Ecosystem Research Division. Athens, GA, 2001. Online available at: http://www.epa.gov/athens/wwqtsc/WCS-toolbox.pdf.
18. Metcalf & Eddy.Wasterwater engineering: Treatment, disposal, and reuse. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, 1991.
19. Minnis, R.B. "Personal communication,"Mississippi Gap Analysis Program, Department ofWildlife and Fisheries atMississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 2003.
20. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Bacteria Indicator Tool, 1999. Available on line at: http://www. epa.gov/waterscience/ftp/basins/system/ BASINS3/bit.htm. (Accessed July, 1999).
21. Mancini, J.L. Numerical estimates of coliformmortality rates under various conditions, J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed. 1978, 50(11): 2477-2484.
22. Mitchell, R.; Chamberlain, C. Survival of IndicatorMicroorganisms, in Indicators of Viruses inWater and Food, G. Berg, Ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, 1978.
23. Novotny, V. and Chesters, G. Handbook of Nonpoint Pollution: Sources and management.Van NostrandReinhold, NewYork, 1981.
24. Mississippi Department ofMarine Resources. Pollution Source Survey Information and FecalColiformPollution Sources thatPotentially Could Impact Mississippi Shellfish Growing Waters. Biloxi, Mississippi, 1997.
25. Pitt, R. Epidemiology and Stormwater management. In Stormwater Quality Management. CRC/Lewis publishers. New York, 1998.
26. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Results of the nationwide urban runoff program: volume I- final report, PB84- 185552, Water Planning Division, Athens, GA, 1983.
27. Zoun, R.J. Estimation of fecal coliform loadings to Galveston Bay. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2003.
28. Muchmore, C.B.;Dziegielewski, B. Impact of drought on quality of potential water supply sources in the Sangamon River basin.Water Resour. Bull. 1983, 19(1), 37-46.