Engaging students in multimedia-mediated Constructivist learning - Students' perceptions

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 254-266

  Neo, Mai ^a   Neo, Tse Kian ^a  

^a MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Constructivist learning; Malaysian perspective; Multimedia authoring; Multimedia projects; Student perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649301147     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agnew, P. W., Kellerman, A. S., & Meyer, J. (1996). Multimedia in the Classroom, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing Technological Change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Diamond, R. M. (1998). Designing & Assessing Courses & Curricula - A Practical Guide, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
4. Duffy, T.M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design & delivery of instruction. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication & technology. NY: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
5. Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. Journal of Computing and Higher Education, 16 (1), 3-29.
6. Irani, T. (1998). Communication Potential, Information Richness and Attitude: A Study in Computer Mediated Communication in the ALN Classroom. ALN Magazine, 2 (1), 1-12.
7. Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism vs. Constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39 (3), 5- 14.
8. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking Technology: Towards A Constructivist Design Model. Educational Technology, April, 34-37.
9. nd Ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 215-239.
10. Jonassen, D. H., & Henning, P. (1999). Mental Models: Knowledge in the head & knowledge in the world. Educational Technology, 39 (3), 37-42.
11. Lambert, N. M., & McCombs, B. J. (1998). Introduction: Learner-Centered Schools and Classrooms as a Direction for School Reform. In Lambert, N.M. & McCombs, B. L. (Eds.), How Students Learn: Reforming Schools Through Learner-Centered Education, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1-22.
12. Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). Exploring high school students' and teachers' preferences toward the constructivist Internet-based learning environments in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31 (2), 149-167.
13. Lim, C. P., Khine, M. S., Hew, T., Wong, P., Shanti, D., & Lim, B. (2003). Exploring critical aspects of information technologies integration in Singapore schools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (1), 1-24.
14. Low, A. L. Y., Low, K. L. T, & Koo, V. C. (2003). Multimedia learning systems: a future interactive educational tool. The Internet and Higher Education, 6 (1), 25-40.
15. Mat, J. (2000), Technology in the Malaysian Education System. Opening address at the E-Learning conference, May 25, 2000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
16. Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2006). Using hypermedia for learning complex concepts in chemistry: A qualitative study on the relationship between prior knowledge, beliefs, and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 11 (1), 33-69.
17. Norhayati, A. M., & Siew, P. H., (2004). Malaysian Perspective: Designing Interactive Multimedia Learning Environment for Moral Values Education. Educational Technology & Society, 7 (4), 143-152.
18. Oliver, K. M. (2000). Methods for Developing Constructivist Learning on the Web. Educational Technology, November-December, 5-18.
19. Oliver, R. (1998). Partnerships in teaching and learning: An emerging role for technology. Proceedings of ED- TECH'98: The Biennial Conference of the Australian Society for Educational Technology, Perth: ASET, 188-192.
20. Reeves, T. (1998). The Impact of Media and Technology in Schools: A Research Report, retrieved March 2, 2009 from http://it.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/edit6900/BertelsmannReeves98.pdf.
21. Rozhan, M. I., & Habibah, H. J. L. (2000). Online Distance Education at the Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia: Preliminary Perceptions. Educational Media International, 37 (3), 197-201.
22. Shaziti, A. (2000). Network Learning Environment as a vehicle and support tool for integrating constructivism in the everyday classroom. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education & ICT in the New Millennium, 27 October, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
23. nd Ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 161-181.
24. Suraya H. (2005). A Framework for Strategis Future E-Learning Applications to Supposrt Sustainable Growth in the E-Learning Industry. Paper presented at the International Conference on Multimedia and ICTs in Education, June 7- 10, Caceres, Spain.
25. nd Asia Pacific Conference on Problem-Based Learning, December 4-7, Singapore.
26. nd Asia Pacific Conference on Problem-Based Learning, December 4-7, Singapore.
27. Wilson, B. G. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments. Educational Technology, 35 (5), 25-30.
28. Winnips, K., & McLoughlin, C. (2001). Six WWW Based Learner Supports you can Build. In Montgomerie, C. & Viteli, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of Ed-Media 2001, Morgantown, WV: AACE, 2062-2067.
29. Wong, S. L., Kamariah, A. B., & Tang, S. H. (2003). Differences in Anxiety Between IT Competent And Incompetent Malaysian Pre-Service Teachers: Can a Discrete IT Course Taught in a Constructivist Learning Environment Solve This Problem? Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2 (4), retrieved March 2, 2009 from http://www.tojet.net/articles/244.htm