Exploring structural prestige in learning object repositories: Some insights from examining references in MERLOT

International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, INCoS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 212-218

  Sicilia, Miguel Angel ^a   Sánchez Alonso, Salvador ^a   García Barriocanal, Elena ^a   Rodríguez García, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Learning object; Repositories; Social network analysis, prestige, MERLOT

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; DATA SETS; LEARNING OBJECT REPOSITORIES; LEARNING OBJECTS; RELATIONAL MODEL; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

EID: 77649299241     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INCOS.2009.12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. K. Brosnan, "Developing and sustaining a national learning-object sharing network: A social capital theory perspective," In: J.B. Williams, & M.A. Goldberg (Eds.), Proceedings of The ASCILITE 2005 Conference, pp. 105-114, Brisbane: Australia.
2. S. Monge, R. Ovelar and I. Azpeitia, "Repository 2.0: Social Dynamics to Support Community Building in Learning Object Repositories". Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4, 2008, http://ijklo.org/Volume4/IJELLOv4p191-204Monge.pdf
3. P. Han, G. Kortemeyer, B.J. Kramer and C. von Prummer, "Exposure and Support of Latent Social Networks Among Learning Object Repository Users". Journal of Universal Computer Science (J.UCS), 14, 2008.
4. X. Ochoa and E. Duval, "Quantitative Analysis of Learning Object Repositories". Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2008, pp. 6031-6048, Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
5. S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, 1994.
6. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani and T. Winograd, "The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web". Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, paper SIDL-WP-1999-0120 (version of 11/11/1999).
7. C.M. Kelty, C.S. Burrus and R.G. Baraniuk, R.G. "Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a Case Study in Postpublication Quality Assurance". Proceedings of the IEEE vol 96, issue 6, 2008, pp.1000-1011.
8. R. Cafolla, "Project Merlot: Bringing Peer Review to Web-based Educational Resources". Proceedings of the USA Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 2002, pp. 614-618.
9. E. García-Barriocanal and M.A. Sicilia, "Filtering Information with Imprecise Social Criteria: A FOAF-based backlink model". Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, EUSFLAT 2005, pp. 1094-1098.
10. J. Vargo, J.C. Nesbit, K. Belfer and A. Archambault, "Learning object evaluation: Computer mediated collaboration and inter-rater reliability". International Journal of Computers and Applications, vol. 25 issue 3, 2003, pp. 198-205.
11. Y. Biletskiy, M. Wojcenovic, and H. Baghi. "Focused Crawling for Downloading Learning Objects. - An Architectural Perspective". Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects vol 5, 2009, pp. 169-180, http://ijklo.org/Volume5/IJELLOv5p169-180Biletskiy416.pdf
12. L.A. Adamic and B.A. Huberman, "Zipf's law and the internet." Glottometrics vol. 3, 2002, pp. 143-150.
13. J.E. Hirsch, "An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output". PNAS 102 (46), 2005, pp. 16569-16572.