Commercializing a disruptive technology based upon university ip through open innovation

International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 225-239

  Minshall, Tim ^a   Seldon, Stuart ^a   Probert, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disruptive technologies; Open innovation; Technology ecosystem; University spin outs

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649298916     PISSN: 02198770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219877007001107     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alvarez, S. A. and J. B. Barney (2001). How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Academy of Management Executive 15(1): 139-148.
2. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
3. Barney, J. B., M. Wright and D. J. Ketchen (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management 27: 625-641.
4. CDT (2007). www.cdtltd.co.uk.
5. CE (2007). Cambridge Enteprise Ltd, www.enterprise.cam.ac.uk.
6. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA.
7. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Business Models. Cambridge MA, Harvard Business School Press.
8. Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (Eds.) (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press.
9. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator?s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Cambridge MA, Harvard Business School Press, ISBN: 0875845851.
10. De Meyer, A. (1999). Using strategic partnerships to create a sustainable competitive position for high tech start-up firms. R&D Management 29(4): 323-328.
11. Druilhe, C. and E. W. Garnsey (2004). Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 29: 269-285.
12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
13. Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government, Pinter:London.
14. Fraser, P., T. H.W. Minshall and D. Probert (2005). The Distributed Innovation Paradigm: Evolution and Dynamics. 6th International CINet Conference Continuous Innovation - (Ways of ) Making Things Happen, Brighton, 4-.7 September 2005.
15. Fraser, P., T. H. W. Minshall and D. Probert (2005). Them and Us - Asymmetric Dyads Involving Early-Stage Technology Firms. 27th R&D Management Association (RADMA) Conference 2005, 6-.8 July, Pisa, Italy.
16. Garnsey, E. W. (1998). A theory of the early growth of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 7(3): 523-556.
17. Gill, D., T. H. W. Minshall, C. Pickering and M. Rigby (2007). Funding Technology: Britain Forty Years On. Cambridge, St John?s Innovation Centre and Institute for Manufacturing, ISBN 1-902546-50-4.
18. HEFCE (2005). Higher education-business and community interaction survey 2002-03. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05 07/.
19. HEFCE (2006). Higher education-business and community interaction survey 2003-04. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06 25/.
20. IfM (2007). http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/pp/inkjet/community.html.
21. Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report. London, HM Treasury, www.lambertreview.org.uk.
22. Leydesdorff, L. and H. Etzkowitz (1998). Triple Helix of Innovation: Introduction. Science and Public Policy 25(6): 358-364.
23. LibraryHouse (2005). Flight to quality: The Cambridge cluster report 2004, LibraryHouse, Cambridge, UK.
24. Livesey, F., T. H. W. Minshall and J. Moultrie (2006). Investigating the technology-based innovation gap for the United Kingdom: A report for the UK Design Council. Cambridge, UK, University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, ISBN 1-902546-49-0.
25. Mankins, J. C. (1995). Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper, NASA: From: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trl/trl.pdf.
26. Minshall, T. H. W. (2005). Alliance business models for university start-up technology ventures: A resource-based perspective. New technology-based firms in the new millennium Volume IV. W. During, R. Oakey and S. Kauser. Oxford, UK, Elsevier, ISBN 10-0-08-044619-1: 203-218.
27. Minshall, T. H. W., W. Wicksteed, C. Druilhe, A. Kells, M. Lynskey and J. Siraliova (2005). The role of spin-outs within university research commercialisation activities: Case studies from 10 UK universities. 13th High Tech Small Firms Conference, 26-.27 May 2005, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, UK.
28. Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, Wiley.
29. Rothwell, R. (1983). Innovation and firm size: A case of dynamic complementarity. Journal of General Management 8(6): 5-25.
30. Slater, S. F. and J. J. Mohr (2006). Successful development and commercialisation of technological innovation: Insights based upon strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23: 26-33.
31. Stone, H. J., K. J. Iwamasa, S. S. Lundine and J. W. Jasper (2005). Picking winners: A framework for evaluating success potential of technology commercialisation. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 4(3): 255-278.
32. Utterback, J. M. and H. J. Acee (2005). Disruptive technologies: An expanded view. International Journal of Innovation Management 9(1): 1-17.
33. Walsh, S. T. and S. K. Kassicieh (2004). Models for the commercialisation of disruptive technologies. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 3(2).
34. Webster, A. and H. Etzkowitz (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future. Research Policy 29(2): 313.