The influence of NICE guidance on the uptake of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Journal of Public Health

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 541-545

  Green, Chris J ^a   Maxwell, Roy ^b,c   Verne, Julia ^c   Martin, Richard M ^b   Blazeby, Jane M ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c Grosvenor House ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; NICE guidelines

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DATABASES AS TOPIC; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 77649268891     PISSN: 17413842     EISSN: 17413850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp027     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anonymous. Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Technological appraisal Guidance No. 17. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. December 2000.
2. Guillou PJ, Quike P, Thorpe H et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised control trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718-1726
3. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al. COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group - COLOR. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(7):477-484
4. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 2004;350(20):2050-2059
5. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 2006;93(3):300-308
6. Anonymous. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Review of NICE Technological appraisal Guidance No. 17. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. August 2006.
7. Hospital Episode Statistics. http://www.hesonline.org.uk/Ease/ servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=87 (16 October 2008, date last accessed).
8. NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre, HES. Data quality. http://www.hesonline.org.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1 937&categoryID=97 (16 October 2008, date last accessed).
9. World Health Organisation. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1992.
10. Department of Health. The Stationery Office. OPCS Classification of Interventions and Procedures, Version 4.3 and 4.4. NHS Connecting for Health: Dept. of Health. The Stationery Office, 2006.
11. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ et al. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000;19:335-351
12. Sheldon TA, Cullum N, Dawson D et al. What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews. Br Med J 2004;329:999.
13. The Department of Health: Cancer Reform Strategy. http://www.dh. gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicy AndGuidance/DH-081006 (8 November 2008 date last accessed)
14. Slim K, Chipponi J. Laparoscopic surgery today. Br J Surg 2006; 93:779-780
15. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Position statement: Laparoscopic Colectomy for Curable Cancer. http:// www.fascrs.org/physicians/position-statements/laparoscopic- colectomy/ (19 January 2009 date last accessed).
16. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. New York: Free Press, 2003.
17. The Audit Commission. PbR Data Assurance Framework 2007/08. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/Products/NATIONALREPORT/ CD8608E5-A7D9-4a5a- B0F3-C161B76DE630/ PbRreport.pdf (25 January 2009 date last accessed).
18. Westaby S, Archer N, Manning N et al. Comparison of hospital episode statistics and central cardiac audit database in public reporting of congenital heart surgery mortality. Br Med J 2007;335:759.