Experiences of professionals participating in inter-organisational cooperation aimed at promoting clients' return to work

Work

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 143-151

  Söderberg, Elsy ^a   Vimarlund, Vivian ^a   Alexanderson, Kristina ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cooperative competence; Cooperative projects; Return to work; Sickness absence; Unemployed; Work capacity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL CARE; SWEDEN; WORK CAPACITY;

CASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; PUBLIC ASSISTANCE; SICK LEAVE; SWEDEN; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION;

EID: 77649266872     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0966     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. C. Ahlgren and A. Hammarström, Has increased focus on vocational rehabilitation led to an increase in young employees' return to work after work-related disorders? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 27(3) (1999), 220-228.
2. K. Alexanderson and A. Norlund, (Eds), Sickness absence-causes, consequences, and physicians?sickness certification practice. A systematic review by the Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 32(Supplement 63), 2004.
3. B. Arrelov, Towards Understanding of Determinants of Physicians' Sick-listing Practice and their Interrelations: A population-based Epidemological Study, in Institutionen fö r folkhälso-och vårdvetenskap, Uppsala Universitet: Uppsala, 2003.
4. A. Berger, Developing multi-functional teams in public service-from prescribed helplessness to percieved self-esteem, International Journal of Technology Management 22(1-3) (2001), 108-125.
5. H. Berglind and U. Gerner, Motivation and return to work among the long-term sick-listed: an action theory perspective, Disability Rehabilitation 20,24(14) (2002), 719-726.
6. S. Brage, Musculosketal Health Problems and Sickness Absence-an Epidemiological Study of Concepts, Determinants, and Consequences, University of Oslo, 1998.
7. E. Brodkin, Inside the welfare contract: discretion and accountability in state welfare administration, Social Service Review 71(1) (1997), 1-33.
8. N.J. Buys andJ. Rennie, Developing relationships between vocational rehabilitation agencies and employers, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 44(2) (2001), 95-103.
9. I. Cassis, K. Dupriez and B. Burnand, Quality of work incapacity assessment in the Swiss disability insurance system, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 8(6) (1996), 567-575.
10. L. Eskelinen, A. Kohvakka and T. Merisalo, Relationship between the self-assessment and clinical assessment of health status and work ability. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 17(Suppl 1) (1991), 40-47.
11. F. Ford, J. Ford and C. Dowrick, Welfare to work: the role of general practice, Brit J Gen Pract 50(455) (2000), 497-500.
12. M. Friesen, A. Yassi and J. Cooper, Return to work: The importance of human interactions and organization structures, Work 17(1) (2001), 11-22.
13. H. Gadamer, Trust and Method, New York: The Crossroad Publishing Co, 1989.
14. W.J. Gingerich and S. Eisengart, Solution-focused brief therapy: A review of the outcome research, Family Process 39 (2000), 477-498.
15. A. Hammarström, Health consequences of youth unemployment-review from a gender perspective, Social Science and Medicine 38(5) (1994), 699-709.
16. Y. Hasenfeld, (ed.), Human Services as Complex Organizations, SAGE: Newbury Park, 1992.
17. G. Hensing, K. Alexanderson and T. Timpka, Dilemmas in the daily work of social insurance officers, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 6 (1997), 301-309.
18. B. Hvinden, Divides Against Itself, A study of Integration in Welfare Bureaucracy. Vol.1994c, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1994.
19. E. Jacobsen et al., Perspectives on lifestyle intervention: The views of general practitioners who have taken part in a health promotion study, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 33 (2005), 4-10.
20. B. Jakobsson et al., Improved cooperation in vocational rehabilitation with systematic rehabilitation group meetings, Disability and rehabilitation 24(14) (2002), 734-740.
21. E.Johansson et al., I've been crying my way-qualitative analyses of a group of female patients, consultation experiences, Family Practice 13 (1996), 498-503.
22. R. Johansson, Vid byråkratins gränser, Om handlingsfrihetens organisatoriska begränsningar (On the border of bureaucracy) (In Swedish), Arkiv förlag och Författaren: Lund, 1992.
23. G. Karlsson, Psychological Qualitative Research from a Phe-nomenological Perspective, Göteborg, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1995.
24. L. Katz, The experience of personal change, in Union Graduate School, Union Institute, Cincinatty: Cincinatty, Ohio, 1987.
25. D. Kenny, Determinants of patient satisfaction with medical consultation, Psychology and Health 10 (1995), 427-437.
26. S. Kvale, The qualitative research interview: A phenomeno-logical and a hermeneutical mode of understanding, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14 (1983), 171-196.
27. B. Lierop and F. Nijhuis, Assessment, education and placement: an integrated approach to vocational rehabilitation, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 23 (2000), 261-269.
28. R. Lindqvist and O. Grape, Vocational rehabilitation of the socially disadvantaged long-term sick: interorganisational cooperation between welfare state agencies, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 27(1) (1999), 5-11.
29. R. Lindqvist and S. Marklund, Forced to work and liberated from work-a historical perspective on work and welfare in Sweden, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 4(4) (1995), 224-237.
30. R. Lindqvist, Att sätta gränser. Organisationer och reformer i arbetsrehabilitering (Creating borders. Organisations and reforms in vocational rehabilitation)(In Swedish), Umeå: Boré a Bokförlag, 2000.
31. M. Lipsky, Bureaucratic Disentitlement in Social Welfare Programs, Social Services Review 58 (1984), 3-27.
32. M. Lipsky, Street-level-bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 1980, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
33. S. Marklund, Worklife and health in Sweden 2000, Solna: Swedish Work Environment Authority and National Institute of Working life, 2001.
34. S.-U. Marnetoft et al., Unemployed long-term sicklisted people in rural Jämtland compared with circumstances in the city of Stockholm, Sweden, Work, A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 10 (1998), 3-8.
35. S.-U. Marnetoft, Vocational rehabilitation of unemployed sick-listed people in a Swedish rural area. An individual-level study based on social insurance data, in Division of Reha-bilitation Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska institute, Karolinska Institutet: Stockholm, 2000.
36. S. Maynard-Moody and M. Musheno, State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2) (2000), 329-358.
37. S. Meddings and R. Perkins, Service user perspectives on the rehabilitation team and roles of professionals within it, Journal of Mental health 8(1) (1999), 87-94.
38. S.A. Mohrman and T.G. Cummings, Self-Designing Organizations: Learning How to Create High Performance, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
39. U. Müssener, Encouraging Encounters. Experiences of People on Sick Leave in Their Meetings with professionals, in Division of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University: Linköping, 2006.
40. E.Overbye, Dilemmas in Disability Activation and How Scandinavians Try to Live with Them, in: Welfare to Work in Practice. Social Security and Participation in Economic and Social Life, P. Saunders, ed., Ashgate Publishing Limited: Hants and Burlington, 2005.
41. M.Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, London: Sage Publications, Inc., 1990.
42. R. Prins and A. De Graaf, Comparision of sickness absence in Belgian, German, and Dutch firms, British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43 (1986), 529-536.
43. J. Prottas, People-processing, The Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Bureaucracies, Lexington, Massachussetts: Lexington Books, 1979.
44. H. Reiso et al., Work ability assessed by patients and their GPs in new episodes of sickness certification, Family Practice 17(2) (2000), 139-144.
45. E. Söderberg and K. Alexanderson, Gate-keepers in sickness insurance-a systematic review of the literature on practices of social insurance officers, Health and Social Care in the Community 13(3) (2005), 211-223.
46. E. Söderberg, Society-based strategies and management routines aimed at promoting return to work, in: Strategies for health-an anthology, P. Nilsen, ed., Department of Health and Society, Linkoping University, Linköping: Linköping, 2007.
47. S. Sanders et al., Chronic low back pian patients around the world: cross-cultural simularities and differences, Clinical Journal of Pain 8(4) (1992), 317-323.
48. H. Schmid Relationships between Decentralized Authority and Other Structural Properties in Human Service Organisations: Implications for Service Effectiveness, Administration in Social Work 1993 SOU, Handlingsplan för ökad hälsa i arbetslivet (An agenda for better health in worklife)(In Swedish), Socialdeparte-mentet: Stockholm, 2002.
49. S. Steihaug and K. Malterud, Recognition and Reciprocity in Encounters with Women with Chronic Muscular Pain, Scandinavian Journal Prim Health Care, 20 2002.
50. S. Steihaug, B. Ahlsen and K. Malterud, I am allowed to be myself: women with chronic muscular pain being recognized, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 30 (2002), 281-287.
51. M. Van Manen, Researching Lived Experiences, The Althouse Press: University of Western Ontario, 1997.