Short-term effect of cattle exclosures on Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris) populations and habitat in Northeastern Oregon

Journal of Herpetology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 132-138

  Adams, Michael J ^a   Pearl, Christopher A ^a   McCreary, Brome ^a   Galvan, Stephanie K ^a   Wessell, Stephanie J ^a   Wente, Wendy H ^a   Anderson, Chauncey W ^b   Kuehl, Allison B ^c  

^a FOREST AND RANGELAND ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b Oregon Water Science Center   (United States)

^c Wallowa Whitman National Forest   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; BOS; RANA LUTEIVENTRIS;

EID: 77649266850     PISSN: 00221511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1670/08-016R2.1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BAKER, J. M. R., AND T. R. HALLIDAY. 1999. Amphibian colonization of new ponds in an agricultural landscape. Herpetological Journal 9:55-63.
2. BELSKY, A. J., A. MATZKE, AND S. USELMAN. 1999. Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54:419-431.
3. BOYER, R., AND C. E. GRUE. 1995. Research: the need for water quality criteria for frogs. Environmental Health Perspectives 103:352-357.
4. BULL, E. L., AND M. P. HAYES. 2000. Livestock effects on reproduction of the Columbia Spotted Frog. Journal of Range Management 53:291-294.
5. BULL, E. L., AND D. B. MARX. 2002. Influence of fish and habitat on amphibian communities in high elevation lakes in northeastern Oregon. Northwest Science 76:240-248.
6. CORN, P. S. 2000. Amphibian declines: review of some current hypotheses. In D. W. Sparling, G. Linder, and C. A. Bishop (eds.), Ecotoxicology of Amphibians and Reptiles, pp. 663-696. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL.
7. CRUMPACKER, D. W. 1984. Regional riparian research and a multi-university approach to the special problem of livestock grazing in the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains. In R. E. Warner and K. Hendrix (eds.), California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management, pp. 413-422. University of California Press, Berkeley.
8. FISHMAN, M. J. (ed.). 1993. Methods of Analysis by the U. S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: Determination of Inorganic and Organic Constituents in Water and Fluvial Sediments. U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93-125, Denver, CO.
9. FISHMAN, M. J., AND L. C. FRIEDMAN (eds.). 1989. Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments. 3rd ed. U. S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigation Report 05-A1, Denver, CO. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/twri/ twri5-a1/pdf/TWRI-5-A1.pdf.
10. FRANKLIN, J. F., AND C. T. DYRNESS. 1988. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
11. GOSNER, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.
12. JANSEN, A., AND M. HEALEY. 2003. Frog communities and wetland condition: relationships with grazing by domestic livestock along an Australian floodplain river. Biological Conservation 109:207-219.
13. KNUTSON, M. G., W. B. RICHARDSON, D. M. REINEKE, B. R. GRAY, J. R. PARMELEE, AND S. E. WEICK. 2004. Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecological Applications 14:669-684.
14. MONELLO, R. J., AND R. G. WRIGHT. 1999. Amphibian habitat preferences among artificial ponds in the Palouse region of northern Idaho. Journal of Herpetology 33:298-303.
15. MORRIS, R. L., AND W. W. TANNER. 1969. The ecology of the Western Spotted Frog, Rana pretiosa pretiosa Baird and Girard: a life history study. Great Basin Naturalist 29:45-81.
16. PEARL, C. A., J. BOWERMAN, AND D. KNIGHT. 2005. Feeding behavior and aquatic habitat use by Oregon Spotted Frogs (Rana pretiosa) in central Oregon. Northwestern Naturalist 86:36-38.
17. PEARL, C. A., M. J. ADAMS, AND W. H. WENTE. 2007. Characteristics of Columbia Spotted Frog (Rana luteiventris) oviposition sites in northeastern Oregon, USA. Western North American Naturalist 67:86-91.
18. PILLIOD, D. P., C. R. PETERSON, AND P. I. RITSON. 2002. Seasonal migration of Columbia Spotted Frogs (Rana luteiventris) among complementary resources in a high mountain basin. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:1849-1862.
19. REASER, J. K. 2000. Demographic analysis of the Columbia Spotted Frog (Rana luteiventris): case study in spatiotemporal variation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:1158-1167.
20. REASER, J. K., AND D. S. PILLIOD. 2005. Rana luteiventris Thompson 1913, Columbia Spotted Frog. In M. Lannoo (ed.), Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species, pp. 559-563. University of California Press, Berkeley.
21. ROSS, D. A., J. K. REASER, P. KLEEMAN, AND D. L. DRAKE. 1999. Rana luteiventris (Columbia Spotted Frog): mortality and site fidelity. Herpetological Review 30:163.
22. USFWS (UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE). 1997. Endangered and Threatened Species; Review of Plant and Animal Taxa; Proposed Rule. (Federal Register: September 19, 1997 [Vol. 62, No. 182]) 50 CFR Part 17. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
23. WATSON, J. W., K. R. MCALLISTER, AND D. J. PIERCE. 2003. Home ranges, movements, and habitat selection of Oregon Spotted Frogs (Rana pretiosa). Journal of Herpetology 37:292-300.
24. WENTE, W. H., M. J. ADAMS, AND C. A. PEARL. 2005. Evidence of decline for Bufo boreas and Rana luteiventris in and around the northern Great Basin, western USA. Alytes 22:95-108.
25. WHITE, G., D. ANDERSON, K. BURNHAM, AND D. OTIS. 1982. Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Technical Report LA-8787-NERP. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
26. WILDE, F. D., AND D. B. RADTKE. 2005. Field Measurements: General Information and Guidelines. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 9. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.