A comprehensive analysis of marketing journal rankings

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 75-92

  Steward, Michelle D ^a   Lewis, Bruce R ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AACSB accredited schools; Discipline; Institutional perspective; Journal perceptions; Journal rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649266053     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475309344804     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bauerly, R.J., & Johnson, D.T. (2005). An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 313-329.
2. Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of Marketing, 67, 123-139.
3. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
4. Doyle, J.R., & Arthurs, A.J. (1995). Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study. Omega, 23, 235-344.
5. Easton, G., & Easton, D.M. (2003). Marketing journals and the research assessment exercise. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(1/2), 5-24.
6. Geary, J., Marriott, L., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). Journal rankings in business and management and the 2001 research assessment exercise in the UK. British Journal of Management, 15, 95-141.
7. Guidry, J.A., Guidry Hollier, B.N., Johnson, L., Tanner, J.R., & Veltsos, C. (2004). Surveying the cites: A ranking of marketing journals using citation analysis. Marketing Education Review, 14, 45-59.
8. Hawes, J.M., & Keillor, B. (2002). Assessing marketing journals: A mission-based approach. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 3, 70-86.
9. Heischmidt, K.A., & Gordon, P. (1993). Rating marketing publications: Impact of accreditation and publication history. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 152-158.
10. Hult, G.T.M., Neese, W.T., & Bashaw, R.E. (1997). Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19, 37-52.
11. Hunt, S.D. (1993). Objectivity in marketing theory and research. Journal of Marketing, 57, 76-91.
12. Hustad, T. (1997). From the editor. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 157-237.
13. Koojaroenprasit, N., Weinstein, A., Johnson, W.C., & Remington, D.O. (1998). Marketing journal rankings revisited: Research findings and academic implications. Marketing Education Review, 8, 95-102.
14. Lewis, B.R. (2008, November/December). Judging the journals. BizEd, pp. 42-45.
15. Lewis, B.R., Templeton, G.F., & Luo, X. (2007). A scientometric investigation into the validity of IS journal quality measures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 619-633.
16. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 278-287.
17. Lowry, P.B., Romans, D., & Curtis, A. (2004). Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of Information Systems journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2), 29-76.
18. McAlister, L. (2005). Unleashing potential. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 16-17.
19. Mingers, J. (2005). Quality of journals difficult to measure. OR/MS Today, 32(3), 20.
20. Mort, G.S., McColl-Kennedy, J.R., Kiel, G., & Soutar, G.N. (2004). Perceptions of marketing journals by senior academics in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian Marketing Journal, 12(2), 51-61.
21. Nisonger, T.E. (2004). The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries. The Serials Librarian, 47(1/2), 57-75.
22. Peffers, K., & Tang, Y. (2003). Identifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: Ranking the journals. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5, 63-84.
23. Peter, J.P. (1979). Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 6-17.
24. Polonsky, M.J., Jones, G., & Kearsley, M.J. (1999). Accessibility: An alternative method of ranking marketing journals? Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 181-193.
25. Polonsky, M.J., & Waller, D.S. (1993). Marketing journals and Asia Pacific marketing academics: An exploratory study. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 1, 61-69.
26. Polonsky, M.J., & Whitelaw, P. (2006). A multi-dimensional examination of marketing journal rankings by North American academics. Marketing Education Review, 16(3), 59-72.
27. Swanson, E.P. (2004). Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21, 223-255.
28. Theoharakis, V., & Hirst, A. (2002). Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective. Marketing Letters, 13, 389-402.
29. Van Fleet, D.D., McWilliams, A., & Siegal, D.S. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26, 839-861.
30. Walstrom, K.A. (2001). A review of relative prestige of business research journals. The Serials Librarian, 41, 85-99.
31. Zinkhan, G.M., & Leigh, T. (1999). Assessing the quality ranking of the Journal of Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 51-70.